rainbow_jail1

Child Molestation and the Homosexual Movement

avatar
Print Friendly and PDF

[Editor’s note:  The following article was originally published in 2002 by the Regent University Law Review.  Upon publication, it created a firestorm of controversy even though over 40 of the sources cited are from pro-homosexual articles, films, books, and statements.  The author, Steve Baldwin, was able to demonstrate conclusively that there is a element of the homosexual culture that thrives on underage boys and that homosexuals are committing pedophilia at a far higher rate than are heterosexuals.  Indeed, those who attempted to bring reprints of this article into Canada were stopped and questioned and all copies of this piece were confiscated.  Meanwhile, Canada routinely allows pornography of all types into the country.  Even though this piece was published 12 years ago, Baldwin’s theses remains valid.  Indeed, in the news right now are exposes about homosexual pedophile rings in Hollywood while all over the world movements to lower the age of consent are being led my mainstream homosexuals in order to give them legal access to young boys.]

Lately, the gay movement seems to be making large gains in its war on America’s Judeo-Christian culture. Gay characters have become the norm on sitcoms; it has become fashionable to attack the Boy Scouts; homosexual propaganda inundates many of our public schools, nearly all the mainstream religious denominations have “revised” their understanding of Biblical teaching concerning homosexuality and the gay “rights” legislative agenda is succeeding beyond the advocate’s wildest imaginations.

And yet the destructive impact homosexuality has upon Western Civilization is rarely discussed by columnists, reporters, religious leaders, politicians or by anyone for that matter. Even some conservative publications have decided to ignore the issue and incredibly, have even published articles arguing for more tolerance toward the gay lifestyle.

Indeed, on the homosexual issue, conservatives seem divided between those who have a “live and let live” attitude and those who have reached the conclusion that the homosexual agenda will have to be curtailed if we are to survive as a Judeo-Christian culture. However, the reality is that there is overwhelming evidence in support of the notion that homosexuality is a sexual deviancy often accompanied by disorders that have dire consequences for our culture. A vast amount of data demonstrating the deviant nature of the gay lifestyle has been amassed but is being ignored by the media and most of the leadership of the psychological, psychiatric, and medical professions.

It is difficult to convey the dark side of the homosexual culture without appearing harsh, but the time has come to acknowledge that many of the behaviors engaged in by homosexuals threaten the very foundation of Western civilization – the nuclear family. The most obvious manifestation of the attack on the family unit is the homosexual community’s efforts to target children, both for their own sexual pleasures and for purposes of enlarging the homosexual movement. The homosexual community and its media allies have long scoffed at this line of argument, insisting that this is the same old worn out right-wing tactic to demonize the homosexual movement and that, after all, heterosexual molestation is a far more serious problem.

Unfortunately, the truth, as they say, is stranger than fiction. Not only does the research confirm that homosexuals molest children at a rate vastly higher than heterosexual molesters, but mainstream homosexual publications, literature, conferences and books commonly promote sex with children. (1) Furthermore, homosexual leaders have repeatedly argued for the freedom to engage in, as they say, “consensual” sex with children, and blind surveys of homosexuals reveal a shockingly high number admit to having sex with minors. (2) Indeed, it is the homosexual community that is driving the worldwide campaign to lower the age of consent laws.

Needless to say, this trend comes at the expense of our children’s safety as exemplified by the incident in Los Angles involving group homes operated by the Gay and Lesbian Adolescent Social Services (GLASS). GLASS received taxpayer monies to take in troubled youth, usually referred to them by the social service departments of various Southern California counties. (3)

GLASS’s own website should have been warning enough. GLASS believes that some children are born gay — a view not backed by any science — and announced that its target was “youth who are confused about their psychosexual identities…” (4) Its web site was linked to a myriad of gay sites that target youth including a site promoting a book, Public Sex: The Culture of Radical Sex, which promote sex with children. GLASS’s founder and former executive director, Teresa DeCrescenzo, authored books about helping youth “discover” their homosexuality. (5)

It shouldn’t have come as a surprise when the California State Department of Social Services found that, “on numerous occasions beginning at least as early as l994, adults affiliated with GLASS, including staff members, members of the GLASS board of directors and volunteers, sexually abused or molested children who were placed with GLASS…” (6) The Department of

Social Services also documented that DeCrescenzo knew of the molestation but had “concluded that there was no inappropriate conduct.” (7) Apparently, DeCrescenzo believes that molestation is part of the “coming out” process that she glorifies in her writings.

One would think that a molestation factory disguised as a group home would be a good reason for the State of California to shut down the whole GLASS group home operation. Instead, the State merely removed a few individuals and put GLASS on probation, allowing them to continue operating. (8) Incredibly, even though additional molestation incidents occurred at GLASS facilities in 1999, they remain in operation until this day.

A Los Angeles Times investigation found that “in some cases, however, it appears authorities never fully investigated those reports.” (9) Indeed, not one person has been charged with child molestation or endangerment by state Attorney General Bill Lockyer, an avid promoter of the gay agenda. (10) After all, that would be hateful. There is no doubt that if such a group home were operated by heterosexuals, all the facilities would be shut down, its license revoked and numerous people convicted and put behind bars.

But it is not just youth group homes that are targeted by homosexuals but all groups that work with youth. When a California family sued the Scouts in 1993 for exposing their son to a Scout leader who molested him, the Scouts were ordered to turn over 25,000 pages of documents to the plaintiff. This unprecedented glimpse into the world of scout pedophiles revealed that thousands of boys had been molested by Scout leaders and other volunteers between 1971 and 1991 resulting in the expulsion of over 1,800 Scout volunteers for pedophile activity. (11) The documents show that some Scout leaders molested over forty boys before getting caught and that many, once caught, simply moved to a different Scout troop and continued abusing boys.

Gay activists, however, have spun the Scout molestation epidemic as a heterosexual problem, but examination of many of the higher profile cases reveal that Scout molesters are attracted exclusively to boys and many lead mainstream gay lifestyles. John Hemstreet is typical. Hemstreet is a convicted child molester, former Boy Scout leader, and currently the President of the Toledo, Ohio chapter of Parents and Friends of Lesbians and Gays (PFLAG), one of the   groups leading the nationwide attack on the Boy Scouts. (12)

Incredibly, the pro-pedophile group, North American Man Boy Love Association (NAMBLA), which calls itself a homosexual group, wrote a letter to the national Scout office urging “the Boy Scouts of America to cease its discrimination against openly gay or lesbian persons in the appointment of its scout masters. This will permit more of those individuals who genuinely wish to serve boys to do so.”

Using twisted logic, pro-gay academics have argued in various social science journals that the molestation of boys is not a gay lifestyle issue and that such men are not really homosexuals. It is simply amazing that gay propagandists and sexology “experts” have successfully bamboozled the public and the media into believing that an exclusive focus on young males should not be defined as homosexuality! But if an exclusive attraction to males – of any age – is not homosexuality, then what is?

But while on one hand, homosexuals publicly claim that the molestation of boys is not part of the homosexual lifestyle, they are quietly establishing the legal parameters to allow the molestation of boys to be exempt from prosecution on supposedly anti-discrimination grounds. In Nevada, for example, a 42-year-old man was arrested for molesting a 16-year-old boy but was not charged by the district attorney because to do so would “discriminate against a class of people.” The deputy district attorney added that to charge the man “would be singling out homosexuals.” For years, conservatives have argued that so called anti-discrimination laws would eventually lead to granting legal protections for various homosexual deviancies; it appears that that time is coming sooner than expected.

Research on the homosexual lifestyle confirm it is almost exclusively a “youth oriented” culture.

Very few gays exhibit a preference for older men. Some admit to a focus on teenage boys; some on prepubescent boys; and many cross over between categories – but all are subsets of the homosexual deviancy. Moreover, most pedophiles consider themselves to be gay. In a 1988 study published in the Archives of Sexual Behavior, “86% [of pedophiles] described themselves as homosexual or bisexual.” (13) Child prostitution expert Dr. Jennifer James reports that the number of boy prostitutes who identify themselves as “homosexuals” has risen from 10% to 60% in the last 15 years.

Most of the public is by now aware of NAMBLA, a group that openly promotes sex with minor boys and claims that “Boy-lovers respond to the needs of the boys they love.” NAMBLA is currently the target of a class action lawsuit by parents of children molested – and in one case, murdered – by individuals associated with NAMBLA. (14) Publicly, the mainstream gay organizations distance themselves from NAMBLA, but, clearly, this is merely a public relations ploy as the gay leadership realizes its agenda would suffer greatly if the public knew the truth.

The reality is that NAMBLA not only describes itself as part of the gay rights coalition, but its literature states one of its goals is “cooperating with the lesbian, gay, and other movements for sexual liberation.” (15) NAMBLA even “provides financial and other assistance to GLB [Gay, lesbian, bi-sexual] youth organizations. “ (16) Indeed, most NAMBLA chapters meet at mainstream gay centers such as Philadelphia’s Gay and Lesbian Community Center and its meetings and conferences always feature mainstream gay leaders and speakers. For example, Don Kilhefner of the Los Angeles Gay Community Service Center gave a speech to Los Angeles NAMBLA members on the subject of “The Significance of Man/Boy Love in the Gay Community.”

