Hillary and USA Today Discover Elusive ‘Gay Gene’
An eight-year-old boy declares he “is” homosexual and is worried about his future. And of course, this is New York, so a photographer magically appears to document his pre-pre-adolescent angst.
He should calm down. The wannabe first female president of the recently Constitution-free United States of America, Hillary Clinton, quickly declared her support. She will make sure this “gay” second-grader is protected and enabled in the future to march naked in as many pride parades as he wants. This is America and by golly, it’s the land of the free–and easy.
Hillary has always been truly concerned about children, you see. In her world, it takes a village to raise a child– and it’s apparently critical that the “village” be full of helpful drag queens and consultative child predators.
This vulnerable boy, who might otherwise be collecting frogs, playing cub baseball, and calling girls “yucky,” is instead pre-occupied with same sex attractions and depraved identities– and just where did he pick this up? This is not typical child behavior and these are inappropriate child concerns. Is it possible these “feelings” reflect the twisted desires of adults in his life whose approval he covets, like many impressionable elementary school children?
When counselors see premature sexual preoccupation in children, many immediately suspect early sexual involvement of some type. But official opinion is unlikely to go there now after Obergefell v. Hodges, because that would mean such an identity and the sexual conduct that so quickly follows are not inborn, are not a destiny, are often not inherited but developed in children– unwillingly–and that perhaps the historical and biblical depiction of this conduct is accurate.
Same sex relationships are just as unnecessary and unwise as most cultures and faiths have always depicted them. But try telling that to the Southern Poverty Law Center and other homosexual pressure groups trying to outlaw counseling to help youth overcome these unnatural feelings. My friend Laurie Higgins has documented the well-understood reality of sexual orientation change being ignored by those pushing this agenda on our kids.
No one is officially calling Hillary’s encouragement of homosexual identity and feelings in an eight-year-old child corruption, which is still a crime in most states. But they should be.
She’s not alone in her unverifiable discovery of innate “gay”-ness. Just last week, the editors of USA Today wrote this:
“Modern science has concluded that sexual orientation, like race, is genetically determined and the court held that it deserves the same constitutional protection afforded to other immutable characteristics.”
Say again? What “science”? Quote us chapter and verse. They won’t because they can’t. It doesn’t exist.
Such ignorance is breathtaking when revealed by a major media outlet. What study would that be, exactly? Many researchers have tried but none– none– to date has reached the gold ring. If any had, that person would surely have been awarded the Nobel Prize for science.
There is no record of a Nobel prize for a “gay gene” or anything like it. That’s because most of the studies have fallen dismally flat.
There was that weak study last year noting a tenuous connection between homosexual males and certain genes. The researchers said that genes only played a partial role, however, and reports were quick to explain, that:
“The genes were neither sufficient, nor necessary, to make any of the men gay. The flawed thinking behind a genetic test for sexual orientation is clear from studies of twins, which show that the identical twin of a gay man, who carries an exact replica of his brother’s DNA, is more likely to be straight than gay.”
And author Mark Ellis notes:
“Eight major studies of identical twins in Australia, the U.S., and Scandinavia during the last two decades all arrive at the same conclusion: gays were not born that way.”
So what does cause homosexual feelings? The elephant in the room for many people is child molestation. But America’s major medical groups are now populated with colleagues who profess to be homosexual. How during cocktail party chatter do you ask, “So, who was it who molested you and caused you to develop ‘gay’ feelings? Your older brother? The neighbor teen down the street?”
No, no one is willing to really uncover this subject for true debate in spite of the overwhelming evidence (think, Catholic Church adolescent-boy molestation scandal and cover-up– read the book Goodbye, Good Men by Michael Rose).
Even many professional medical groups are lining up to embrace homosexual identity and behavior in spite of the health challenges, the absence of a genetic indicator and the potential harm to children.
This stellar list includes the American Medical Association and even the American Academy of Pediatrics, which is totally on the “gay-affirming” bandwagon and recommends that pediatricians’ offices be “welcoming” to “sexual minority youth.”
The AAP betrayal of children and support of harmful, high-risk, immoral behaviors is one reason for the formation of the pro-life, pro-family American College of Pediatricians, which still consults actual science on these issues.
And of course, there’s the well-documented decline of the American Psychological Association, which offers a decided yet totally unsubstantiated affirmation of homosexual behavior. Here’s what they say in answer to the question, “What causes a person to have a particular sexual orientation?”
“There is no consensus among scientists about the exact reasons that an individual develops a heterosexual, bisexual, gay or lesbian orientation. Although much research has examined the possible genetic, hormonal, developmental, social and cultural influences on sexual orientation, no findings have emerged that permit scientists to conclude that sexual orientation is determined by any particular factor or factors. Many think that nature and nurture both play complex roles; most people experience little or no sense of choice about their sexual orientation.”
Not only is there no study cited here for a homosexual preference, the APA is apparently mystified by the existence of even a “heterosexual” orientation, despite thousands of years of history, the testimony of human anatomy, and the abracadabra appearance of wondrous beings called “children.” How in the world did this happen?
It’s astonishing that these medical group endorsements contain hints, minus citations, of scientific support. Yet these are not “evidence-based” but “bias-based” platforms as powerful groups bow to the sham claims of an evil movement.
These emperors not only have no clothes, they are missing gonads as well.
The AMA leadership, the AAP executive committee, the APA board, at least some of them surely know that there is no science behind this, yet they prop up this fantasy to the detriment of millions of American children who are being misled down this road to medical, social and spiritual doom.
Talk about a mob mentality.
Hillary Clinton is their perfect candidate– lawless, corrupt and phony to the core. We must bring forward a far better alternative because we owe it to our precious children.
Top 6 on BarbWire.com
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.