The Faith of Atheists
In honor of the unofficial atheistic National Day of Reason, I submit this essay.
Everyone has faith–even atheists.
Naturally, this observation turns on the definition of faith.
There are different meanings and usage of this word. In a cynical sense, faith is but an excuse to do whatever one desires. Sometimes it refers to an innocuous belief about a trivial subject (“I believe that to be the case.”). Atheists may use the word to describe irrationality—that which has no proof, justification or reason. Or, more humorously: “Faith is believing what you know ain’t so.”
The Webster dictionary has a range of meanings:
“2 a (1) : belief and trust in and loyalty to God (2) : belief in the traditional doctrines of a religion b (1) : firm belief in something for which there is no proof (2) : complete trust
3 : something that is believed especially with strong conviction; especially : a system of religious beliefs”
When it is asserted that atheists have faith, point 3 is in mind. Many atheists have a strong conviction about the non-existence of God or believe in the value of the empirical method, etc. At other times atheists are convinced of the integrity of researchers they quote or the methods they use. Another way to write this is to assert that atheists have a belief—a belief in their worldview. Belief is a synonym for faith. Webster’s definition of belief is similar to faith:
“3 : conviction of the truth of some statement or the reality of some being or phenomenon especially when based on examination of evidence.”
It is interesting that the definition of faith appends “a system of religious beliefs” and the entry on belief omits this phrase. The third definition of faith includes the word belief. And belief should be based on reasonable evidence. (For those more philosophically minded, the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy has an in-depth article on belief—that attitude we have about what we regard as true).
This usage of the word(s) is important because when the claim is made that atheists’ have faith, it is not meant to be a vacuous idea. There is substance to this claim. Faith—conviction or trust based upon reasonable evidence—is common to all mankind because of our finite mind and limited knowledge. We do not know everything there is to know.
And since humans cannot know everything, they must depend upon others in their search for more knowledge. And they must depend upon methods devised by others.
That is faith.
Every human has faith in something or someone.
Atheists implicitly admit this when their guard is down (as I party document here).
So, the debate between Christians and non-Christians is between competing faiths—between different evidences, proofs and justifications and the very philosophy of knowledge and justification itself. What is considered reasonable faith is determined by what one considers reasonable. And that involves a network of inter-related beliefs, each reinforcing the other. This is called a worldview.
It is unfortunate that too many Christians present faith in antithesis to reason. They are using faith in a way that traditional Protestant leaders and creeds have not. Reason is a tool. And its usage and limits is determined by the framework in which it is used and defined.
Yet it is hoped that atheists and others may realize that many a Christian (leader) does believe there are good and sufficient reasons for Christianity and Christianity’s God. Although the faith of a Christian must include trust and rest in Christ, faith as such is not irrational by this definition. When faith is defined as irrational at the outset of a discussion (thus defining out of existence intelligent Christians), it must be vigorously denied.
All men and women believe in truth as they understand it. Atheists have such a faith. And so do Christians. The debate between the two is over which faith is best justified.
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse. Read More