The most comprehensive gay networking website, the Queer Resource Directory, links every gay group in the country including NAMBLA and other homosexual groups that focus on youth (www.qrd.org/qrd/orgs/NAMBLA). NAMBLA marches in gay pride parades with the consent of the gay leadership. Many of the homosexual movement’s most prominent leaders endorse NAMBLA and its goals. Gay authors and leaders Allen Ginsberg, Gayle Rubin, Larry Kramer (founder of ACT-UP), Pat Califia, Jane Rule, Michael Kearns, and Michel Foucault, have all written in favor of NAMBLA and/or man-boy “relationships.” (17) Harry Hay, whom many consider the founder of the American homosexual movement, invited NAMBLA members to march with him in the 1993 “March on Washington” gay rights parade. Hay held a sign that read “NAMBLA walks with me.” (18)

Leading mainstream homosexual newspapers and magazines such as the Advocate, Edge, Metroline, The Guide, and the San Francisco Sentinel have not only published pro-NAMBLA articles and columns but many have editorialized in favor of NAMBLA and sex with children. The editor of The Guide – Ed Hougen – stated in an interview with Lambda Report that, “I believe they [NAMBLA] are generally interested in the right of young people to be sexual…I am glad there is a group like NAMBLA that is willing to be courageous….” The Sentinel was more blunt: “NAMBLA’s position on sex is not unreasonable, just unpopular…when a 14 year old gay boy approaches a man for sex, it’s because he wants sex with a man.” (19)

Then there is the matter of NAMBLA’s membership status in the International Lesbian and Gay Association (ILGA), recognized at one time by the United Nations as the official “Non-Government Organization (NGO)” representing the gay community worldwide. When NAMBLA’s ILGA membership became public, a whirlwind of international controversy erupted that some gay leaders viewed as harmful to the gay movement’s image and goals. As a result, some gay leaders urged the expulsion of NAMBLA for purely image purposes.

However, the media failed to report that ILGA itself had hosted workshops on pedophilia and passed resolutions in 1985, 1988, and 1990 to abolish age of consent laws, claiming that “same sex age of consent laws often operate to oppress and not to protect” and supported “the right of every individual, regardless of age, to explore and develop her or his sexuality.” (20)

Eventually, reacting to congressional legislation threatening the reduction of $119 million in financial support, the United Nations kicked out ILGA in 1995 for refusing to sever ties with a half dozen member groups that advocated or promoted pedophilia. Revealingly, even though ILGA did expel NAMBLA – many say it was for show — it could not muster enough support among its membership to expel other more powerful – and more discreet – pro-pedophile organizations from Germany and other countries. It is extremely revealing that the majority of the world’s leading homosexual coalition, the ILGA, decided they would rather be excluded from UN deliberations than vote out groups that advocate sex with children.

Aside from support for NAMBLA by the mainstream gay community, there is a wealth of evidence that homosexuals are the prime force behind the escalating child molestation epidemic. Indeed, over the last 15 years the homosexual community and its academic allies have published a large quantity of articles that claim sex with children is not only not harmful but, as stated in one homosexual journal, “constitute an aspect of gay and lesbian life.” (21) Such articles have appeared in pro-homosexual academic journals such as The Journal of Homosexuality, The Journal of Sex Research, Archives of Sexual Behavior, and The International Journal of Medicine and Law. The editorial board of the leading pedophile academic journal, Paidika, is dominated by prominent homosexual scholars such as San Francisco State University professor John DeCecco, who happens to edit the Journal of Homosexuality.

Indeed, the Journal of Homosexuality is the premier academic journal of the mainstream homosexual world and yet it published a special double issue entitled, Male Intergenerational Intimacy, containing dozens of articles portraying sex between men and minor boys as “loving” relationships. One article states that parents should view the pedophile who loves their son “not as a rival or competitor, not as a theft of their property, but as a partner in the boy’s upbringing, someone to be welcomed into their home…”

Similarly, mainstream gay publications make no effort to hide its pro-pedophilia views. For example, BLK, a leading black homosexual publication, defended pedophilia with an article entitled, Must Men who Love Boys Be Guilty of Sexual Misconduct?   San Francisco’s leading homosexual newspaper, The Sentinel, bluntly editorialized that, “The love between man and boys is at the foundation of homosexuality.”   (22)

In 1995, the homosexual magazine Guide, stated, “We can be proud that the gay movement has been home to the few voices who have had the courage to say out loud that children are naturally sexual, that they deserve the right to sexual expression with whoever they choose…. we must listen to our prophets. Instead of fearing being labeled pedophiles, we must proudly proclaim that sex is good, including children’s sexuality…We must do it for the children’s sake.” That’s right, the Guide is saying that gays must molest children for their own sake!

While the mainstream media has apparently refused to engage in any kind of investigative expose of the gay movement, it is not difficult to find support for child sex among key homosexual leaders if one searches their publications and literature. For example, the founder of the infamous homosexual group, ACT-UP, Larry Kramer, wrote in his book, Report form the Holocaust: The Making of an AIDS Activist, “In those instances where children do have sex with their homosexual elders, be they teachers or anyone else, I submit that often, very often, the child desires the activity, and perhaps even solicits it.” In a letter to the editor of a gay newspaper, Andy Humm, a key leader of one of America’s largest gay youth groups, Advocates for Youth, said, “no one should be denied basic civil rights because of his or her orientation, whether the person be homosexual, heterosexual, transsexual, transvestite, pedophile, sadist, masochist, asexual, whatever one can imagine… They are in themselves natural variations.”

A 1995 content analysis by Dr. Judith Reisman of the Institute for Media Education, focusing on advertisements in the nation’s most influential homosexual newspaper, The Advocate, reveals that 63% of the personal ads sought or offered prostitution; many of them openly soliciting boys. The Advocate also advertises a “penetrable boy doll – available in 3 provocative positions.” Reisman found that the number of erotic boy images per issue of The Advocate averaged 26.7. (23) Some homosexual publications, such as the southern Californian newspaper Update, are brazen enough to have ads asking for donations for the legal costs of homosexuals arrested for child molestation.

Indeed, NAMBLA and other pro-pedophile literature can be found wherever homosexuals congregate — homosexual bookstores, bathhouses, festivals, gay bars, etc. When Americans for Truth About Homosexuality leader Peter LaBarbera asked one of Boston’s leading gay book stores – Glad Day Bookshop — to quit selling pedophile literature, the Manager replied that “our policy is to sell everything that’s available to the [gay] community.”

The most popular gay fiction books on the market today are “rich with idyllic accounts of ‘intergenerational relationships,’” according to writer Philip Guichard in an Village Voice article. Doubleday published a book in 1998, The Gay Canon: Great Books Every Gay Man Should Read, which recommends numerous works that portray sex with boys in a positive manner. The Border bookstore chain sells A History of Gay Literature: The Male Tradition, which includes a chapter devoted to the history of pro-pedophile literature as an undisputable part of homosexual literature history.

The Gay Men’s Press publishes a bestsellers list on which appear Dares to Speak: History and Contemporary Perspectives on Boy-Love, Some Boys, and For a Lost Soldier; all books that can only be described as pro-pedophile. The authoritative Encyclopedia of Homosexuality states that, “the fact that until recently man/boy love relationships were accepted as a part, and indeed were a major part, of male homosexuality.” (24) The leading dictionary of the homosexual culture, The Queen’s Vernacular, lists 254 of its 12,000 words as having to do with sex with boys.

One of the nation’s largest publishers of homosexual literature and books, Alyson Publications, also publishes pro-pedophile books such as The Age Taboo and Gay Sex: A Manual for Men Who Love Men. The latter contains detailed instructions for homosexuals on how to avoid discovery and arrest when having sex with boys: “Avoid situations where a number of men are having sex with the same boy, or group of boys, over a period of time.” Unknown to most people, Alyson Publications is also probably America’s largest provider of pro-gay literature and reading material to public schools, a market that is growing at a tremendous pace. The infamous Heather has Two Mommies was an Alyson Publications book.

Even the alleged birthplace of the modern day homosexual movement, the Stonewall Bar in New York City, was notorious as a place where older homosexuals arranged to meet young boys for sex.

“Mainstream” homosexual conferences now commonly feature speeches about “intergenerational sex,” as it’s now called. For example, at one the nation’s largest homosexual gatherings, the annual National Gay Lesbian Task Force convention, featured a workshop at its 2001 confab titled, “Your Eyes Say Yes But the Law Says No,” which included a speech by a S&M activist about laws affecting ‘‘intergenerational sex.” The convention also featured another workshop titled “Drag 101: How to Turn Kids in Make-up into Kings and Queens.”

Pick up any gay newspaper or gay travel publication and one find ads for sex tours to Burma, Philippines, Sri Lanka, Thailand, and other countries infamous for boy prostitution. Published exposes on such tours by former homosexuals reveal that thousands of American gay men are patronizing boy prostitutes around the world. The most popular travel guide for homosexuals, Spartacus Gay Guides, is replete with information about where to find boys for sex and, as a friendly warning, lists penalties in various countries for sodomy with boys if caught.

