Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

Afghanistan’s Weepy, Ex-Warlord VP Is Super Mad At The New York Times


Afghanistan’s ex-warlord vice president almost broke down in tears, and now he’s super mad at The New York Times for exposing it.

The Times published a profile on Abdul Rashid Dostum, divulging he nearly cried in a security council meeting in Kabul, after being ignored by “powerful people.”

Reports The NYT:

“No one returns my calls!” he blurted out to the gathering several weeks ago, according to two people there. “I just want to help this country. The people made me a general, but no one even asks for my advice.”

The Afghan VP took to Facebook to protest the “character assassination,” addressing the crying claim today:

It is unnecessary to prove such claims that the general was on the edge of crying which doesn’t even stick to his personality and nature. General Dostum is a national figure who enjoys enormous support among all Afghans and his passion to bring stability and peace in the country is well regarded among all sphere of the society.

Dostum’s Facebook post was focused on crying, but did not refute the article’s accusation that he played some role in the mass killings that occurred during the Afghan civil war in the 1990s.

Afghanistan President Ashraf Ghani will visit the White House next week.

Follow Erica on Twitter

Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact

BarbWire Books is pleased to announce

Homosexual Agenda and the US Military

Dr. Sonny Hernandez

Homosexual Agenda and the US Military is a field manual for US service members and military chaplains. This Gospel-Centered, polemical book exposes the homosexual agenda that adversely affects Religious Liberty for Christians. There are several homosexual activists that will demand equality and tolerance. However, homosexual activists are not so equal or tolerant towards anyone that disagrees with their position on same sex marriage or transgenderism. They will claim to love all, but they really do not mean all—they mean agenda. This is because the homosexual agenda has a definition for inclusivity—their way or the highway.


Posting Policy

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse. Read More

Don't miss a thing. Sign up for our email newsletter to become a BarbWire insider.

Send this to friend