Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

PornRewire

Has Porn Rewired Our Brains To Accept Immoral Behavior?

The Clash Between Heteronormative and Homonormative Worldviews

By Judith Reisman, Ph.D. and Mary E. McAlister, Esq.BarbWire guest contributors

While exercising in the YWCA, with its multiple TV broadcasts, I was stunned by little girls posturing and “rapping” the “f” word. Minutes later a teaser ad for a “cop” show, an apparently naked person, a leather harnesses over the head, flashed by in a pornographic sadism ritual (at the YWCA!). I now have that “teaser” image in my brain alongside the “f” little girls camping away. And some of you have such unwanted, nonconsensual images, and many others, wired into your brains.

We know that as the brain is wired, we think, feel and often, finally, behave. Behavior and social information sculpt the brain, affecting changes in brain and body, hence in morals and values. So we must ask what social information has transduced into the cellular changes[1] that have so altered the character of men, women and children, as to create creatures, en masse, that did not exist even the darkest days of our past history?

Reisman1

CLICK TO ENLARGE

“When the Defense Department released the results of its anonymous sexual abuse survey this month….roughly 14,000 of the victims were male and 12,000 female, according to a scientific survey sample produced by the Pentagon. For male-on-male assaults, 73 percent happened on base and 26 percent in a combat zone.” [2]

We have been at war before, with resulting rape and abuse, but never have we seen this level of sexual violence—especially against our own.[3] Women offenders were roughly 2 percent–their victims’ gender is unknown. Male victims sustained, rape to “abusive sexual contact…. completed and attempted oral, anal…. penetration with any body part or object.” etc.[4] And, consider the disease, depression, mental breakdowns and suicide that result from such military rape by male comrades.

For this kind of “rape” is not in our military history but in the history of the rewired pornography users’ brain. (A Pentagon cover-up of 5,200 employees who bought child pornography, was halted after 8 months,[5] the daily reports of teachers, men and women, arrested for child abuse, etc., etc.) Despite recent laudable efforts by the Air Force to eliminate pornography, its use in cases of homonormative sodomy is not reported. Use of gay “military” pornography, as in this fully graphic ADVOCATE special, “Military Muscle,” common even ten years ago, is not part of the Pentagon report.

Reisman2A Department of the Army Memo, Punitive Homosexual Separation Synopsis FY89-92, May 27, 1993, reported, “the homosexual sex crime rate is 7.49 times higher than the heterosexual sex crime rate (3.25 per thousand compared to .47 per thousand.)” The Memo reports that of 102 Homosexual Assault Cases:

  • 47 were child victims
  • 5% were AIDS infected offenders
  • 100% involved threats to child victims
  • 84% were nonconsensual sex/rape
  • 12% were off base assaults
  • 62% were unlawful sex with subordinates
  • 18% included violent threats to adults[1]

Moreover, the homonormative pattern of sodomy with the exit and entry of the digestive tract has spread. Boys are reportedly “hazed” in schools as a Florida, “team subjected freshman players to [a**l] penetration…” In Colorado, hazing involved a pencil. In Los Angeles, a broken flag pole. In Iowa, a jump-rope handle. In Missouri, a water bottle. In Vermont, pool cues. In New York City, “You need a good f****ring, you freshman.”

“More and more….male high-school athletes….involves a**l penetration…” Befuddled, “experts see increase in a**l-penetration hazing over a dozen incidents of high school boys being sodomized with foreign objects by their teammates in 2013 alone.

“Illinois….younger members of the team sodomized with a finger.” Colorado “sodomized…on the team bus after having been bound with duct tape.”[2] Can no “experts” connect the dots from male military sodomy to male high school sodomy or does being called “homophobic” silence them? The US Supreme Court legalization of sodomy in Lawrence versus Texas (2003) has resulted in widespread school “sex education,”[3] where children learn how to enjoy “A**l Play 101” in text books and from Planned Parenthood, on its “TEEN HEALTH SOURCE” website:

Backdoor sex. A**l. R**ming. No matter what you call it, a**l play is healthy and normal. It’s a good way to share pleasure and avoid pregnancy, but not everyone is into it. What is a**l play? A**l play is any kind of sexual activity that involves your butt. This can include***[unprintable…and more].