The government of Sri Lanka announced that more than 10,000 boy prostitutes work its beaches as a result of the high demand created by affluent Western homosexuals. But the dirty little secret of the American homosexual community is the thousands of boy prostitutes that service them within our borders. A book exposing the boy prostitution world, For Money or Love, Boy Prostitution in America, reveals that “perhaps half of the million runaway boys in the country (ages 10 to 16) are peddling their bodies to ‘chicken hawks’-older men who lust for ‘chicken’ (boys).” (25)

Homosexual internet sites aren’t any different. A quick search using the words “gay” and “boys” easily locates thousands of homosexual sites that promote sex with young boys and/or contain child pornography. Indeed, when the state of Virginia passed a law in 2001 that restricted internet activity considered harmful to children such as chat rooms used by pedophiles to find victims, it was the mainstream homosexual groups who filed suit to block it. Similarly, when a pedophile was convicted in Iowa for showing pornographic videos to five minor boys in his apartment, the conviction was appealed all the way to the State Supreme Court which upheld the ruling, sparking widespread protests from homosexual activists.

The Holy Grail of the pedophile movement is the lowering or elimination of all age of consent laws but the main warriors in this political and legal battle are “mainstream” homosexual groups. Robert Knight and Frank York of the Family Research Council have thoroughly documented this in a report, Homosexual Activists Work to Lower the Age of Sexual Consent. As far back as 1972, the National Coalition of Gay Organizations adopted a gay rights platform that included a demand to “repeal all laws governing the age of sexual consent.” (26)

It is homosexual activists within the United Nations who are lobbying to give “sexual rights” to underage children. In England, the campaign is being led by Outrage! and Stonewall, both homosexual organizations. The Dutch homosexual group, Association for the Integration of Homosexuality, has succeeded in lowering the age of legal sex to 12 in Holland. Assisting them was another homosexual group, the COC, which stated, “The liberation of pedophilia must be viewed as a gay issue….[and that] ages of consent should therefore be abolished….by acknowledging the affinity between homosexuality and pedophilia, the COC has quite possible made it easier for homosexual adults to become more sensitive to the erotic desires of younger members of their sex, thereby broadening gay identity.”

In Canada, the effort is led by homosexual activist and NAMBLA defender Gerald Hannon.

In America, aside from NAMBLA, the effort is supported by most of the major homosexual organizations such as the National Gay Task Force. Indeed, the annual homosexual “March on Washington” invariably releases a “statement of demands” which includes abolishing age of consent laws. Homosexuals in Hawaii have already successfully lowered the age of consent there to 14. To be frank, it is difficult to find an advocate of lowering the age of consent laws in the United States or elsewhere who is not a homosexual activist.

What then does the academic literature say about the relationship between homosexuality and child molestation? Quite a bit, actually. Scientific studies of homosexuals confirm a strong pedophilic predisposition.

Family Research Institute founder and psychologist Paul Cameron reviewed over 19 different academic reports and peer reviewed studies in an 1985 Psychological Reports article and found rather conclusively that homosexuals account for between 25% and 40% of all child molestations. Sex researchers Freund, Heasman, Racansky, and Glancy, for example, in an 1984 Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy article, put the number at 36%. Erickson, Walbek, Sely, in an 1988 Archives of Sexual Behavior article, places it at 28%. (27)

However, it should be noted that homosexuals account for only 2% of the population which statistically means that a child molester is 10-20 times more likely to be homosexual than heterosexual. In other words, heterosexual molestations proportionally are a fraction compared to homosexual molestations. More recent studies confirm this statistic. In 2000, the Archives of Sexual Behavior published an article by seven sex researchers concluding that ‘‘around 25-40% of men attracted to children prefer boys…thus the rate of homosexual attraction is 6-20 times higher among pedophiles.’” (28)

Sexual violence expert and professor of psychiatry Eugene Abel concluded in a 1987 study published by the Journal of Interpersonal Violence, that homosexuals “Sexually molest young boys with an incidence that is occurring from five times greater than the molestation of girls.” (29)

In a 1992 study published in the Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, sex researchers K. Freud and R. I. Watson found that homosexual males are three times more likely than straight men to engage in pedophilia and that the average pedophile victimizes between 20 and 150 boys before being arrested. (30)

Other data has come to the fore confirming that sex with young boys is a way of life for many homosexuals. In 1993 The United States Army, Office of Judge Advocate, issued a study that analyzed 102 court martial convictions having to do with soldiers involved in homosexual acts over a four-year period. The study found that in 47% of the cases, homosexual men victimized a youth.

A content analysis of molestation stories by the Family Research Institute involving five major newspapers found around 40% involved homosexuals – and this number is low due to the fact that many reporters will not report if a child molester is homosexual even if he knows that to be the case.

A study by sex researchers Alan Bell and Martin Weinberg found that 25% of white gay men have had sex with boys 16 years and younger. The Family Research Institute conducted a similar study and found that “11 times more gays than exclusively heterosexual men reported sex with a man while they were under the age of 13.” A study by homosexual activists and researchers Jay and Young revealed that 73% of homosexuals surveyed had sex with boys 16 to 19 years of age or younger. (31)

In a study on male rape published by the American Journal of Psychiatry, it was found that 6% of rape victims reported to a Philadelphia rape crisis center were boys under 16 years old. And women are not raping them.

This type of behavior, however, is considered normal in psychiatric circles due to the influence of homosexual psychiatrists within the American Psychiatric Association. It is the homosexual caucus within that body that pushed to rewrite the diagnostic criteria for pedophilia. The new definition defines sex with children as a psychological disorder only if it causes “clinically significant distress” for the molester! Under that definition, most molesters are perfectly normal people!

The American Psychological Association appears to have similar sympathies when they published a sloppy and error filled article in their Psychological Bulletin in July, 1998, that argued there isn’t any research documented that child abuse is harmful to children and that “A willing encounter with positive reactions would be labeled simply adult-child sex” instead of using terms such as child abuse and victim. There was no outcry from the homosexual community. Indeed, they either remained silent or publicly defended the article. One of the nation’s most prominent homosexual journalists, Andrew Sullivan, attacked critics of the study in the New York Times. In the National Journal, gay journalist Jonathan Rauch strongly defended the study and argued that child molestation should be called “adult-adolescent sex.”

It is not a coincidence that an epidemic in male child molestation is occurring simultaneously with the rise of an aggressive homosexual subculture. Due to the AIDS virus, molestation is often a death sentence. In a study by the American Medical Association, 50% of male AIDS victims reported having sex with an adult male by the age of 16 and 20% of male AIDS victims had sex with an adult male by age 10! The Center for Disease Control reports that by 1991, 7,166 boys were dying of AIDS and 84% of them were infected by adult men. That statistic is much higher today yet there is no outcry from the health profession, no protests from the children’s rights groups and silence from our educators.

Indeed, the response instead has been an escalating effort by the homosexual community to compromise every major youth group possible, not to mention the inundation of our public schools with pro-homosexual curriculum, counseling, and social activities. The YMCA, Girl Scouts, and the Big Brothers, despite also being plagued by molestation incidents, have all capitulated to homosexual pressure campaigns. Indeed, Girl Scout leaders writing in the 1997 book, On My Honor: Lesbians Reflect on their Scouting Experience, reveal that the Girl Scouts are inundated with lesbians – a third of its professional staff is lesbian – and they have even initiated a lesbian mentoring program! The Boy Scouts now stand alone among America’s major youth groups in resisting the homosexual agenda – and that explains why they are under such ferocious legal, legislative, and cultural attack.

Moreover, the natural bias of a mostly liberal media is to omit any mention of a person’s homosexuality when covering molestation stores. This is reinforced by pressure from homosexuals groups. The Gay & Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation (GLAAD) disseminated a “media guide” to reporters nationwide in which they urge: “A criminal’s…. sexual orientation is not always obvious (or relevant) based simply on the circumstances of a crime…as a rule avoid labeling an activity or emotion as ‘homosexual’ unless you would call the same activity ‘heterosexual’ or ‘straight’ if engaged in by someone of another sexual orientation.”

The homosexual community knows that the capture of all major youth groups is absolutely necessary to the expansion of its movement. They know what most social scientists and sex researchers know but won’t talk about: molested children are likely to become homosexual. After all, one of the most common characteristics of homosexual molesters is the fact they were molested themselves during boyhood.

It is high time that America’s elected officials, health authorities, education leaders, and law enforcement officials act to not only tell the harsh truth – the homosexual community has targeted America’s youth – but act now to counter this horrible trend. Failure to do so will have disastrous consequences for both our culture and for the health of our children.

1) See Footnotes 27-31 or visit any homosexual bookstore.

2) Frank York & Robert Knight, Family Research Council, Homosexual Activists Work to Lower

Age of Consent. Washington, D.C.

