By Scott Wilson
For much of his time in office, President Obama has been accused by a mix of conservative hawks and liberal interventionists of overseeing a dangerous retreat from the world at a time when American influence is needed most.
The once-hopeful Arab Spring has staggered into civil war and military coup. China is stepping up territorial claims in the waters off East Asia. Longtime allies in Europe and in the Persian Gulf are worried by the inconsistency of a president who came to office promising the end of the United States’ post-Sept. 11 wars.
Now Ukraine has emerged as a test of Obama’s argument that, far from weakening American power, he has enhanced it through smarter diplomacy, stronger alliances and a realism untainted by the ideology that guided his predecessor.
Trending: Conflict of Pinterest
It will be a hard argument for him to make, analysts say.
A president who has made clear to the American public that the “tide of war is receding” has also made clear to foreign leaders, including opportunists in Russia, that he has no appetite for a new one. What is left is a vacuum once filled, at least in part, by the possibility of American force.
‘If you are effectively taking the stick option off the table, then what are you left with?’ said Andrew C. Kuchins, who heads the Russia and Eurasia Program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies. ‘I don’t think that Obama and his people really understand how others in the world are viewing his policies.’
Read more: Washington Post.
The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Barb Wire.