Google’s Racial War Against Whites?
If the skin color is not important, why is Google giving preeminence to Afrocentrism and black supremacism, which value its own “cultural” color as superior to all other “cultural” colors?
If you defend “Europeancentrism,” it is branded automatically “racist.” But if you defend Afrocentrism (which is synonymous with “blackcentrism,” meaning everything that has the Afro or black “cultural” color is to be in the center of everything) it just fine for the Left and for Google. For them, European in the center is “racism,” just because European is synonymous with white. But Afro in the center is not racism, just because African is synonymous with black.
According to Merriam-Webster Dictionary, racism is “a belief that some races are by nature superior to others; also: discrimination based on such belief.”
Google has been doing it. Not against blacks. Against whites.
Google puts Afrocentrism as superior to others.
Google does discrimination based on such belief.
Google just is not severely chastised, condemned, ostracized and morally and legally lynched by the powerful mainstream media because in the prevalent left-wing media mindset anything done against blacks is a crime and anything done against whites is “long overdue.” The Left believes that whites deserve persecution.
Google and the Left despise America’s spiritual essence.
America has produced so many inventions that America and inventions are almost synonymous.
Since America is mostly white due to her European roots, most American inventors are white.
A study reported by DailyMail gave the reason for the abundant inventiveness in America: Protestantism. DailyMail said that American white Protestants are incredibly creative. More creative than Catholics and Jews.
Is it just incidental that the largest Protestant nation in the world — the United States — is also the most creative nation in the world?
The abundant historical creativeness and inventiveness in the United States is a direct result of its overwhelmingly Protestant white culture.
But Google wants you to see it differently. When you google “white inventors,” many hits in the first page are negatively exotic. Many in the hits are not whites, and many reports on whites in the hits are not positive. (See Google’s results recorded here: http://archive.is/guslk)
The pictures, which should show only white people, mostly depict black people. The most prominent articles portray whites in an inferior and demeaning light.
It seems that whites, in the Google universe, should be taken out of sight. Perhaps they should not exist. Racism is rampant at Google — against whites.
In contrast, when you google “black inventors,” hits are outstandingly positive. Hits, in the first page, show fine reports on blacks. (See Google’s results recorded here: http://archive.is/wq6z5)
The pictures, which should show only black people, actually depict only black people!
Google’s behavior is perfectly consistent with AFROCENTRISM. “Afro,” relating to Africa or blacks. “Centrism,” relating to center. According to the Oxford Dictionary of English, the adjective “Afrocentric” means “regarding African or black culture as pre-eminent.”
To portray European or white culture as pre-eminent, even when it is historically pre-eminent in America and in Europe, is “racism.” But to portray African or black culture as pre-eminent, even when it is historically not pre-eminent in an overwhelmingly European or white culture, is not racism. Protected racism? Protected dishonesty?
Why is Google imposing the Afrocentric trend, which has a destructive trail?
Last week, the Washington Times reported that Bishop James E. Dukes of Chicago’s Liberation Christian Center made headlines for calling on the Chicago mayor to rename Washington Park and remove a statue of the first U.S. president over his ties to slavery. Bishop Dukes, who is a Pentecostal black, told his Facebook flock that “it’s time.”
And yesterday the Washington Times reported that “A monument to Christopher Columbus that was over 200 years old [in Baltimore] was smashed with a sledgehammer Monday morning to combat a ‘culture of white supremacy.’”
Columbus was an Italian explorer and navigator (of Jewish extraction) who discovered America in 1492. His “crime” in an America obsessed with Afrocentrism? He was white.
If even a black Pentecostal bishop wants a statue of white George Washington removed, what expect from Google?
So it is no wonder that whites have been morally and culturally blacklisted by Google not only in English but internationally, including in Brazil. A Google search for white inventors presents dishonest results in the U.S. and internationally.
Why is Google giving preference to Afrocentrism?
Why is Google demoting the rich American white Protestant culture?
Why is Google behaving in a discriminatory way?
Whether Google recognizes it or not, America was founded by white people, who were 98 percent Protestant.
American blacks, who are so proud of their accomplishments, were able to flourish only in a white Protestant culture. If they had never been taken to America as slaves and still lived in Africa, could they have flourished in the same way they flourished in America?
In the 13th century, when white Europe had castles and cities with impressive cathedrals and buildings, black Africa had… almost nothing. A vast continent, larger than Europe, without castles and impressive buildings.
Even though Afrocentrists and black supremacists point to ancient Egypt and its massive pyramids as an example that Africa was superior to the old European castles and buildings, modern studies shatter the Afrocentrists’ Egyptian hope. According to a WND report, “In the first full genome sequencing of ancient Egyptians, spanning a 1,300-year-period dating back to 1400 B.C., scientists have concluded the people of the pharaonic period were more closely related to modern Europeans.”