Athlete sodomizers just practice what they learned in sex education. Are we surprised that:

A new study of sexually active British teens reveals of sexually active 16- to 18-year-olds…“few young men or women [sic, boys or girls] reported finding a**l sex pleasurable, and both expected a**l sex to be painful for women.” [sic, girls].

The main reasons given for young people having a**l sex were that men wanted to copy what they saw in pornography, and that ‘it’s tighter’.” [Men] “expect coercion to be part of a**l sex…women being badgered for a**l sex appears to be considered normal….Third is the notion that women who do not enjoy it “are either flawed or keeping their enjoyment secret.”[4]

A**l sodomy–sex with the exit of the digestive tract–has been viewed as deviant, dirty, dangerous, and never heteronormative—the reason for its’ illegality until 2003. It has, however, been homonormative since it is the only method of male on male penetration. Self-Report Data: The Advocate Survey of Sexuality August 23, 1994, reveals some of the painful behaviors admittedly common to the homonormative worldview as reported to The Advocate, the pioneering, mostinfluential and important homonormative publication.

Reisman3

CLICK TO ENLARGE

The information in the following matrix provides an empirical measurement of this homonormative worldview, promoting not only a**l/oral/object sodomy, but masturbation, abortion, child-adult sex, etc.

Instead, the Judeo-Christian heteronormative, worldview opposed such conduct, supporting self-control, chastity until marriage (for all), monogamy, fidelity, etc. Homonormality places sodomy, masturbation, pornography, etc., on the same level as “the marital embrace” (“missionary position”) “eye-to-eye, lip-to-lip, body-to-body coitus” (a feat sadly impossible for homosexuals).

JUDEO CHRISTIAN HETERONORMATIVE VS. HOMONORMATIVE WORLDVIEWS

The matrix ( marks indicate acceptance versus x, rejection below) of 50 sociosexual cultural elements reflect mainstream, scholarly and policy positions in homonormative literature.[1]

The homonormative/pornographic worldview (individuals excepted of course) sees all heteronormative values as antiquated and cruelly restrictive. Even where AIDS is concerned, anal sodomy is still seen as a right, is taught in schools, and its “cure” demanded from society. This is further illustrated in the homonormative push to legalize sodomy (illegal until 2003), same sex marriage, adoption, surrogacy, abortion decisions, military rapes, and other matrix items. The matrix illustrates how all pornography supports a homonormative worldview and conduct, including within apparent heteronormative relations.

The heteronormative worldview ethical and cultural heritage was common until roughly 1960 in mainstream and scholarly literature (e.g.: the Old and New Testaments, Blackstone /American legal history, writings by the Founders, etc.). The resulting data (50/50) times, reflect a 100 percent irreconcilable conflict. This simple analysis requires the reader’s study of the homonormative and heteronormative literature. The matrix can be said to express the essence of two conflicting worldviews.

