“Demographics is destiny.”

I agree with the above statement.

The pro-homosexual movement will demographically die out since they cannot reproduce children.

By contrast, the pro-traditional marriage movement birth rate is much greater.

Home schooling families have been known to have 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 or even more children. All taught with a biblical worldview of marriage.

Gotta get your facts straight.

You could not adopt children fast enough.

One more thing, immorality never passes by without spiritual consequences.

The spiritual principles of sowing and reaping apply to all humans.

One will eventually reap what one sows.

So go ahead, laugh, live carefree, and mock the moral principles of our a Creator.

Our Creator is a God of love AND holiness.

Easy to laugh in the comfortable surroundings when life is good.

When life is in the crisis mode, as for all of us inevitably, one might be laughing a different tune.

At that time, one will be crying out to our Creator, when our lives are beyond our control. When our days are numbered.

And we look back, with regret…

“It is appointed for a man to die once, and afterwards comes judgment.”
–The Bible

You can ignore it if you wish, my friend. It is entirely your choice!

Take a gamble, if you like. It is entirely your eternal destiny! Not anybody else’s but yours.

After one dies, then it is too late!

Choose wisely!

Peace.

Thank you, my friend, for acknowledging that my point has been received.

I’ve seen Death’s stare twice now, and that’s not been the case for me, at all.

I was beaten at the hands of six men. In the hospital for three days. Lost enough blood that I nearly needed a transfusion. They seriously thought they were going to lose me.

Though all of that and facing death, I never once reached out for nor cried out for our “creator” to help me, or save me. I’m still here simply because of my determination to live

And just as “perhaps” God had NOTHING to do with it. I feel no special relationship with a God as portrayed by most “Christians” – especially of the variety who visit hear.

I’m perfectly comfortable that when I do finally pass from this existence, I’ll have my opportunity to make my case and that it will NOT involve me having to heel at the alter of an omnipresent “God”.

What I reject is your opinion and version of reality. I substitute it with my own, as was once quoted by someone I don’t know.

Again, it is your eternal destiny, not mine.

Believe and choose what you want.

Be as comfortable as the frog sitting in a simmering pot of water gradually getting hotter.

Just sounding the alarm. It is your decision to jump out or continue sitting there.

Peace.

being on this side of death does not mean we have experienced any personal knowledge of the OTHER side of death.

…or any personal knowledge of a deity.

Again, so confident that twice an experience guarantees a similar third response.

After seeing only a handful of your interactive stylings, I’m fairly confident that contemplating mortality would be far more pleasant and edifying than being in the same room as you.

If their children see dad put his penis up dad’s anus, what will they think is the purpose of that, and where does that act lead?

Is there a point to anal sex? Procreation?

Could ask all the opposite sex couples that engage in the practice as well as male-male same-sex couples. In fact, as part of the abstinence message put forward by the religionists to preserve sexual “purity” anal and fellatio are the two approved substitutes suggested to young men and women.

Remember, intercourse is not just for procreation. It is when two adults love each other and … 😉

More precisely, the LGBT community will not, WILL NOT, under any circumstances be relegated any more to second class citizen status and be treated with disfavor under the law. Discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity will no longer be tolerated.

Patriotic, tax-paying citizens who are upstanding members of the nation will no longer have their lives ruined and turned upside down by theocratic jackboots who trample rights with their thuggery. Pluralism is the hallmark of our diversity and strength and this genie cannot be put back into the bottle.

Well, it actually does. What pluralism does NOT support is one particular variant of Christianity over all others and to the EXCLUSION of all others.

Your side wants a buffet where there is only ONE choice in each of the chafing dishes. Pluralism states that there can be multiple choices and the individual is free to choose. It is that freedom to choose, the fact that it is NOT restricted to comport with your view of religion that is so galling to you and your ilk.

Shockingly, you will have to share this country with unbelievers, idolatrous cultists, apostate Christians, and a HOST of others who could not disagree more with your side’s viewpoint of the LGBT community and civil rights. Guess a civics class is in order. LOL.

Would that be the “horror” of actually having to see a round blue sticker on a business stating “If you’re buying, we’re selling” and a pride flag showing solidarity ? That egregious discrimination ?

Wow, wonder when the support group is going to be formed. All that PTSD. All that hurt. (sniffle, sniffle).

(Yawn.)

Hard to say.

We don’t seem to have a problem with this. Sounds more like you’re describing militant homosexuals than us.

Not sure whose liberty is being “repressed” as we all have full knowledge of your position. What is galling is the REJECTION of your position. Or, that your position does not have “most favored” status or is the ONLY position.

