Supreme Court to America – ‘What is truth?’
“What is truth?” A remarkable question considering the occasion and who was asking it.
Is it appropriate for men and women who do not know the truth, nor understand “the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God,” to be adjudicating disputes over the meaning and purpose of marriage, which is plainly understood by simple observance of nature? Whose thinking is so perverted that they will trample Natural Law, the very foundation of American law and jurisprudence? That they will refuse redress of the grievances of American citizens over abuse of their “unalienable rights?”
Marriage was created by God on the Sixth Day as the union of one man and one woman, “male and female created he them,” and thus derives its meaning an purpose from the Creator.
Can truth be altered? Can what is true and become false? Can what is false become true? Is truth swayed by public opinion? Is it decided by ballot referendum? Can it be overturned by a Supreme Court?
Perhaps a majority of Americans are willing to live with “gay marriage,” but will God live with it? Will it keep Him from destroying a people that are willing to live with it, if indeed He destroys nations that tolerate sodomy?
What if the biblical account of the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah by fire and brimstone from heaven is true? Will my denial of it alter history? Can a nation afford not to learn the lessons of history? Can our children and grandchildren afford for us to get it wrong?
If every court in America rules that “gay marriage” is a constitutional “right,” will God soften His position on sodomy? If He says the practice is damnable, is it wise to put Him to the test?
What does nature teach us about sodomy? Is it possible for two animals or two human beings of the same sex to conceive and bear children? What if everyone was “gay?” What would become of society?
Are you willing to bet your eternal soul and your children’s future on a belief that sodomy is as natural a behavior as heterosexual sex? What is natural about sodomy?
Is it okay for Christian parents to send a child to a school where he is taught that sodomy is normal? If it is abnormal, how can it possibly be justifiable?
Why do so many pulpits in America preach around this and other allegedly “controversial” topics including abortion? If silence isn’t tacit approval, then what is it? What if silence in the face of evil is indeed evil? What if God will not hold us guiltless? What if not to act is to act? What if not to speak is to speak? What if the silence of the pulpit cedes society to divine judgment?
What does the significant growth of the Muslim community (Arabic: “Ummah”) and sharp rise in the number of mosques in America, from roughly 1,000 in 2011 to over 2,000 today, portend for homosexuals in the United States? Every major school of Islamic jurisprudence punishes sodomy with lengthy prison terms or death.
Is Islam progressing or regressing? Dr. Salmin Omar, Secretary General of the Muslim Association of Malawi, has recommended imposing the death penalty for homosexuals in the Republic of Malawi. Read more in Pamela Geller’s February 22, 2014 blog post, ‘Kill the Gays’ Law Called for by Muslim Association in Malawi.
Paul the apostle wrote that “the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness, and unrighteousness of men, who hold or suppress the truth in unrighteousness.” (Romans 1:18) If revealed from heaven, what would the wrath of God look like? Perhaps like fire and brimstone. Perhaps like the beheading of infidels in America.
Some might ask, “What is Natural Law? How can anyone but a Supreme Court justice know it, let alone interpret it?” These are questions that assume Natural Law “is above one’s pay grade,” as Barack Obama asserted on August 17, 2008 at a Presidential Forum hosted by Saddleback Church in Lake Forest, California, when Pastor Rick Warren asked him, “At what point does a baby get human rights, in your view?” The answer given was as much a dodge as Pilate’s, and in no way absolved the fifth prefect of the Roman province of Judaea of responsibility for the crucifixion of Jesus, or Barack Obama of responsibility for knowing that life begins at conception:
Well, you know, I think that whether you’re looking at it from a theological perspective or a scientific perspective, answering that question with specificity, you know, is above my pay grade.
Natural Law, the mastery of which does not require a J.D. or any other type of degree, “comes naturally,” and is well within the grasp of every living, breathing human being, so that living breathing High Court jurists who rule in opposition to it are and will forever be without excuse “in the day” Paul wrote about in Romans chapter 2, “when God shall judge the secrets of men by Jesus Christ according to my [Paul’s] gospel.” (Romans 2:16) Members of the Court who opted against hearing the five cases defending the biblical definition of marriage yesterday, judged themselves unworthy of eternal life and condemned the American people to the Divine wrath that is certain to follow the suppression of Natural Law.
At issue before the Court yesterday was whether the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment grants two individuals of the same gender the right to marry, and access to the same benefits that accrue to heterosexual married couples. In refusing to hear cases filed by five states (Indiana, Oklahoma, Utah, Virginia and Wisconsin), the “men in black” effectively washed their hands of their crime and parroted Pilate, “What is truth?”
After lowering the boom on “truth suppressed” (Romans 1:18), Paul cites evidence of Natural Law readily available to every man who is willing to see it, positing that it is so plain and simple even a cave man can master it, including brute beasts who might happen to dress in black robes, exposing them before the eyes of the Supreme Judge from which nothing is hidden, and who holds men and women who wear black robes to a higher standard:
Forasmuch as that, which may be known of God, is manifest in them, for God hath showed it unto them. For the invisible things of him, that is, his eternal power and Godhead, are seen by the creation of the world, being considered in his works, to the intent that they should be without excuse.
The American people who voted for the current White House administration and the legislators who confirmed this administration’s and previous administrations’ activist Supreme Court nominees, gave their hearty approval to homosexual marriage on Monday. Americans who voted for the current Presidential administration or didn’t vote at all in the last two Presidential elections are primarily responsible for the foreign policy that has abetted the rise of the Islamic State (Caliphate) and accompanying Christian genocide in the Middle East. If you voted for this administration, or did not vote, you are responsible for hundreds of thousands of illegal border crossings by foreign nationals, a good many of whom are terrorists, or carrying disease. You are guilty for the decision to remove all U.S. troops from Iraq, effectively wasting the lives of America’s Finest who died fighting for our freedoms. And yes, you are responsible for the failure to defend the American Mainland against an outbreak of Ebola because of the absence of a travel ban from Ebola-ridden countries.
Anyone who has the audacity to pray “Thy Kingdom come, Thy will be done, on earth as it is in heaven,” and then contravene that prayer by voting for candidates who support gay marriage and abortion, and a Presidential administration’s tyrannical policies, is guilty of abetting the absolute despotism, death, and destruction that will follow.
Top 6 on BarbWire.com
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.