All disapproval of homosexuality leads inevitably to hatred, violence, murder and eventually genocide of homosexuals. That’s the unstated premise of all LGBT rhetoric and policy goals and the source of their astonishing and relentless political passion. It is the reason why, for example, “gay” anti-bulling policies require all schoolchildren to be brainwashed to believe that homosexuality is good and normal instead of simply teaching children to respect others despite their differences. And why LGBT activists are pathologically incapable of articulating any objective standard to differentiate “homophobia” from “non-homophobic criticism of homosexuality” (try getting one to do it on the record sometime).
The belief that disapproval leads inevitably to genocide isn’t rational, obviously. It is a paranoid delusion — but one that is mutually shared and reinforced by the leaders and activists of the LGBT community, driving them with such desperate urgency that they vehemently attack any person who dares even to whisper, for example, that marriage is for one man and one woman. From Anita Bryant in the 1970s to Phil Robertson in 2014, any public figure who criticizes so-called “gay rights“ is targeted for personal destruction by LGBT bullies.
In the culture war over homosexuality the LGBT movement is always at work to sell the unstated “disapproval = genocide” narrative by attributing all public resistance to their political agenda to “a climate of hate and fear.” In this strategy, people who oppose them are either intentional haters harboring genocidal intent, or potentially dangerous dupes who have succumbed to the climate of hate and fear created by the evil ones. There is no third category. No legitimate opposition to homosexuality can be admitted, because (in their logic) all disapproval strengthens the evil ones who must be stopped at all costs.
To sell their narrative, the LGBT activists and their allies in media, academia and government, create various forms of “human rights” monitoring organizations whenever and wherever organized opposition to their agenda emerges. They then work together with street activists and political operatives in that community, state or nation to “prove” by fraudulent manipulation of data, that a “climate of hate and fear” has caused increased violence against homosexuals in that jurisdiction.
These “human rights” organizations then use these “official” reports to 1) generate public sympathy for homosexuals as innocent victims of irrational prejudice, 2) smear the leaders of their opposition as haters who want homosexual to be harmed, and 3) to lobby public officials for anti-discrimination laws. In their minds, the end of “protecting” homosexuals justifies their deliberate deception of the public.
It is a highly effective strategy and very difficult to fight, especially if (perhaps more accurately “when”) the “watchdog” media in that jurisdiction is actually a “lapdog” for the LGBT movement. Most “human rights” abuses reported in these campaigns are self-reported but the media never seems to ask whether or to what extent the political self-interest of the self-reporting “victims” invalidates the data.
How could such data not be tainted when the self-reporters are convinced that “homophobia” will kill them if is not stamped out in society? Are homosexuals and homosexualists as a group so scrupulously honest that we can trust them not to manipulate statistics to their political advantage?
No. On the contrary, the enormous propensity for fraud in the LGBT community has been well established and documented. The most outrageous “hate crime” hoaxes in recent years in the United States have nearly all been perpetrated by homosexuals. I have documented some of them here.
Perhaps the best example of LGBT fraud regards it’s most famous “victim” Matthew Shepard. His horrific murder was used as a justification and impetus for a federal hate crimes law, “The Matthew Shepard and James Byrd Hate Crimes Act,” and a nationwide pro-homosexual propaganda campaign for public school children, “The Laramie Project.” After the LGBT movement had exploited Shepards’s death for over ten years as a warning against “homophobic” bigotry, a “gay” journalist finally exposed the crime as an incident of “gay” on “”gay” violence.
As the person most often blamed for creating a climate of hate and fear” around the world, and one who has been a victim of LGBT “hate crimes” hoaxes, as well as a victim of LGBT hate crimes, I have a personal interest in exposing this insidious LGBT strategy as a fraud, but my purpose is to alert pro-family advocates.
To be forewarned is to be forearmed. Never trust the reporting of “human rights” organizations on the issue of “gay rights,” no matter who they are, or who they are blaming. Always challenge the use of such reports by media, government or activists. Always remind people that no such studies can be considered trustworthy unless they are prepared by organizations that are genuinely neutral on the question of so-called “gay rights” and that have thoroughly and honestly addressed the problems of self-interested self-reporters, “hate crimes” hoaxes, and “gay” on “gay” violence in their analysis.
The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Barb Wire.