The FRC Action Presidential Voter Guide is Here!
Have you noticed what’s been missing so far in this presidential primary season? Certainly not drama. What’s missing for the most part is substance; where the candidates stand on a plethora of issues.
FRC Action hopes to fill that void as the starting gun sounds to officially begin the presidential primary season, as it releases its 2016 Values Voter Republican Presidential Voter Guide.
After eight years of sustained attack on religious liberty, natural marriage, and unborn children by the Obama administration, it is critical that voters be informed about which Republican candidates are most prepared to not just stop the assaults on our cherished values, but aggressively undo the damage done by Barack Obama’s policies.
This voter guide compiles stated positions of the eleven Republican candidates (Jeb Bush, Ben Carson, Chris Christie, Ted Cruz, Carly Fiorina, Mike Huckabee, John Kasich, Rand Paul, Marco Rubio, Rick Santorum, and Donald Trump).
The eleven questions cover a range of the most pressing moral issues facing our nation. Will the next president repeal ObamaCare and Defund Planned Parenthood? What will be his or her solution to protect religious liberty and prevent the government from discriminating against citizens because of their sincerely held beliefs about marriage, life, and sexuality? Which candidates have not been willing to take a clear public stance on these issues to date?
Use this Voter Guide to help navigate the actual positions that each candidate holds, and feel free to distribute this important information to others you know. While you’re downloading the Guide, you can also watch video of the candidates’ responses to the question of what they would do as president to protect our religious freedom.
Top 6 on BarbWire.com
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.