Are Dr. Archibald’s Child Sex Abuse Photos in Dr. Kinsey’s Indiana University’s Secret Files?

By BarbWire guest contributors Judith A. Reisman, PhD and Mary E. McAlister, Esq.

Former Kinsey Institute Director June Reinisch once stated that she found the Institute’s “collection of child pornography so distasteful… that she cannot bear to look at it.” Newsweek, “Keepers of the Flame,” June 18, 1984, p. 15.

Many hundreds of victims are suing Rockefeller University Hospital (“RUH”) for sex abuse by pediatric endocrinologist Dr. Reginald Archibald (dec.). The victims are especially seeking the whereabouts of photographs taken during their abuse. Would they be among the child pornography collection in what June Reinisch (above) called the Kinsey Institute’s “distasteful” collection?

Dr. Archibald was at RUH from 1941 until 1982 spending two-years at Johns Hopkins, 1946 until 1948. He specialized in treating boys concerned they were too short. Former patients report the doctor sexually abused and photographed them when the children, mostly boys, were between the ages of six and 17 years old.

Trending: 120 Christians Killed in Nigeria and the World Remains Silent

According to the New York Times: “The men all described similar experiences with Dr. Archibald, who would tell them to disrobe when they were alone in his examination room. He would masturbate them or ask them to masturbate, sometimes to ejaculation. The doctor took pictures of them, while they were naked, with a Polaroid camera, and measured their penises both flaccid and erect, the men said.”

Archibald’s “growth” experiments eerily follow Dr. Alfred Kinsey’s “Early Sexual Growth and Activity” experiments in Sexual Behavior in the Human Male (1948). Both deviant doctors were funded by the Rockefeller cabal, at the same time. Dr. Clarence Tripp, Kinsey photographer, admitted he photographed child abuse for Kinsey’s “research”. Kinsey trained pedophiles to “time” children “with stop watches” for “orgasms.” (See Table 34 below). Former Kinsey Institute Director and co-author Paul Gebhard confirmed:

Since sexual experimentation with human infants and children is illegal, we have had to depend upon other sources of data . . .One was a man who had numerous sexual contacts with male and female infants and children and, being of a scientific bent, kept detailed records of each encounter. Some of these sources have added to their written or verbal reports, photographs and, in a few instances, cinema…The techniques involved were self-masturbation by the child, child-child sex play, and adult-child contacts- chiefly manual or oral. (:79)

Gebhard reported that the “scientific” child abuse films and photographs were “put at our disposal.” Archibald’s sex “methodology” mirrored Kinsey’s in the 40s and 50s. Kinsey reports in SBHM that he had full cooperation during those years, by anonymous NYC physicians, sex researchers, psychiatrists, and endocrinologists.

Kinsey wrote, “that there were mature sperm even in the first ejaculation…” based on “certain of our subjects who have observed first ejaculation in a list of several hundred boys.” (:148) Co-author, part time sex and pornography partner (for science), Wardell Pomeroy reported Kinsey:

…believed that students in the field had all been “too prudish” to make an actual investigation of sperm count in early-adolescent males. His own research for the Male volume had produced some material, but not enough. He could report, however, that there were mature sperm even in the first ejaculation, although he did not yet have any actual counts. (:63)

Figure 27 (below) from Sexual Behavior in the Human Male, includes “growth” info on boys age 9 and up, plotting their age of “ejaculation” “onset of growth” “pubic hair” etc., which is a fit with Archibald’s flaccid and erect “measurements” of his boy victims. The abuse and photo techniques reported by both Kinsey and Archibald suggest “scientific” collaboration. This is especially probable as both men were funded by the Rockefeller cabal: Foundation funding Kinsey and the University funding Archibald while the CIA/Indiana U “research” is documented roughly during the 40s to the 70s. Russian-born Nazi collaborators “were denied U.S. entry visas according to Heims, and therefore must have been brought into the U.S. through PROJECT PAPERCLIP or another similar program” funded by the Carnegie and Rockefeller foundations.

The Rockefeller Foundation cites their medical interest in “endocrinology departments in American universities…and the studies of human sexual behavior by Dr. Alfred Kinsey” in The Rockefeller Century. Arguably, some of these experiments were coordinated in light of Dr. Emmanuel Josephson’s accounts of Rockefeller “Internationalist” procedures:

As a matter of practice, grants are not made except to individuals who are known to support Rockefeller causes. The extent of control exercised by Rockefeller dominated foundations over the activities of its grantees is clearly illustrated by the recent action of the Rockefeller dominated Carnegie Endowment For International Peace. It demanded a refund from the American Bar Association of a $15,000 grant made to it for a study of the U.N. Genocide Convention that had been approved by the U.S. Senate, because…the Committee condemned the Convention….(N.Y. Times, Oct. 15 & 20, 1950). “Researches”…are required to make reports favorable to the Rockefeller interests….(:1399)

Since both Kinsey and Archibald were beneficiaries of Rockefeller’s largesse, they would be expected to follow protocols approved by the Foundation and/or University.

Hence the logical place to seek photos of nude children, masturbated and phallically measured, flaccid and erect, in the 1940s – 1950s would be in the secret files at the Kinsey Institute at Indiana University.

However, all directors of the Kinsey Institute have threatened to destroy everything should police attempt to examine their records. Hence, a subpoena should be immediately obtained. Jonathan Gathorne-Hardy, Kinsey biographer, said,

[The Kinsey Institute] already moved Kinsey’s notorious sex-films to a secret location. And they have vowed to destroy painstakingly accumulated material ….if the police arrive with warrants—as the Tate documentary suggests is desirable…I am afraid a lot of material has probably already been destroyed. I think it’s inevitable that things will be got rid of. They are under siege. (:71)

The Rockefeller conglomerate (Foundation & University Hospital) would have reasonably suspected Archibald’s “child growth” study involved sex photos since at least 1981 when I delivered my preliminary findings on Kinsey at Sexuality’s 5th World Congress.

Gebhard admitted that some of [Kinsey’s] experimenters were “participant observers,” since they themselves used “manual and oral techniques” while testing the children….such “records” included films and photographs that were “put at our disposal.” The Kinsey reports claim that at least “317 preadolescents” …. and at least 2,035 child subjects were sexually abused (:13).

At left Figure 27 and at right Table 34, both directly taken from Kinsey’s Male volume (:180). There are likely thousands of photographs of infants and children being sexually abused in the name of science, some of which might have been circulating for years among pedophiles and pederasts, particularly since the dawn of the internet. Child abusers notoriously do not destroy the photos of their victims—but they do hide them.

The victims asking Rockefeller University for answers, deserve to know if they are among the children displayed worldwide and to ensure that any such photos are destroyed. Since the Kinsey Institute has many such child photos and films, subpoenaing the Kinsey Institute is imperative. They should be the first stop in seeking justice for these survivors.

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Barb Wire.

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.