Key Sociosexual Variables Evidencing Heteronormative vs. Homonormative, Pornographic Worldviews Homonormative Human-Centric Authority, Unchangeable Rights HeteronormativeJudeo-Christian Biblical Authority, Changeable Behaviors
1. Adoption by same-sex couples ×
2. Abortion ×
3. AIDS/STD; State has Duty of Care ×
4. Alcoholism; State has Duty of Care ×
5. Artificial Insemination ×
6. A**l sodomy ×
7. Adultery ×
8. Bigamy/Polyamory/3-way ×
9. Body piercing, tattoos ×
10. Birth illegitimate ×
11. Bisexuality ×
12. Bondage and Discipline ×
13. Capital punishment ×
14. Chastity/virginity ×
15. Child/adult sex ×
16. Condoms for children ×
17. Dial-a-porn/phone sex ×
18. Dildo/ sex paraphernalia ×
19. “Dirty” sex talk ×
20. Drugs/illicit ×
21. Emphasis on sexual organs/size ×
22. Father & Mother essential ×
23. “Hate” crimes, sexual orientation ×
24. Homosexuality ×
25. Incest, consensual ×
26. Judeo-Christianity ×
27. Marriage/monogamy/ fidelity ×
28. Masturbation; self/others ×
29. “Missionary” Position ×
30. Natural birth/no surrogates ×
31. No-fault divorce ×
32. Old age valued, honored ×
33. Orgies ×
34. Oral sodomy ×
35. Orgasms, good any way found ×
36. Pornography ×
37. Prostitution ×
38. Public sex ×
39. Rape laws, restrictive ×
40. Romantic courtship ×
41. Satanic themes/entertainment ×
42. Sexual Sadism ×
43. Seduction laws ×
44. Sex crime laws ×
45. Sex exhibition ×
46. Sex education ×
47. Sexting ×
48. Suicide Right to– (euthanasia) ×
49. Traditional family ×
50. Voyeurism ×

The experiment with a pornographic/homonormative worldview seen above has led our nation and other nations into a very dark place. Indeed, how the brain is wired, sculpted, shapes, without our consent, our thoughts, feelings, and eventually for many of us, how we actually behave.

As we look frankly at advertising, television, and the whole media embrace of pornographic imagery and ideas we find these copycat crimes acted out. The flood of military rapes, schoolroom rapes and the epidemic of child rapes, require an immediate evaluation of how this social information has sculpted the human brain. How have these stimuli, transduced into the cellular changes that have so altered the character of our men, women and children. It is time to return to our imperfect but comparatively civil heteronormative past to try and find ourselves.

1 Russell Fernald, How does Behavior Change, the Brain? http://icb.oxfordjournals.org/content/43/6/771.full.

2 http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/may/20/victims-of-sex-assaults-in-military-are-mostly-sil/#ixzz3HpGLUA7E.

3 J Robert Lilly, Taken by Force: Rape and American GIs in Europe during World War II. Rapes in Germany estimated at11,040.

4 http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/may/20/victims-of-sex-assaults-in-military-are-mostly-sil/#ixzz3HpGLUA7E.

5 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D7n316nGhVo.

6 See, Reisman and Johnson, http://www.drjudithreisman.com/archives/rj%20briefing%20book.pdf. http://www.drjudithreisman.com/archives/regent.pdf.

7 http://www.nj.com/middlesex/index.ssf/2014/10/sayreville_football_hazing_not_unique.html.

8 http://teenhealthsource.com/sex/anal-play-101.

9 http://yourbrainonporn.com/study-anal-heterosex-among-16-18-year-olds-reveals-climate-coercion-influence-porn.

10 See for example, The Gay Rights Platform, 1969, Mark Thompson ed, Long Road To Freedom: Advocate History Of The Gay And Lesbian Movement, 1994; Marshal Kirk & Hunter Madsen, After The Ball: How America Will Conquer Its Fear And Hatred Of Gays In The 90s, 1989, Reisman and Johnson, The Advocate Study, http://www.drjudithreisman.com/archives/rj%20briefing%20book.pdf, 1995.

Dr. Judith Reisman is former principal investigator for the U.S. Department of Justice, Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention study of child sexual abuse and crimes suborned by “soft” pornography, and author of several books, the newest of which is “Sexual Sabotage: How One Mad Scientist Unleashed a Plague of Corruption and Contagion on America.” More is available at Reisman’s website. 

Mary E. McAlister is Senior Litigation Counsel with Liberty Counsel. She has 24 years experience as a litigator, including 10 years specifically litigating constitutional cases addressing pro-life, traditional family and religious freedom issues at all levels of the state and federal courts. Mary earned her JD from UC Berkeley School of Law and her BS from California Polytechnic State University. She is licensed to practice in CA, FL and VA.



 

Posting Policy

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.

Trending Now on BarbWire.com

Send this to a friend