Hillary Can Lie Thrice in a Sentence of Five Words!
My father was an uneducated man having dropped out of school in the sixth grade to provide for his mother and younger siblings during the Great Depression. Dad impressed on me many times that “A man who will lie, will do anything.” A liar will do what he or she must do to cover up the lie.
Hillary Clinton is a known liar with the amazing ability to tell three lies in a five word sentence. Now that takes real talent but is not a prerequisite for the presidency. Most sane people would suggest that it disqualifies one for the job. Moreover, in the past a person with character who was caught in a lie would flee in disgrace to a secluded place for the rest of his or her life. But not today.
Doing research for this article, I was overwhelmed with the volume of supporting evidence confirming Hillary’s tendency to lie. Maybe the childhood rhyme, “Liar, liar, pants on fire” was written in her honor.
New York Times columnist William Safire wrote in 1996, “She is in the longtime habit of lying; and she has never been called to account for lying herself or in suborning lying in her aides and friends.” Safire was writing about Hillary and Bill’s sleazy actions in the infamous Whitewater scheme in Arkansas. He wrote, “Americans of all political persuasions are coming to the sad realization that our First Lady—a woman of undoubted talents who was a role model for many in her generation—is a congenital liar.”
Her lies are often totally unnecessary without any benefit to her–yet she lies. Hillary’s picture should be in the dictionary under “pathological liar.” The definition being “a person who tells lies frequently, with no rational motive for doing so.” That’s Hillary.
And there are scores of examples that clearly confirm Hillary is a liar.
She claimed to be named after Sir Edmund Hillary, the conqueror of Mount Everest; however, she was already 6 years old when he made his famous climb to the top! I should think she would do some simple research before telling her lies.
Hillary’s first important job was to work on the Watergate investigation in 1974 under general counsel and chief of staff of the House Judiciary Committee, John Doar. Jerry Zeifman is a lifelong Democrat who supervised the work of 27-year-old Hillary Rodham on that committee. At the conclusion of the investigation, Zeifman refused to give her a letter of recommendation. Asked why, he replied, “Because she was a liar. She was an unethical, dishonest lawyer. She conspired to violate the Constitution, the rules of the House, the rules of the committee and the rules of confidentiality.” Well, well, well. An honest Democrat with a dishonest employee.
So, her record of lying started early in her life.
Hillary said they were “dead broke” when they left the White House! In June of 2014, she told ABC News, “We came out of the White House not only dead broke, but in debt.” But Diane Sawyer pressed her on their $5 million in speaking fees and could have mentioned their home in Washington’s elite Embassy Row they had purchased for $2.85 million (now worth 5.6 million) just before leaving the White House. Plus, their walled mansion was purchased in 1999 in Chappaqua, N.Y. for $1.7 million (now worth 2.4 million). That new residence permitted her to run for the Senate. No, of course she is not a carpetbagger! A liar but not a carpetbagger.
She lied when she said she stepped out of the airplane in Bosnia and had to “avoid sniper fire after landing.” That was a total fabrication–a lie to add some color to her trip. She said, “I remember landing under sniper fire. There was supposed to be some kind of a greeting ceremony at the airport, but instead we just ran with our heads down to get into the vehicles to get to our base.”
Most of us have seen the video of her arrival that shows her waltzing serenely across the tarmac, waving to the crowd, and receiving flowers from a small girl! However, the “sniper fire” adds more juice to the story.
One of her most infamous lies was her claim that the 2012 attack on the U.S. installation in Benghazi was caused by a “disgusting video.” Everyone involved knew the attack that killed four Americans, including the U.S. Ambassador to Libya, was a Muslim jihadist attack. She told the lie to the grieving relatives of the four victims and now lies about telling the lies.
She said that she did not support NAFTA but she lied again. On November 1, 1996, the news reported that on a trip to Brownsville, Texas, Clinton “touted the president’s support for the North American Free Trade Agreement, saying it would reap widespread benefits in the region.” And the next day the Associated Press reported that Hillary touted the fact that “the president would continue to support economic growth in South Texas through initiatives such as the North American Free Trade Agreement.” She lied and does not support NAFTA now for political reasons. It is normal for politicians to change positions as often as NASCAR drivers do during a 500 mile race but it is dishonest to try to change and deny an original position.
Numerous other lies include: Chelsea was not jogging near the Trade Center on September 11, 2001, but in bed; Hillary said she didn’t know the Peter Paul fundraiser in Hollywood in 2000 cost $700,000 more than she reported; she did not urge Bill to intervene in Rwanda as she said; she did not negotiate the release of refugees in Macedonia–they were released the day before she arrived; she said she had “one device” when she had multiple electronic communication devices; and on and on and on.
Maybe, just maybe it is hyperbolic to accuse her of telling three lies in a sentence of five words, but if it is possible, she can do it.
With Hillary’s record, I would not trust her to walk my dog, let alone be president of the U.S.A.
Boys’ new book Muslim Invasion: The Fuse is Burning! was published recently by BarbWire Books; to get your copy, click here. An eBook edition is also available.
Top 6 on BarbWire.com
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.