3) At least five Southern California Counties contracted GLASS to receive troubled children and as a result receive funding from Federal, State, and County governments. See the legal complaint filed against GLASS by the California Department of Social Services, Docket No. 6395284001, page 3.

4) See Glass’s website: http://home.glassLA.org/glass/services.htm

5) See Glass website: http://home.glassLA.org/glass/presidnt.htm

6) Complaint filed by California Department of Social Services, Docket No.639528400, page 4.

7) Ibid, page 8.

8) Washington Times, K.L. Billingsley, “Gay Agency Probed for Child Abuse,” 9/21/96 A2.

9) Los Angeles Times, Bettina Boxall, June 23, 1996 “Beleaguered Gay Agency Fights Back.” Part B, Page 1.

10) As a former member of the California State Assembly, the author requested all documents relating to this case from the Department of Social Services and found no evidence of any proceedings initiated by the Attorney General’s office.

11) Amici Curiae brief field by Public Advocate, Concerned Women for America, et al., before the New Jersey Supreme Court, Oct., 1999 in the BSA v. Jane Dale case; Also Los Angeles Times, Steve Geissinger, Oct 14, 1993 “Scout Files Reveal Sex Abuse Cases”

12) World Net Daily, Aug 23, 2000, “Who’s Afraid of the Boy Scouts”? Joe Farah; Also Culture Facts, Family Research Council, Aug 27, 2000, Vol 3, No. 34.

13) W.D. Erickson, N.H. Walbek, R.K. Seely, “ Behavior Patterns of Child Molesters,” Archives of Sexual Behavior, Vol 17, No. 1, 1988.

14)”Pedophile Lawsuit Goes Class Action?” Julie Foster, World Net Daily, 7/25/2000

15)From Statement of goals in an undated NAMBLA recruitment brochure.

16)NAMBLA website: http://qrd.tcp.com/qrd/orgs/NAMBLA/Nambla.and.youth

17)NAMBLA document “What People are Saying About NAMBLA and Man/Boy Love,” http://qrd.tcp.com/qrd/orgs/NAMBLA/quotes

18)Ibid. See also Lambda Report, Dec-Jan, 1993-94. “Do Gays Discriminate on the Basis of Sexual Orientation?”

19) “No Place for Homo-Homophobia,” San Francisco Sentinel, March 26, 1992.

20)Lambda Report, Sept 1993, Vol 1, No. 4, Page 3.

21) Culture Facts, Family Research Council, “Homosexual Journal Lauds Pedophile” 11/10/99, Vol. 2, No. 45; See also NAMBLA’s website at http://world.std.com for a list of studies in mostly pro-homosexual journals which NAMBLA claims prove that the molestation of children is not only not harmful to children, but in some cases, beneficial!

22) San Francisco Sentinel, op cit.

23) Judith Reisman, Ph.D. and Charles B. Johnson Ph.D. “Partner Solicitation Language as a Reflection of Male Sexual Orientation,” The Institute for Media Education, 1995, First Principles Press, Inc.

24) Encyclopedia of Homosexuality, Garland Publishing, 1990, edited by Wayne Dynes, page 964.

25) Lloyd, Robin, “For Money or Love, Boy Prostitution in America,” March, 1976, Vanguard

26) Frank York & Robert Knight, Homosexual Activists Work to Lower the Age of Sexual Consent, Family Research Council, Washington, D.C.

27) W.D. Erickson, N.H. Walbek, R.K. Seely, “Behavior Patterns of Child Molesters,” Archives of Sexual Behavior, Vol 17, No. 1, 1988

28)Blanchard R, Barbaree HE, Bogaert AF, Dicky R, Klassen P, Kuban ME, Zucker KJ., Fraternal Birth Order and Sexual Orientation in Pedophiles, Archives of Sexual Behavior 2000; 29;463-

29) Abel, Eugene, Et Al., “Self Reported Sex Crimes of Nonincarcerated Paraphiliacs,” Journel of Interpersonal Violence, Vol. 2, No 1, March 1987, AT 5-25.

30) Freund, K & R. I. Watson, “The Proportions of Heterosexual and Homosexual Pedophiles Among Sex Offenders Against Children: An Exploratory Study.” Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 18 (Spring 1992): pp. 34-43

31) K. Jay and A. Young, The Gay Report (New York: Summit Books, 1979), P. 275.

 

Print Friendly and PDF



Posting Policy

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse. Read More

  • thisoldspouse

    FreeKate.

    Enough said

    • Cheyenne W.

      Spouser, since you are clearly into pedophilia (you bring it up every chance you get), what’s your professional opinion on this topic? I’m sure that you have researched it thoroughly…

      • thisoldspouse

        Um, the topic of the article is pedophilia. And the article is well referenced with well-researched sources. I would refer you to these.

        • Cheyenne W.

          I would hardly consider Reisman, Knight, or the Lambda Report (published by none other than “Porno” Pete Labarbara to be credible sources.

          • thisoldspouse

            Well, personal bias on your part aside, the sources no doubt reference other authoritative sources.

          • Cheyenne W.

            Actually, I can’t think of anyone who would take those sources seriously, since they are clearly biased. Of course, I wouldn’t use NAMBLA as a source either. Some of actually care about objectivity.

          • Steven Schwartz

            the sources no doubt reference other authoritative sources.

            Actually, there’s quite the history of circular citation in sources such as those.

            Tell me, thisoldspouse, would you accept “These statistics come from the HRC, GLAAD, and the Lambda Legal Fund; if you don’t believe them, no doubt they reference authoritative sources”?

          • no more mr. nice guy

            You and your filth-ridden ilk are so full of self-loathing rage and hate that you are impervious to reason; lacking in functioning conscience; invulnerable to regret; historically deprived; academically anemic; and intellectually insolvent.
            Facts are always stubborn things. Only the moronic; the malevolent and the Marxist would conclude that 2+2 isn’t always and forever 4.

          • Cheyenne W.

            I think you might want to look in a mirror.

          • no more mr. nice guy

            I do. That’s how I know that who you are and what you do is what equality always isn’t’ what love never is; and what normal, natural and healthy can’t ever be.

          • Cheyenne W.

            You really are slow, aren’t ya? I pay my taxes, I work 2 jobs, and I maintain a nice home with my male partner. Both of us have graduate degrees and make good incomes. Just because I prefer the same sex doesn’t make me any less normal than you. You want to know why you’re losing this fight over SSM? It’s because answers like you’re throwing out here make your side look like a bunch of possessed loons. If were on your side, I would be trying to hide crazies like you in the attic unless or until you can calm down.

          • no more mr. nice guy

            When it comes to sex; marriage; parenting; adopting; role modeling; adopting; teaching; coaching; and unlimited unsupervised access to children, impenitent practicing homosexuals are always and forever less than and unequal to vastly more normal, natural and healthy human beings.

          • Cheyenne W.

            Really? If I were fired for being gay, the lawsuit that I would have would let me retire comfortably. Here it has been against the law to discriminate against gays since 1982. You need to get a life, and probably some psychiatric counseling as well.

          • no more mr. nice guy

            Civilization demands discrimination. Without discrimination there would be no civilization. Discrimination is not a dirty word. It is the essence of freedom. Everyone discriminates on hundreds of subjects: where to live; where to work; where to shop; where to vacation; ad-infinitum. And they discriminate against being forced to associate with those whose behaviors are universally known to be repugnant and repulsive. Discrimination against abnormal, unnatural unhealthy behaviors is mandatory for all who want to genuinely “promote and protect the general welfare”.
            All laws should discriminate in favor of normal, natural and healthy behaviors as opposed to discriminating in favor of abnormal, unnatural and unhealthy behaviors. When any civilization; culture or country discriminates in favor of the abnormal, unnatural and unhealthy, chaos and pandemonium eventually prevail because such discriminations were premeditated and orchestrated to rot from the inside out.
            You are the essence of what valid discrimination looks like. You aren’t worthy of special protections because you choose with insolence and arrogance to defy what is normal, natural and healthy.
            You are the face of what should always be the subject of
            discrimination. There are hundreds of ways to obviate unjust law suits that favor heathenism. In fact, there are ways to inflict just law suits that will disenfranchise evil from the power to create and commit evil.

          • Cheyenne W.

            You just keep telling yourself that my friend…

          • no more mr. nice guy

            I don’t need to tell myself. I’m telling you. Get used to it.

          • Cheyenne W.

            LMAO…

          • no more mr. nice guy

            GSFY

          • garybryson

            feeling oppressed sugar? Your christian love is showing with that last comment. Are you done screaming and stomping your feet?

          • Cheyenne W.

            Doubtful… But his “foot stomping” is infinitely more interesting than Ray-ray’s cut and paste.

          • no more mr. nice guy

            I am always invigorated when I see you and your fiendish homo friends prove time and time again that you are living in an animated state of high anxiety. Otherwise, why would your feeble minds try to force yourself on others? If you are so righteousness and certain of your victory, why would you waste your time prowling these articles articulating your brain addled blithering incoherence and delusion? The answer is simple. You are terrified to know that the truth [as it always does] will reveal not just your insanity but your hate for the natural, normal and healthy. Some might say that when this happens [and it will happen], you and your hateful heathen brethren would be lucky to find a closet to run to.