And, reasonable people can disagree as to what is “good for our nation.” Many would state that equal treatment under the law is precisely what is good for our nation. Absence of discrimination. Equal pay for equal work. All that stuff.

LOL. Ah yes, the “floodgates” argument.

Never gets old. Ha ha ha.

Nah, those are all nonsensical arguments that do not rise to the level of being worthy of a reply. Also, they are not the issue at hand.

If the polygamists and bovine lovers want to make a case to the electorate, they are certainly welcome to do so. Absent any political groundswell to allow such couplings, they are merely the feeble attempts of the desperate to try to stop the juggernaut of same-sex marriage and subject every single citizen to the theocratic jackboot of tyranny.

Meh. So predictable. Really ? What is next ? Will we be forced under penalty of law to say NICE THINGS about the religionists ? Vow fealty in order to vote or own property ?

We know it is coming. The theocrats want NOTHING LESS.

A cow? And did said, cow, agree to this marriage? And did said, cow, sign an application for a wedding license?

See how easy it is to beat back these red herrings?

Uum…. yeah, actually I did. It doesn’t even show up.

Just for argument’s sake…
Whoever said that consent from a cow was required?

An unborn baby can be aborted without his/her consent.

On BeyondMarriage DOT Org homosexual leaders endorse polygamy

On BeyondMarriage DOT Org homosexual leaders endorse polygamy.

The practice of your “nobility” is the bane of my own beliefs.

Constitutionally then, how is it that your beliefs should trump that of mine, or vice verse?

You’re are simply an egocentric selfish person. A direct reflection of your first premise.

Misrepresented conclusion.

That was not an attack. It was a redirected view point meant to show that your position is not the ONLY position that can be right. That’s all.

Seriously?

It was no more an “attack” than what you posited in your OWN comment:

trueWorldview: “Promote immorality at all costs, for all selfish reasons, without regard to the good of our nation.”

It was a parallel track of thinking. If you don’t know the difference between an Ad Hominem attack and a parallel to ‘undermine’ your thoughts – which is NOT and Ad Hominem, well that’s just too sad for you, I’m sure.

Read into it whatever you wish. I know what I meant and I believe it is a clear example of parallel thinking from an opposing point of view which was only to serve as an example of how absurd your position was.

Now I suppose you’ll take that, too, as a “personal attack”?

Truly, grow a thicker skin.

No backtracking here.

Mine was a statement of factual interpretation of a non- factual statement that was also illogical – that would be yours. Hence no Ad Hominem could exist.

BTW – make no misunderstanding. I most certainly am NOT your “friend”. That is such an overly cliched and misused idiom.

Okay, so we’ll follow your ‘logic’. He’s wrong therefore I’m right……. by default.

Yes, that’s pretty much what I said, but if you want to invoke “the word of God” to reinforce my point, who am I to argue?

So again, you are saying, that Americas ultimate destruction is inevitable, because unhindered immorality is a right?

That’s not true at all. Two viewpoints cannot “coexist.”
For example:
In public schools across our nation, school children are taught that homosexuality is perfectly normal and acceptable–and school children are not permitted to speak a word against homosexuality without fear of punishment.
Another example,
Homosexuals are unwilling to “coexist” with small business owners who are willing to serve homosexuals anything they want except serve their so-called “gay weddings”.
Oh, and of course,
Homosexuals are certainly unwilling to “coexist” with the viewpoint expressed by Scott Lively!

LOL!
You said “two viewpoints (on homosexuality) will continue to coexist with equal validity.” I point out three examples of how that is not at all true…and you call that..”straw-man” arguments! How ridiculous.

I wonder how well Islams viewpoints will coexist once they make their final push for Sharia Law in this great land of pluralism and multiplicity? I’m thinking something like Iraq and Syria

Gay fascists like you are anti-Christian and never protest against Islam. How’s your friend Floyd Corkins?

How are your friends in Center City? How are your friends Jessica Dutro and Ronnie Paris Sr?

I have no less loathing for Islamic extremism than I do for Christian extremism.

I really don’t know, and I suspect that the people involved in both cases were completely nuts. That being said, I’m not going to rule it out as impossible for them to have strongly suspected that their sons were gay as they may well have been non-gender conforming, which is one of the biggest predictors of homosexuality. (I knew, for example, that I was gay when I was four, but I never told my parents and have always been very gender conforming, so there were few signs.) Of course, non-gender conformance doesn’t indicate that they necessarily were gay.

All that being said, it is not fair to judge an entire group based on the actions of a few insane people. Judging LGBT people and the efforts of the HRC and SPLC on the actions of idiot trash Floyd Corkins is no better than comparing all of the Christian right to people like this.

hrc is fighting for and promoting immorality. They also are promoting pedophilia.