Shouldn’t DOJ be More Focused on Indicting Hillary Clinton than Julian Assange?

Shortly after Jeff Sessions became Attorney General, he announced that he would never bring any charges against Hillary Clinton.

That was around the same time he recused himself from anything dealing with Russia.

Over the past two years, there have been mountains of evidence that warrant deep investigations and probable indictments against Hillary Clinton, members of her campaign, the Democratic National committee, the Clinton Foundation and others.

One would think that the DOJ should be busy investigating the many allegations that have been made against Clinton and others, but it seems they are not.

Trending: Isolated Russia and the World’s Policeman

Instead, they are busy trying to indict Julian Assange, an Australian.

DC Clothesline –  Seriously: Why is the DOJ indicting Julian Assange but not Hillary Clinton? – According to the Wall Street Journal, the U.S. Justice Department is about to indict and prosecute Julian Assange, a journalist whose life has already been destroyed through his “imprisonment” in an Ecuadorian embassy for the last six years.

Meanwhile, Hillary Clinton, a traitorous political mafia boss who sold out America’s strategic uranium supply to enemies while collecting “speaking fee” bribes from international oligarchs, is apparently not being prosecuted by anyone at all.

What’s wrong with this picture?

If anyone should go free today, it’s Julian Assange. And if anyone should be indicted and prosecuted for serious crimes, it’s Hillary Clinton. Yet, as the WSJ reports:

U.S. prosecutors have discussed several types of charges they could potentially bring against Mr. Assange… The exact charges Justice Department might pursue remain unclear, but they may involve the Espionage Act, which criminalizes the disclosure of national defense-related information…

Consider the fact that Assange has tried to make things public knowledge while Hillary Clinton has a track record of lying and covering up the truth whenever it suits her

Assange has focused his career of informing the public while Clinton has focused her career on herself by whatever means possible, honest or dishonest

Assange is a foreigner who hasn’t been in the US for years, but Clinton is a homegrown radical socialist who has been trying to systematically destroy America.

Perhaps under the leadership of Acting Attorney General Matthew Whitaker, America will finally see some justice taken to hold Clinton and other Democrats accountable for their actions.

READ MORE HERE

 

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Barb Wire.

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.