          • garybryson

            Internet- $25 monthly
            Diet Coke- $2.75 /six pack
            Making life miserable for bigots on boobwire- Priceless

          • no more mr. nice guy

            Tick! Tick! Tick!

      • thisoldspouse

        By the way, did you understand my reference to “FreeKate?” No shame if you don’t, but look it up.

        Point is, homosexuals champion pedophilia. THAT is why I try to expose it at every opportunity.

        • garybryson

          You are a pedo spouser. Its the only thing you seem to focus on. Shame for your kids though

        • Cheyenne W.

          I have no earthly idea who or what “Free Kate” is…

          • thisoldspouse

            As I said, look it up.

    • Cheyenne W.

      I checked that out. She should be prosecuted for statutory rape. Thanks for the heads up!

  • Jeanette Victoria

    The Sodomite whinging is going to be impressive. Truth is the new hate

    • Cheyenne W.

      Morning Jeanette, I see that you’re still off the meds…

      • thisoldspouse

        Better not be off yours, though. Not for a day.

        • Cheyenne W.

          I took my atripla last night and my blood pressure meds this morning. Glad that you’re concerned though. Oh, and actually you could miss the atripla for a day or two, but not longer ( I have only missed a dose once in my life).

          • thisoldspouse

            I always heard that the schedule was pretty tight for HIV meds. Don’t know what “tight” is, but good to know there is some wiggle room.

          • Cheyenne W.

            You theoretically could be off for a week, but for sure no longer, unless you were switching meds. It’s just my habit to set the pill next to my chair every night, next to my beta blocker and to take both at 11. I think that the older regimens with myriads of pills were more important to take exactly at a certain time each and every day. Sort of like Jeanette’s anti-psychotic medication.

          • no more mr. nice guy

            Why don’t you simply stop the behavior that causes you to take medication that is often as perilous as the disease itself?

          • Steven Schwartz

            Are you really so stupid as to be asking that question honestly?

            No, of course not.

            Here’s 5 cents, troll. Go buy yourself a bridge.

          • no more mr. nice guy

            Wow! This is yet another self-incriminating and cowardly failure to answer a question.

          • Steven Schwartz

            Then, to give you my answer, which is not the original poster’s:

            Because a condition already exists, and the behavior doesn’t “cause” someone to continue to take the medication.

            It’s not like we’re talking about someone who keeps getting burned by sticking their hands on a stove, you nitwit.

          • no more mr. nice guy

            It’s worse than “someone who keeps getting burned by sticking their hands on a stove”.

          • Steven Schwartz

            And why is that, according to your peculiar view upon the world? Since we are talking, IIRC, about something that can be traced to a single act, rather than somethign that recurs each time the practice occurs?

          • no more mr. nice guy

            What?

          • Steven Schwartz

            I believe Cheyenne was talking about HIV medication. Which is not a recurring infection — but a one-time thing. So “Why don’t you simply stop the behavior that causes you to take medication” is an inane question; once the infection has happened, stopping the behavior doesn’t do anything.

            Now do you get it? Or are you willfully ignorant?

          • Cheyenne W.

            But the truth is, so long as I stay on meds and my viral load remains undetectable, I am not a threat to anyone. The ones spreading it are the people that have no idea they are infected and are not on meds at all.

          • no more mr. nice guy

            You knowledge deprivation in a desperate attempt to validate you wrongs are pathetic. The meds aren’t magic. They are not a cure for what self-love and self-control would naturally make moot. The so called meds do extend life. But they are often so toxic that the side effects do not automatically provide for extended quality of life. Moreover, diseases requiring meds can build up resistance to the medicines. And most importantly their is no cure for HIV/AIDS
            Why aren’t you aware of “recombinant HIV/AIDS” which is caused by increased promiscuity thus obviating the purpose of the meds. Some of the recombinant strains have been the result of “superinfection” which occurs when an HIV-positive person is re-infected with another strain of HIV and can increase the likelihood of drug resistance to antiretroviral [ARP] therapy and if a resistant strain is transmitted could speed up disease progression.
            It’s like an alcoholic who takes potent drugs to slow down liver disease while increasing the intake of alcohol which caused the disease the medicine is trying to stem.

          • thisoldspouse

            I think it’s too late for Cheyenne. The question you should ask is why doesn’t he stop putting other people at risk?

          • no more mr. nice guy

            Anyone who hates themselves will always hate others.
            It’s called blame shifting; finger pointing; scapegoat making.
            Every impenitent practicing homo is an obvious impediment to the “general welfare” which is the aim of the long standing goal: “Present homosexuality degeneracy and promiscuity as normal, natural and healthy”.

          • Cheyenne W.

            First off, I don’t sleep around, and my partner is HIV positive. Secondly, by staying on the meds, it keeps my viral load at undetectable levels, which is important since at my school I am a first responder. Would you rather have someone who is HIV positive, but not on meds dealing with you after a tornado (and the possibility of blood contact) or someone who takes their meds and stays at an undetectable (and healthy) level? BTW, undetectable means that there are less than 20 copies of HIV in 1 cc of blood.

          • Jeanette Victoria

            HIV is a totally preventable disease. I’m sorry you have it.

          • Cheyenne W.

            Thank you, but I’ve had it since I was 19, so almost half of my life. It is preventable if people are honest.

          • thisoldspouse

            It is preventable if people are sane and abstinent.

      • http://BarbWire.com/ Brian Fitzpatrick

        You’re better than this, Cheyenne.

    • 19gundog43

      It’s hilarious watching the sodomites tie themselves in knots denying
      articles that don’t glorify their perversions. Anything negative is met with
      LIAR LIAR PANTS ON FIRE! It’s hard to decide if they are just crushingly boring or
      funny. I’m leaning toward really BORING! They’re out of arguments.

      • Walt NYC

        Awwww…poor you. If you are opposed to being called a liar, it might help to quit lying so much.

        • http://victimsofgaybullying.wordpress.com/ JBenning

          It would help even more if people like you would stop with the “born this way” mantra. Its getting really old.

          • John R

            I guess you just can’t handle the truth. Why is that?
            Why is it so hard for you people to understand and accept the truth that yes, some of us are born straight and some of us are born gay? There is no way around that.

          • no more mr. nice guy

            Perversions aren’t genetic! What gives the hydra-headed homosexual heathens such a special claim as opposed to all other hateful dehumanizing behaviors?

          • Steven Schwartz

            Perversions aren’t genetic!

            Same-sex attraction might be genetic.

            By your logic, then, same-sex attraction might not be a perversion.

            Thank you — that’s a significant shift from your normal drivel.

          • no more mr. nice guy

            No moron! Being attracted is not the same as and equal to being addicted. Being attracted may not be a choice. Being addicted is always a choice!

          • John R

            Exactly how is homosexuality a dehumanizing behavior?
            Your problem is that you think it’s a perversion when in fact it’s not.

          • Walt NYC

            I have rarely ever used the “born this way mantra,” and I find the song incredibly annoying. However, if you really want people to stop using it, present some factual scientific evidence to prove otherwise. All you’ve really done so far is a lot of name-calling, and that only really proves your lack of any point.

          • John R

            You just can’t handle the truth. Why is that? Why is it so hard to accept the fact that a persons sexual orientation is not a choice? Every gay person that has ever lived, millions upon millions of us, and every single one of us have said the exact same thing and that is we did not choose to be gay. Why can’t you take our word for it?

          • Matthew T. Mason

            Because only a complete moron would do that.

            If you are going to back up your assertions, you need to be able to defend it; back it up with evidence. That problem here is the evidence does not exist.

            Which perfectly explains why you want us to merely “take your word for it.”

            Pound salt.

          • John R

            The evidence also does not exist that we are not born gay.
            Since every gay person has always said the same thing then yes, you do need to take our word for it seeing that we are the ones that would know if we made a choice to be gay. If it were a choice that would mean you could make the choice to be gay. Can you do that? Why not?

          • Matthew T. Mason

            You just went full retard, John.

            Never go full retard.

          • garybryson

            kinda like you do in every comment?

          • Terry Lee

            It’s funny, during the 60’s and the 70’s, if you tried to make allowances for gays by saying they were born that way, you would have been shouted down. Back then the gays claimed they were’nt born that way – they claimed it was a lifestyle a choice. A lifestyle choice. They adamantly denied being born that way – they chose to be gay, and that was their right.

            Then when the AIDs virus hit in the 80’s, and various groups started looking closer at the gay community, all of a sudden being gay was’nt a lifestyle choice any longer. They now claimed to be ‘born that way’ so as to distance themselves from it’s spreading.

            It’s a lifestyle choice one moment……and a ‘gay gene’ the next. So which one is it?

        • 19gundog43

          LOL! Actually Curly I consider it an honor to be called a liar by the fudge packing sissies. Pass that along to Moe and Larry.

          • Walt NYC

            LOL! You never have any facts to add to any conversation. All you have is name-calling, which means you really have nothing, and you know it. That’s really all I need to know.

