Anti-Americanism Drives the British Media’s Distorted Portrayal of Guantanamo
The story of Shaker Aamer reveals a great deal about contemporary Britain. Forty-eight years old, he is a native of Saudi Arabia. In the mid-1990s he arrived in Britain, and met and married Zinnira Siddique, which gave him the right to stay indefinitely in the country. In 2001 he and his wife and their three young children moved to Kabul in Afghanistan. Osama bin Laden, al-Qaeda, and the Taliban were already well-known pioneers of armed Islamism, but Shaker Aamer asks to be believed when he says he went to Afghanistan for the sake of living “a simple life.” According to American intelligence, this simple life actually consisted of fighting for al-Qaeda. When bin Laden fled to Pakistan, Aamer went too, but also asks to be believed that this was just a journey that had nothing to do with al-Qaeda.
Captured a few months after 9/11, Aamer was flown to Guantanamo, and there he stayed for 13 years. No official that I know of has explained the failure throughout that time to put him on trial. A reason must exist: perhaps intelligence had to protect its sources, witnesses were unreliable, and of course he may have been the victim of injustice. Guantanamo personnel say he was a cheerleader organizing hunger strikes, “a mastermind” for the hundreds of other Islamists there. Captured al-Qaeda documents instruct prisoners in American hands to assert as a routine that they are tortured.
Sure enough, Aamer further asks to be believed that he has been the victim of persistent torture. Moreover, he says that British intelligence agents took part in torturing him.
Very few people in Britain would think of Aamer as British rather than Saudi. Yet large parts of the media, left as well as right, have found common ground in a campaign for his release. Instead of asking whether Aamer’s account of his ill-treatment is the whole truth and nothing but the truth, the media prefer to present him as a Briton suffering injustice at American hands…
Read full article at National Review
Top 6 on BarbWire.com
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.