Transgenderism — Misogyny Writ Large
By Judith Gelernter Reitman and Mary E. McAlister, Esq. – BarbWire guest contributors
In a recent letter to the WSJ Editor (at this date unpublished) David A. Kallman, Sr. Counsel for the Great Lakes Justice Center in Lansing, Michigan, wrote:
In the controversy over bathrooms/LGBT “rights,” it is curious that companies like Dow Chemical, Alcoa and Monsanto have chosen sides (WSJ 4/18/16), along with Disney, the NBA and NFL…The hysteria and lies from opponents of Religious Freedom Restoration Acts are outrageous….They claim “RFRA is a license to discriminate.”…. RFRA is not a “license” to do anything. It is merely a defense against attempted infringement of religious rights. The bi-partisan Federal RFRA, co-sponsored by Senators Kennedy and Schumer, was supported by numerous liberal and conservative organizations, including the ACLU, American Jewish Committee, National Association of Evangelicals, Baptist Joint Committee, and National Council of Churches.
In the transgender bathroom “rights” controversy, much is at stake….No tolerance exists for anyone who disagrees with “their truth.” Must we all praise a 40 year old cross-dressing man using the women’s’ bathroom as a hero for justice while condemning a teenage girl as a hateful bigot for simply wanting her privacy and safety protected? You decide.
William Wagner, former Federal Magistrate Judge and Constitutional Law Professor, stated: “All states prohibit criminal sexual conduct, e.g., indecent exposure. No civil law purporting to allow such criminal activity protects a perpetrator from prosecution.” Yet, the moral high ground (funnily enough) is claimed by toxic polluters, Dow , Monsanto, and Alcoa. Disney’s employment of child molesters competes with the NBA and NFL’s nasty habit of shielding million-dollar brawny players who beat up women and cheat on child support. The safety of women and children is clearly not the priority of such misogynist bureaucrats. So whose tune are they dancing to? And why? As to the reality of alleged “transgender” persons, lawyers defending the woman suing Planet Fitness did a quick search:
• SAN BERNARDINO CO., CA (2013) – A 46- year-old man cross-dressed as a woman to gain access to a women’s dormitory and other female only facilities to take pictures of women with a cell phone hidden in his purse.
• OLYMPIA, WASHINGTON (2012) – A 45- year-old man, who self-identified as a woman, used all of the woman’s facilities at the Evergreen State College swimming pool. He exposed himself to minor girls from the local area who would use the college’s swimming pool.
• PORTLAND, OREGON (2011) – A convicted sex offender for offenses against children claimed to be a transgender woman and wore a dress to access areas where young girls would change, such as locker rooms and swimming pools.
• PALMDALE, CALIFORNIA (2013) – A 33- year-old man was charged after allegedly dressing as a woman to secretly videotape women using the restroom at Macy’s.
• COLUMBUS, OHIO (2014) – A man was claiming to be a woman to use a cell phone to take pictures of women using the restroom.
• EVERETT, WASHINGTON (2012) – A nontransgender man wore a bra and wig to gain entry to a women’s bathroom at a local community college to take pictures and admitted to using the women’s showers for sexual gratification.
• BIRMINGHAM, ENGLAND (2011) – A student wore a mask and wig to gain entry to a women’s bathroom to spy on women and make recordings of a sexual nature.
• BERKELEY, CALIFORNIA (2010) – A man twice disguised himself as a woman to gain access to the showers of a U.C. Berkeley locker room to take pictures of women.
Instances of cross-dressing men invading women’s privacy illustrates how such obscene conduct threatens the survival instincts of girls and women—normal, real men know this and will protect women and girls at all cost. At this time, the rates of rape of college girls and women (left, NYT) in “higher” education is shocking! It is just such mean spirited men who eventually run major businesses, sports groups, banks, entertainers and politicians, demand that females receive all male sociopaths who “feel” they are women. Really?!
Ivy League professorial elites charged that their reputations are damaged by wrongheaded claims of a campus “rape culture”. This resulted in a Title IX Federal discrimination complaint—Title IX was designed to protect women and girls from discrimination due to their sex. Now however, Title IX is used as a sledgehammer by government bullies to enforce aggression against girls and women, forcing females to abandon safety for aberrant transgender guys.
Get real! A man in a bra and wig with a pair of women’s panties in his pocket was arrested in a women’s bathroom at a community college. He showered earlier in the girl’s locker room for “sexual gratification” (read, apparently masturbating). Another guy dressed as a woman entered a female dormitory at Loma Linda University. A male disguised as a female used a cell phone to photograph women inside a University of California locker room. A similar incident was reported at Purdue University. A search of transgender convicted felons yields scores of cross-dressers arrested for multiple violent crimes (left).
Moreover, the “gender identity” delusion has overtaken non-discrimination policies, student codes of conduct and curriculum everywhere. This recent fraud stands on the previously nonexistent field of “sexology” and on its founder and model Alfred Kinsey and his revolutionary books, Sexual Behavior in the Human Male (1948) and Sexual Behavior in the Human Female (1953). Schools now teach Kinsey’s unscientific gender paradigm; biological gender, gender identity (includes transgender), gender role, and sexual orientation (includes heterosexual, bisexual, and homosexual), new ones added with some degree of regularity.
The promoters of “lgbt History Month” testify that, “Alfred Kinsey is known as the father of sexology. His groundbreaking and controversial research on human sexuality profoundly influenced social and cultural values,” including of course gender fluidity.
This is a screenshot of the lgbt celebratory image of Kinsey and at right, Table 34, (Male volume, p. 180) identifies the atrocities Kinsey committed against infants and children for what he titled alleged “orgasms”. This “crime scene” Table and others like it are never shown by LGBT’s, claiming Kinsey as their hero, model, guru, genius, authority.
Scientific justification for hijacking Title IX from women and girls, stands on the frauds and brutal child sex crimes of Kinsey, “lgbt History Month’s” honored sage. Kinsey’s historic campaign aimed to destroy Judeo-Christian moral law. His success is seen, minimally, in the increased; rape of women/children, sex crime and disease, divorce, male impotence and pornography addiction, etc. Impressive. Dr. Alfred C Kinsey was a closet sadomasochist bi/homosexual, pornographically addicted pederast (or pedophile) whose child sex atrocities became the model for lgbt History and now, international gender law. Kinsey Institute stalwarts soldier on at Indiana University globally educating via the UN with his sociopathic sexuality.
Adopting “gender uncertainty” policies that permit access to vulnerable women and girls provides predators with greater access to victims. Predators can enter the private spaces of opposite sex students without detection if they reject their birth sex or dress in opposite sex clothing. And with the force of law protecting “transgender” students and staff, one is unlikely to report a cross-dressed person for fear of being accused of discrimination. Catch 22. Gotcha!
Remember, U.S. Department of Education, Office for Civil Rights, PROTECTING CIVIL RIGHTS, ADVANCING EQUITY, reports that elementary and secondary students do mimic what they learn, becoming perpetrators. We must revisit the fallout of the obscene sexual revolution in sex ed and pornography—was it the road to sexual liberation or the road to sexual slavery?
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse. Read More