          • 19gundog43

            Facts? You clowns don’t care about facts. The articles you ridicule are full of facts and all you do is call the authors liars and try to destroy their reputations. You people are jokes, not deserving of respect.

          • Walt NYC

            Awwww…once again, poor, poor you. We dispute the articles with actual facts. That’s not ridicule, silly. It’s called telling the truth. You, personally, have no facts or anything substantial to add to the conversation, just more name-calling. What a petulant little boy/girl you are.

          • John R

            Can you show us one fact in this article? Just one true fact?

          • Walt NYC

            By the way, “compression skills?” LOL!

        • aCultureWarrior

          Articles like this Queen Walt must make you, “gay”bryson, lil Stevie Schwartz and Cheyenne W (who gets paid to be around little boys all day) feel very uncomfortable. In all fairness, not all of you are into hanging around McDonalds Playlands and Chuck E Cheese birthday parties checking out 8 year old boys. Some of you prefer going to the arcades to recruit 12 and 13 year olds. I believe there is a word for that:
          Pederast.

          • Walt NYC

            Actually, your shameless fixation on underage boys makes me feel very uncomfortable. You seem to know all the “hot spots” for cruising them. I guess I shouldn’t be surprised. Anyone as profoundly closeted as you must project his obsession onto others in the hopes that we will be distracted. It’s too late, aCultureWarriorPrincess. “Gay” Bryson, L’il Stevie Schwartz, Cheyenne W and I, Queen Walt, are onto you. Hopefully, the local law enforcement authorities are, as well.

          • Matthew T. Mason

            Nice troll.

            If wanting to protect children from sexual predators offends you that much, one has to ask why.

            See, your dumb, strawman tactic of trying to get people to defend themselves on this subject when in fact it has nothing to do with them whatsoever is a big, bold red flag.

            If there isn’t something going on, why scream, holler, moan and cry about it? The very fact you are launching personal attacks on those who do not believe children are toys or sperm receptacles instead of attacking those who actually look at and treat children in that manner says there is something wrong with you, not us.

            You have done absolutely nothing other than prove every single person who has spoken out on this issue right.

            Now, of course, you will deny, deny, deny and attack from now ’til doomsday. But as Only My Humble Opinion has demonstrated, sooner or later the truth is going to come out. And, unfortunately, the internet is forever.

          • Walt NYC

            You really should do a little research, or just mind your own business. I most often attempt to present my argument in a very benign manner, using as many facts as I can find. aCultureWarrior has been nothing but disrespectful and contentious from the beginning, never presenting any factual evidence of anything. Just condescension and name-calling. He/she has absolutely no interest in the welfare of children. He/she simply wants to be a bully.
            By the way, if you are going to accuse someone of “trying to get people to defend themselves on this subject when in fact it has nothing to do with them,” don’t turn around and do the same. You claim there is something wrong with me, not you. Stop deflecting. It makes you look like a colossal hypocrite.

          • Matthew T. Mason

            Who is deflecting? This is about you, and it has always been about you.

            And once again, you refuse to address the true subject at hand. Once again, you make yourself look like a defender for homosexual pedophilia.

            And, no, it is too late to do it now. You should have done it to begin with instead of wasting bandwidth attacking other people on this forum.

            It’s over, Walt. You’re done. You are just another homosexual who thinks it is cool to boff little kids, and you got caught.

          • garybryson

            Sorry babe but you and spouser are the ONLY ones here obsessed with such things.Are your kids safe? your wife? You need professional help matty my boy, serious professional help.

          • Cheyenne W.

            Spouser looks positively sane compared to him.

          • Walt NYC

            Nothing is over. Again, go back and read any of aCultureWarrior’s attacks on me and my character and get a clue. He never presents any facts, never adds anything to any conversation – it’s all name-calling and innuendo. Hey, come to think of it, you are doing pretty much the same thing.
            I have never had, nor will I have ever have relations with anyone who is underage. It doesn’t interest me in the least. I prefer adult men. Always have, always will. Not that I owe you any type of explanation, but I do not appreciate the implication that I think it’s “cool to boff little kids.” Nothing could be further from the truth. That’s probably why I react the way I do when the accusations start flying on here. In fact, it’s always your side that brings up such things. That’s a little telling. You might want to practice what you preach and quit “wasting bandwidth attacking other people on this forum.” More hypocrisy from you.

          • Matthew T. Mason

            Well, lookee here at poor wittle Walt, flailing about in total CYA mode.

            You had your turn, your opportunity. I am not impressed by your continued attempt to make this about me, nor do I believe a single word you say.

          • garybryson

            Poor matty is being repressed again..LOL! Stop your trolling for other child predators like yourself! The pedo schtick is getting old sugar

          • aCultureWarrior

            Come on Queen Walt, I know your type all too well. You come to Christian websites hoping to befriend a naive Christian couple and when they’re strapped for a babysitter for their 8 year old son some night…
            Queen Walt to the rescue!

          • Walt NYC

            More helpful hints from barbwire’s favorite (not so closeted) pedo! if you really want to reach your target audience, you should write an advice column for NAMBLA.

          • Matthew T. Mason

            This is not about aCultureWarrior
            either. It’s all about you, and your comment does nothing for you at all.

          • Cheyenne W.

            Um, I have not now, nor ever had relations with anyone who is underage. FYI, I prefer guys that are older than me. Also, have you ever heard of something called a “background check” ? I doubt that anyone who had done something indecent would pass that for their teaching license. I would appreciate you not insinuating that I would ever take indecent liberties with a minor.

          • Matthew T. Mason

            And I absolutely do not believe a single word you say.

            Shut the flip up.

          • garybryson

            nobody but nobody cares what you think matty

          • aCultureWarrior

            Forgive me, you’re obviously one of those clean and wholesome proud and unrepentant sodomites

          • Cheyenne W.

            I may be an unrepentant “sodomite” but I am certainly not a sick pedophile. And, after I get my shower in a minute, I’ll be clean too. It’s amazing what a little soap and water can do, don’t ya think?

          • aCultureWarrior

            I’ll give you the benefit of the doubt on this one Cheyenne and acknowledge that diddling 8 year old boys is not your “thing”. However, you might recall from past conversations that we’ve had that you have no problem indoctrinating the minds of these innocent youth. While you might not physically molest a child, you molest their minds and that is just as bad.

          • Cheyenne W.

            My students at school have no idea that I’m even gay. I teach a very conservative version of history, one that even you would probably approve ( I have adapted my teaching materials largely from my college teaching materials). For example, I label the entire post civil rights era (an entire 4.5 week unit) “Post-modern America” and the focus of the unit is to compare and contrast the divisiveness and the growth of identity based politics since the 1970s with the unity of the WWII and immediate era. I would hardly call that “indoctrination.” As for gay rights, I simply cover Stonewall and the AIDS crisis, that’s all. I never cover material that is less than 20 years old. I know that you’re referring to what I would say if a student told me that he or she were gay, and I know that you didn’t like the answer, but that is all hypothetical since it has never happened. I strive to teach my students good writing and critical thinking skills, but sadly many of my colleagues do not. My sexuality is not a concern in the classroom, although many of my colleagues do know that I’m gay since I bring my partner to faculty events, such as the Christmas party.

          • aCultureWarrior

            The bottom line is that you’re a pevert Cheyenne, and to make things worse you’re proud of it. Children should NEVER be allowed to be around perverts, as there is one thing predictable about perverts: they’ll always molest either the mind or bodies of innocent chldren. Seek help Cheyenne, before it’s too late.

          • Cheyenne W.

            Lol… I am a pervert… You’re the one running around here talking about pedophilia. I do get a kick out of ya’ll some days.

    • http://victimsofgaybullying.wordpress.com/ JBenning

      Nothing really surprises me with Al-‘Gay’da and Lezbollah. They pretty well do what they do best….piss, moan, and groan over having the truth be told about them. Poor poor babies.

  • Cheyenne W.

    I do love these fairy tales. If it weren’t for the evils of “sodomy” boobwire wouldn’t have the ability to exist…

  • garybryson

    Keep trying steve..maybe someone with a brain will believe you some day.

    • 19gundog43

      And another solid rebuttal. Really deep Cupcake. LMFAO.

      • garybryson

        same thing you said last night….LMFAO!

  • portertx

    The Prevalence of Clergy Sexual Misconduct with Adults:

    national, random survey conducted in 2008 with 3,559 respondents

    The Prevalence of Clergy Sexual Misconduct

    We used the 2008 General Social Survey (GSS) to estimate the prevalence of clergy sexual misconduct. This is an in-person survey of a nationally representative sample of noninstitutionalized English- or Spanish-speaking adults, conducted by National Opinion Research Center at the University of Chicago. The 2008 survey included 3559 respondents. Although the GSS is an in-person interview, the questions we developed specifically for this project were self-administered, making it easier for respondents to report potentially painful or embarrassing experiences.

    Clergy sexual misconduct was defined in this study as:

    Minister, priests, rabbis, or other clergypersons or religious leaders who make sexual advances or propositions to persons in the congregations they serve who are not their spouses or significant others.

