The Obama Administration’s About-Face on Medicare

Barb Wire

It looks like the Obama Administration is backing off of their policy on Medicare much like it has on Obamacare. Note also from this report by the Heritage Foundation’s Amy Payne that the much maligned Bush Administration “Medicare Part D” is costing less than anticipated. The Heritage Foundation reports:

The Obama administration seems determined not to rock the boat before the midterm congressional election this fall.

It’s already delayed Obamacare mandates that could cause outrage. Now it has stopped proposed Medicare changes that weren’t even part of Obamacare—and with good reason.

The administration had proposed new rules for seniors’ prescription drug plans in Medicare Part D. This is significant because Part D is unusual for a government program:

  • People love it. Nearly 90 percent of beneficiaries are satisfied with their plans.
  • It’s cost-effective. The program’s cost is running 48 percent LOWER than originally estimated, and seniors’ premiums have been impressively stable.
  • It showcases the success of competition. Medicare is unwieldy and needs reform—and adding the prescription drug benefit expanded the program’s reach. But the reason it has worked better than expected is that privately run plans are competing for seniors’ business.

The administration’s proposed changes would upset the very factor that produces these results—choice.

Heritage experts Alyene Senger and Robert Moffit explain that the changes “would have inflicted serious damage on seniors’ Medicare Part D benefits.” One of the proposed changes would have restricted the number of prescription drug plans an insurer could offer, which would decrease the choices available to seniors.

The administration argued that less choice would help seniors, because having too many options could be “confusing.”

The result of this change: More insurance plans would be cancelled. One study estimated that about 7.4 million Medicare beneficiaries would be affected by either cancellations or changes to their plans.

Read more: Heritage.org

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Barb Wire.

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.