White Protestant Americans have a colossal legacy of constructions and inventions. To exterminate it from history (and Google) is racism leading, obviously, to cultural genocide.
If Afrocentrists and black supremacists (including Google, which has put black inventors in the center of inventions and above white inventors) want to be honest with themselves, they should move to Africa and live only with what Africans created there.
If they want to be honest with reality, they should recognize that the white Protestant culture in America was and is the best environment for them to flourish.
Yes, there are problems in the U.S. white culture, including racism. Every culture is imperfect. But white Protestant churches have recognized, condemned and fought against racism centuries before Google. And racism is not an exclusive American issue. Even in Africa, there is racism of black tribes against black tribes.
Slavery abolition did not come from Africa or blacks or Google or Afrocentrists or black supremacists. It came from Protestant whites. Even today, there is slavery in Africa — blacks enslaving blacks —, while in the white America they are free.
Prominent whites in the anti-slavery movement, which was white, were Protestants William Wilberforce, Charles Finney, Abraham Lincoln, etc.
Wilberforce created the first law, with international impact, banning slavery over 200 years ago.
The worst kind of white racism in the world history was Nazism, which was not defeated by Africa, or blacks, or Google or Afrocentrists or black supremacists. It was defeated by the United States and the Soviet Union, largely white nations, which were in military alliance against the esoteric, white racism of Nazi Germany.
The main world leaders against Nazism — Protestant Franklin Delano Roosevelt and atheist Josef Stalin — were totally white. There was a difference between them — capitalism and Marxism —, and this difference, hated and loved by blacks, was born in Europe. The Democratic and Republican systems were also created in Europe.
Even in South Africa, racism was defeated only after a powerful pressure from the white America, white Europe and white Soviet Union.
So whites are in an excellent position to speak against racism, because they have fought racism among themselves as no other race has ever fought.
White Protestant Americans and English Protestant Europeans banned slavery in their white nations and also in many black nations in Africa — with no Google help and with no Afrocentric help.
White Protestant Americans and English Protestant Europeans freed white and black slaves — with no Google help and with no Afrocentric help.
Whites are preeminent, as no other race, in the fight against racism and slavery. Even when black leaders are involved in the fight against racism, their fight was inspired and helped by whites. Protestant minister Martin Luther King Jr., who was inspired by the American white socialist Baptist theologian Walter Rauschenbusch, would never have had success without white support. Nelson Mandela, who was inspired by white Karl Marx, would never have had success without white support from Europe, America and the Soviet Union.
If, as Afrocentrists accuse, whites have an eternal debt to blacks over black slavery, and Google is demoting white inventors as a reparative measure, why do not they demand reparations from Muslims nations that were chief slavers for centuries, including selling black slaves to Europeans and Americans? Why does not Google also demote Muslims? Muslims also sold untold thousands of white slaves to Africa.
Why do not Afrocentrists demand reparations from African nations that sold black slaves to Europeans and Americans? Why does not Google also demote such nations in its search engine?
Black slavery would have been impossible without conquering black tribes selling blacks from vanquished tribes to Europeans and Americans. Africa has huge reparations to do to black Americans.
And in the past centuries when conquering black tribes had no Americans and Europeans to sell their black slaves from vanquished tribes, they sold them among themselves. Black selling black. Black buying black. Slavery was too normal in Africa.
Considering that slavery is old and traditional in Africa, could blacks have freed themselves alone without Protestant Americans and English Protestant Europeans? If they had such power, Africa would have no slavery even today.
Could blacks have flourished without the predominant white Protestant culture in the U.S.?
Ku Klux Klan (KKK) is repugnant and should be banned and condemned. Most Protestant whites condemn it. But do Google and most blacks condemn Afrocentrism and black supremacism?
So Afrocentrists and Google have no excuse to use KKK to hide, demote and undervalue factual truths about whites and their obvious positive hegemony in the U.S. inventions. Google has no right to use its search engine as a propaganda machine to promote an Afrocentric ideology against whites in the U.S., Brazil and around the world.
Google’s dishonesty against white inventors is as repugnant as KKK’s dishonesty against blacks.
If Google did to black inventors what it is doing to white inventors, it would be considered sheer racist propaganda. It would be criminal behavior.
Google would go bankrupt if it treated black inventors as it has been treating white inventors.
Google’s war is not only against white inventors. It is also against reality and honesty.
Racism is rampant in a Google search for white inventors, privileging an Afrocentric ideology and demeaning a powerful American creative culture formed by white Protestants.
Portuguese version of this article: A guerra racial do Google contra os brancos?
Top 6 on BarbWire.com
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.