    Of those surveyed:

    More than 3% of women who had attended a congregation in the past month reported that they had been the object of CSM at some time in their adult lives;

    92% of these sexual advances had been made in secret, not in open dating relationships; and

    67% of the offenders were married to someone else at the time of the advance.

    In the average American congregation of 400 persons, with women representing, on average, 60% of the congregation, there are, on average of 7 women who have experienced clergy sexual misconduct.

    Of the entire sample, 8% report having known about CSM occurring in a congregation they have attended. Therefore, in the average American congregation of 400 congregants, there are, on average, 32 persons who have experienced CSM in their community of faith.

  • Walt NYC

    This article is a mish-mash of all the religious right has to offer: fear-mongering, conjecture, false accusations, and faux statistics.

    Dr. Judith Reisman, PhD. (in Communications) is a visiting professor at Jerry Falwell’s Liberty University and a staunch proponent of the “gays are pedophiles” myth. Reisman claims male homosexuals aren’t at all interested in adult men and only want “obtain sex with as many boys as possible.” She also believes the gay rights movement in Germany led to the rise of the Nazi Party.

    Harry Hay and Don Kilhefner were members of the “Radical Faeries,” a fringe group that was vehemently opposed to what they saw as the assimilation attitude of the mainstream U.S. gay community. They were anti-establishment and rejected “hetero-imitation.”

    It seems that GLASS and NAMBLA are no longer in existence. NAMBLA has never been a part of the gay community. In the 20 years that I have lived in NYC, I have attended every Gay Pride Parade. I have never once seen NAMBLA march in the parade. I have never seen them represented at any of the gay events I have attended. I have never so much as met anyone who claimed to be a member of NAMBLA. It’s hard for me to imagine that if NAMBLA was such a driving force, in a city as populated as NYC, a gay man would have never encountered even one person affiliated with the organization.

    If anyone on here is interested in facts, try researching the work of Dr. A. Nicholas Groth. Dr. Groth is a trained psychologist and pioneer in the scientific study of sexual offenders against women and children. Over the course of two decades, he treated more than 3,000 child molesters. Groth is also the author of “Men Who Rape: Psychology of the Offender,” a work widely regarded as a textbook on the psychology of sexual violence.

    Dr. Groth, has this to say about the connection between homosexuality and pedophilia: “The research to date all points to there being no significant relationship between a homosexual lifestyle and child molestation. There appears to be practically no reportage of sexual molestation of girls by lesbian adults and the adult male who sexually molests young boys is not likely to be homosexual.”

    Dr. Groth has also drawn the conclusion that male pedophiles do tend to victimize boys more often than girls, but for reasons that really have nothing to do with homosexuality. Groth opines that pedophiles are drawn to children sexually in that they identify with the child and appear to want to remain children themselves. This would explain Jerry Sandusky’s description of his alleged locker room shower incident as “horsing around.”

    Groth further stresses: “These same individuals are uninterested in adult homosexual relationships. In fact, they frequently express a strong sexual aversion to adult males, reporting that what they find attractive about the immature boy are his feminine features and the absence of secondary sexual characteristics such as body hair and muscles.”

    People like Steve Baldwin lament the fact that the homosexual community continues to gain further societal acceptance. The lies and fear-mongering will continue but you cannot stop progress. As it has become increasingly less stressful for homosexuals to “come out of the closet” more and more people realize that they know, love, and are related to a gay person, and we are not the diabolical monsters the religious extremists have portrayed us to be for such a long time.

    • Rockon

      Small case studies from psychologists like Nicolas Groth have
      only specialized in dealing with heterosexual pedophiles. You can’t make
      a conclusion that heterosexuals are as much of or more of a threat than
      homosexuals when it comes to pedophilia based on small sample size that
      only by design have included heterosexual pedophiles…of course the result(s) will be
      skewed toward that conclusion.

      • Rockon

        Also, this article doesn’t argue that homosexuality and pedophilia are the same behaviors or that all persons caught up in homosexuality are also pedophiles. It simply points out that as a political movement, the homosexual ACTIVIST movement are the only ones who advocate for pederasty and lowing the age of consent. None of these pedophile activist groups mentioned in the article are ones that consist of adults attracted to the opposite sex. There are no heterosexual pedophile activist groups, but there does exist homosexual pedophile activist groups.

        • Walt NYC

          Simply not true. Name a homosexual pedophile activist group, other than NAMBLA. And, what homosexual activists are are advocating for pederasty and lowering the age of consent?

          • RCQ_92130

            Only one/

            OK – here is the largest and best funded of the homosexual pedophile groups: the gay community.

          • Walt NYC

            Well, thanks for proving my point. You have nothing.

        • portertx

          “There are no heterosexual pedophile activist groups’ – Oh there are heterosexual pedophile groups:

          The Rene Guyon Society

          Childhood Sensuality Circle – CSC

          Pedophiliacs Anonymous – PAN

          Pedophile Information Exchange – PIE

          Pedophile Action for Liberation – PAL

          Pedophile Alliance League – P.A.L.

          The Lewis Carroll Collectors Guild

          Howard Nichols Society

          Just to name a few — some may be defunct but they do exist.

      • Walt NYC

        Small case studies? I beg to differ. Dr. Kurt Freund and Dr. W.L Marshall have reached the same conclusions as Dr. Groth.
        And, even if what you are supposing were true, couldn’t the same be said of the “studies” cited in this article? And, why should we accept the assertions of the FRC and Dr. Judith Reisman over psychologists with no anti-gay (or anti-straight) agenda?

    • aliswell

      You put an awful lot of stock in one man’s opinion, which is based on an extremely tiny group of men and not even remotely representative of the entire picture.

      Furthermore, there’s little to no info on Groth’s personal lifestyle. Married? Single? Gay (closet or otherwise)?

      • Walt NYC

        One man who has done a mountain of research. And, as I have mentioned below, others have reached the same conclusions. And, why should Groth’s personal lifestyle matter? Do you also scrutinize the lifestyles of biased anti-gay individuals affiliated with FRC, or Dr. Judith Reisman?

        • aliswell

          Why would I research the lifestyles of anti-gay individuals? Being “anti-gay” is right, normal and natural.

          Painting predator gays as poor little victims who need to be understood is outlandish and smacks of an agenda. Thus further scrutiny is warranted.

          • Walt NYC

            Likewise, everything you have just said “smacks of an agenda.”
            No actual predator, gay or straight, is painted as a poor little victim.
            When the truth doesn’t support your incessant need to hate someone, you guys just make up a bunch of stuff.

          • http://victimsofgaybullying.wordpress.com/ JBenning

            Queers have this thing called “hate speech”. They hate speech when that speech is truth. Truth hurts.

          • Walt NYC

            So far I haven’t heard any truth, particularly not from you. I’ll let you know when it happens, though.

          • Steven Schwartz

            Why would I research the lifestyles of anti-gay individuals? Being “anti-gay” is right, normal and natural.

            And there we have it; confirmation bias in nearly its purest form.

            “Why should I do research? I know my conclusion is true.”

          • aliswell

            Hello again, Steve.

            Of course I’m bias! Who are you, a mere created thing, to tell anyone that He Who created you is wrong? God’s Word trumps man’s word every time. I’m not here to “tolerate” Sodomite filth, I’m here to point out ceaselessly it’s aberrant and WON’T be tolerated.

          • Steven Schwartz

            And who are you, “a mere created thing” to claim to know the word of God?

            If you demand to know the background of someone speaking against something you believe in, but presume that anyone on your side is clean because they’re on your side, you have lost any claim to objectivity or honest investigation. That’s not “tolerance”, that’s “attempting to conform with reality”.

            I don’t care what, say, David Barton does in his spare time — his historical work is shoddy and manipulative enough that it doesn’t matter. Similarly, if someone revealed that James Clerk Maxwell had tortured kittens it would not affect the validity of Maxwell’s equations.

          • aliswell

            Your vain and foolish questions regarding the Word are a waste of time and a bore.

            David Barton, BTW, is remarkably meticulous in his research. The fact that your ideologies are polar to his establishes the fact that your own prejudices blind you to truth.

          • Steven Schwartz

            David Barton, BTW, is remarkably meticulous in his research.

            That would explain why his conservative Christian publisher pulled his last book for its massive historical inaccuracies, now wouldn’t it.

            I refer you to Chris Rodda’s work on Barton — if you are trying to be an honest, intellectually engaged citizen, you’ll give it a look.

            The only people Barton has credibility with are those who feel he backs them up — precisely the problem we started with in this discussion: you believe the people who agree with you, without question, and see no reason why you would even *consider* questioning them.

            Congratulations on your closed mind. Pity about it, as well.

          • aliswell

            Chris Rodda is a virulently hate-filled anti-Christ. Her obsession with Mr. Barton, her hoplophobia, and her radical anti-Americanism don’t make her a reliable source for truth. Rather, she’s earned quite a reputation for herself with her own intellectual dishonesty when addressing anything Barton writes.

            No surprise you would enjoy her “work.” Pity, but no surprise.

          • Steven Schwartz

            I’m curious — have you *read* her work? Or are you repeating what you have heard elsewhere?

