For the past 2 years, we have heard tons of news accusing Russia of trying to meddle in the 2016 elections and there has been credible evidence to support that allegation.
While at the United Nations early this week, President Donald Trump claimed that China has been trying to meddle in the 2018 midterm elections with the purpose of hindering Trump’s presidency by helping Democrats get elected.
Over the past decade, we’ve also seen numerous claims of voter fraud, mostly by Democrats and some involving large numbers of illegal aliens and other non-citizens.
But did you know that perhaps some of the most insidious election meddling has been taking place right here in America.
One report claims that an Obama appointed judge issued a ruling that could easily be called election meddling.
(The Revolutionary Act) – Rightly, Americans are worried about the use of dark money in our election process, money that flows from organization to organization (political action committees, or PACs) without identification as to the source, and used for the purposes of supporting candidates or campaigns.
Americans are also worried about the possibility of foreign governments, most notably the Russians, meddling with our election process.
But in August, without the knowledge of the overwhelming number of Americans, an Obama-appointed federal judge skewed the flow of funds to some election campaigns while sparing others without forewarning, and with significant effects on the outcome of primary elections like the ones in Florida that were so near the time of the ruling.
So while some Americans worry about Russian meddling, a clearer case of election tampering from inside the United States just occurred.
The case, Crossroads Grassroots Policy Strategies v. Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, et al, arose out of a 2012 incident in Tampa, Fla., involving Karl Rove. Apparently, at a fundraiser sponsored by Crossroads GPS, Rove made an offer. He told those in attendance that an “anonymous donor” had offered to match up to $3 million in contributions to whatever contributions they made that night. The offer resulted in an extra $1.3 million being raised…
Obama appointed judges have been pushing his and their, socialist agendas from bench from the day he appointed his first federal judge.
We’ve seen more than one judge rule based upon their interpretation of what the Constitution should say instead of what it does say.
There isn’t any place in the Constitution that gives sexual perverts more rights over the majority of normal people, but liberal judges have ruled otherwise.
Now, another federal judge is using her personal views to impact the midterm elections for the betterment of Democrats.
The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Barb Wire.