            She is not the one who had her work withdrawn by a major publisher due to their being unwilling to stand behind it.

            I’ve read both of them — and find Rodda’s responses far more detailed and accurate than Barton’s citations, when dealing with the same text.

          • Cheyenne W.

            I have nearly finished my PhD in history, and I can tell you that if you brought any work by Barton into any graduate course or cited him on any paper you would be laughed out of the room and probably asked to leave the graduate program.

          • aliswell

            That, my dear, has less to do with his credibility as it does with the virulent anti-Americanism that stains the halls of today’s campuses.

          • Cheyenne W.

            I just got done defending imperialism on another thread here, so I doubt that I would qualify as a left wing anti-American nut job. I spent 5 years in grad school defending American prerogatives against these crazies, but even I would know better than to use Barton. Maybe Nevins or De Santis would be a better choice as both qualify as mainstream, consensus historians who have wide credibility.

          • garybryson

            you don’t have a choice sugar bear.

  • junkmailbin

    a perv is a perv even if you try and hide them in pink

  • Phil Heinricke

    There is a seriously sick fixation with homos on this website

    • Walt NYC

      And sex with young boys. Don’t forget that. They are obsessed with that.

      • http://victimsofgaybullying.wordpress.com/ JBenning

        Yet, queers have to get into the schools, Boy Scouts, Girl Scouts, TV, comics, you name it and all for one thing…its all aimed at kids.

    • thisoldspouse

      We would love to never have to think about, talk about, or address this subject EVER again, as it used to be several decades ago. But when it is shoved in our faces, we shove back.

      • Phil Heinricke

        Shove back. So much for turning the other cheek. That went out along with loving your neighbor.

      • Steven Schwartz

        But when it is shoved in our faces, we shove back.

        As I have said before — it is no more being “shoved in your faces” than heterosexual behavior is. I’ve been accused of “shoving it in someone’s face” by holding hands in public.

    • RCQ_92130

      Oh, Phil, the days of us pretending gays are harmless (except to themselves) and turning our eyes from gay behavior are …. GONZO! You may label that as a ‘fixation’ or anything else you wish (labeling being the hallmark of a bigot), but we will not, EVER, turn our eyes away from your behavior again. Lesson learned!

      • Phil Heinricke

        “we will not, EVER, turn our eyes away from your behavior again”

        This is what I was talking about. That’s pretty sick.

        • RCQ_92130

          English 101: “your” may be used to indicate the possessive – meaning ‘your’ individual activity, or it may be used to indicate a generalization regarding a group (“Irag: your beheadings are horrid”). 99.99% of those will know the meaning of “your” here, though you apparently could not figure it out.

          • Phil Heinricke

            I was quoting thisoldspouse

  • ErickMN

    As usual, it’s nutjobs like Baldwin that are fixated on sex with children. This article was garbage in 2002, and it’s garbage now. A complete waste of perfectly good words and punctuation.

    • Phil Heinricke

      This article isn’t garbage, my friend. It’s a weapon. That’s right. They use this to insult gay people and fuel the burning fire of their hatred.

      • RCQ_92130

        “insult gay people” ???

        Calling dirt ‘dirty’ is not insulting dirt; it’s observing the reality of the universe. Gay people – not all, but far too many – render themselves despicable. Why, then, have a little-girl hissy fit when someone says you are despicable? The solution to that “insult” is simple – do not be despicable.

        I really DO hope this helps.

        • Phil Heinricke

          I’m not despicable so it really doesn’t affect me. The sad thing is that people think that those that spew such fierce hatred are representatives of Jesus Christ. As it is written, The gentiles blaspheme God because of you.”

          • RCQ_92130

            BEHAVIOR is despicable, not people. I don’t know your behavior and thus will not comment on your individual behavior. However, your calling this article a ‘weapon’ certainly causes one to wonder.

        • Rob T

          Based on what you’ve written, you’re giving advice you can’t seem to follow.

          • RCQ_92130

            I agree. We should ALL pretend dirty is clean.

          • Rob T

            Nope. I think we should call despicable things despicable. That’s why I’m not afraid to apply that term to what you write.

            (edited for clarity)

          • RCQ_92130

            Understandable.

            I’m sure – in a similar way – that is why some think red is green and vice versa. Of course, many of THOSE can be taught to understand their notion of up/down is a bit off kilter.

            Despite the evidence, I’ll hold out for hope you can also learn.

            (not edited since it is already quite clear)

  • Kyle

    Hey Steve, you know those studies you cite to supposedly “prove” that homosexual men were more likely to have sexual contact with underage boys? What do those studies say about the age of those homosexual men at the time of that sexual contact, how many of them were underage too?

    It is common dishonest tactic of the “gays are pedophiles” crowd to use studies into past personal sexual history to “prove” their nonsense conclusions while deliberately ignoring the fact that most respondents were also underage when having sexual contact with other underage individuals.

    • RCQ_92130

      Silly wabbit.

      The NIH published a report last year in which it was disclosed 47% of all adult gay males had sex with a gay pedophile when they were children.

      Half.

      Yet you circle the wagons and screech, “THERE ARE NO GAY PEDOPHILES!” ….. defending the ‘reputation” of the gay community; the children be damned. THAT, Kyle, is EXACTLY the posture taken by the Catholic Church toward the gay pedophiles who invaded the Priesthood. Pretty much EVERYBODY condemns the CC for doing so, yet you do the same to defend the gay community.

      Horror of horrors – you are an evil seed! Who would have guessed?

      • Kyle

        I just did a quick search of the NIH for any such study so that I could read the abstract for myself and I could not find it, perhaps you could provide a linked citation for it? Thank you.

        • RCQ_92130

          Google “NIH gay molestation”. It’s always better to learn to fish than to be given a fish.

          • Kyle

            So let me get this straight, it’s my job to do your research for you? Again, no such report exists from “last year” and the closest thing that I can find this the above mentioned severely methodologically flawed survey from 2001.

            Tell me this, because I am honestly curious, why do supposed Christians need to lie so often and so blatantly in order to justify their ridiculous claims about and irrational bigotry towards homosexuals and homosexuality?

          • RCQ_92130

            You: “… Christians need to lie so often and so blatantly …” (said as if a fact)

            I’m guessing here, but my guess is you do not even realize just how bigoted and vile you are. Correct?

          • Kyle

            You know what they say, the truth is hatred to those who hate the truth…

            My point is proven over and over again on websites such as this as well as on many other right wing, anti-homosexual, supposedly “Christian” websites. From citing sources that don’t exist, to completely misrepresenting the findings of reputable research, to authoring dishonest studies to prove a priori conclusions, heck your own comments and lies here are just another example of this undeniable trend. You’d think if you were right, you wouldn’t have to lie to prove it.

            I’ll rephrase, why do you need to lie to prove your point?

      • Kyle

        Were you perhaps referring to the 2001 survey published by M. E. Tomeo, D. L. Templer, S. Anderson & D. Kotler which has been shown to be several methodologically flawed?

        This survey found that 46% of male homosexuals reported “childhood molestation” but the researchers defined “childhood molestation” as any sexual contact (consensual or not) occurring prior to the age of 16 DESPITE the age of both parties involved.

        • RCQ_92130

          It’s so predictable: any research that is not favorable toward homosexuality is denounced by the gay community as “flawed”, while any blatant propaganda piece spewed out by Dr. Herek or by the APA’s Div. 44 is immediately hailed as if fact. “The Gay Gene” silliness started this way (as have so many of the other uncountable lies from gay activism).

          The VERY SAME methodology found only 7% of normal adult males had been preyed upon. Perhaps you believe the authors used one methodology when reporting pedophilia committed by adult gay men versus that committed by normal adult men. That would not exactly be a surprise.

          • Kyle

            Except it wasn’t “the VERY SAME methodology” Their heterosexual sample came from Christian college students, while their homosexual sample was recruited at homosexual night clubs during gay pride, have you actually even read the study or are you just relying on some biased website somewhere to tell you what it says?

  • concern00

    Homosexuals have infiltrated almost every institution related to children with well documented dire consequences. Our churches, our schools, Hollywood, sports, the BSA. Where there are children, you will find the homosexual pederasts.

    • Zohydro

      “Homosexual pederasts”… Allah, but you repeat yourself!

      • concern00

        Some things are simply worth repeating!

  • aCultureWarrior

    More articles like that Steve Baldwin and the buggerites will hate you almost as much as they hate Peter LaBarbera and Paul Cameron. Great article!

  • ConservativeSurge

    Ugh, has anyone else noticed that this article claims child rape is the favorite past time of sodomites, and yet none of the sodomites who hang out here have denied it?

    • Cheyenne W.

      I am a proud “sodomite” and have hundreds of friends and acquaintances that are “sodomites” and I don’t know of 1, myself included, that supports or participates in pedophilic activities. I have suggested on other threads that we should prosecute such activity to the fullest extent of the law. Most pedophiles don’t identify as “sodomites,” but rather as heterosexuals.

EmailTitle2

Sign up for BarbWire alerts!