Fox-News

Why are Media Conservatives Buying the Homosexual Propaganda?

avatar
Print Friendly and PDF

Over the last few years we have witnessed a headlong rush by many conservatives in the media in support of various aspects of the homosexual agenda. Some were socially liberal all along and some appear to be pushed into such a position due to pressure upon them by their colleagues or the media corporations they work for. Regardless, it is disturbing to witness their willingness to go along with this trend without even questioning the cultural impact such issues will have. Frankly, it is embarrassing how ignorant many of “our” conservative media stars are when it comes to the homosexual agenda.

Indeed, even Fox News has ignored huge stories that reflect negatively on the homosexual movement and the few times they do cover such stories, it is oftentimes inaccurate or incomplete. I wince as I watch Bill O’Reilly, Tucker Carlson, Dana Perino, Bernie Goldberg, Mary Catherine Hamm, Megyn Kelly, Shepard Smith, Margaret Hoover and others use the same arguments used by the homosexual community even to the point of using the exact same phrases and buzz words. They should know better.

For example, many media conservatives happily use the term “gay” or “gay rights” and the phrase that he or she “has come out of the closet.” However, such wording assumes people are born homosexual, a myth that not even the pro-homosexual American Psychiatrist Association will support anymore. After years of research, dozens of pro-homosexual scientists have failed to find the homosexual gene and the few that did claim to find it were later discredited for engaging in fraudulent or sloppy methodology. Moreover, Dr. Francis Collins, head of the Human Genome Project, enlisted over 150 of the world’s top geneticists to decode the human genome and they could not find a “gay” gene. It simply does not exist.

Let’s be clear here so that the Fox News crew understands. No one is “gay” or born “gay.” Instead, people engage in homosexual behavior period. No one “comes out of the closet.” Rather they are simply choosing to publicize their homosexual behavior. Further evidence that homosexuality is NOT genetic is the fluidness of homosexual behavior. As many as a third of homosexuals revert back to heterosexuality as Kinsey, Masters & Johnson and numerous other liberal sex researchers have all reported.

Moreover, the very existence of thousands of ex-homosexuals in America demonstrate how tentative homosexuality really is. And yes, due to the addictive nature of homosexual behavior, some ex-homosexuals do relapse just as some drug addicts, alcoholics and others enslaved to addictive behaviors do. No big surprise here.

However, if homosexuality is not genetic and not permanent, it is therefore caused by environmental and behavioral issues that are clearly not comparable to inborn traits like race or gender. So why are we creating a plethora of new laws based upon a sexual behavior? Let’s be clear about homosexual “rights” laws. Most of them are illegal in the sense that they have created legal scenarios that are increasingly violating the real constitutional rights of Americans.

Whenever one creates artificial rights based upon a particular behavior one is not born with, such “rights” generally come at the expense of real constitutional rights. One wouldn’t know it from watching or reading the news, but the “gay rights” movement has launched the greatest assault on our constitutional rights in our country’s history. Let me quickly summarize the various battlefronts:

Freedom of Speech/Press

  • Americans all over the country are receiving death threats for speaking out against homosexual marriage.
  • Students have been suspended from schools for voicing traditional views on marriage or wearing shirts with slogans such as “Straight Pride” Meanwhile homosexual students are allowed to wear “gay pride” t-shirts.
  • College professors have been fired for teaching traditional sexuality viewpoints.
  • A Dire Straits song was banned in Canada that contains an alleged slur about homosexuals. Similar laws are on the way in the USA.
  • Teachers and others have lost jobs for opposing the homosexual agenda on Face book on their private time.
  • The internet dating website eHarmony has been sued for not including same-sex couples.
  • YouTube has pulled videos critical of the homosexual agenda.
  • A person was detained at the Canadian border for possessing an article by this author that simply repeated the pro-pedophile statements and actions by some homosexual leaders.
  • The Obama DOJ has issued a ruling that orders federal employees to promote “Gay Pride Month.” Incredibly, it states that “silence will be interpreted as disapproval.”
  • Efforts are underway to ban actors and reality show stars like Phil Robertson for holding traditional views on sexuality.

Voting Rights/Political Participation

  • Donors to pro-traditional marriage initiatives are being harassed, threatened with death, and losing jobs and business. Just recently, the CEO of Mozilla was fired due to contributing to a pro-traditional marriage initiative in California six years earlier.
  • In at least a dozen states, pro-traditional marriage activists have been physically attacked and injured for passing out material in support of traditional marriage propositions.

Applying Justice Unequally

  • Hate crime laws are being passed by states all over the country that set up a two-tier approach to enforcing our laws. If a person assaults a crippled woman in a wheel chair and then assaults a homosexual, he will receive a heavier sentence for the latter crime. Creating different penalties for the same crime based upon the sexual behavior of the victim is clearly unconstitutional. It is also is predicated on knowing what’s in the heart of the person committing the crime, something prosecutors can never really know. Again, this is a thought-police type law and clearly a dangerous precedent.

Freedom of Religion

  • All over America Christian property owners are being harassed for refusing to rent to homosexuals and transsexuals, despite their moral objection to this lifestyle.
  • State governments and courts are forcing businesses – such as wedding cake makers – to do business with homosexual couples. But no one is forcing black businesses to work with racists.
  • State governments have fined Christian photographers because they refused to photograph homosexual weddings. But would a state fine a Jewish printer for refusing to print a Nazi brochure? Of course not.
  • Christian-based adoption agencies are being ordered by state governments to place children with homosexual families despite strong evidence that such families do NOT give the child the proper nurturing normal families provide.
  • Throughout the country, pastors who preach traditional morality are receiving death threats and their churches are being victimized with property damage.
  • Pastors in Canada and Europe are being fined and/or arrested for simply preaching what the Bible clearly teaches us about homosexual behavior. It is just a matter of time before this occurs in America.
  • An American pastor is being sued by a foreign homosexual group for a sermon that simply repeated the Biblical prohibitions against homosexuality.
  • People who hold views in opposition to the homosexual agenda are being denied employment by government agencies.
    Christians have lost private sector jobs for expressing views against the homosexual agenda in private forums that have nothing to do with their jobs.
  • Private Christian schools are being sued for refusing to hire homosexuals.
  • The Federal ENDA law will result in a tidal wave of litigation against Christian businesspersons and women for simply living out their religious beliefs.

Public Safety

  • Schools are initiating dozens of new pro-homosexual programs designed to promote the homosexual lifestyle to children as young as kindergartner age. This despite overwhelming evidence that the homosexual lifestyle is extremely dangerous and shortens one’s lifespan.
  • State laws are being passed around the country allowing males who claim to have feminine feelings to enter female bathrooms, thereby setting up situations that will lead to sexual assaults.
  • Macy’s has fired an employee for preventing a cross-dressing man from using the women’s dressing room.
  • The Obama Administration has issued a federal regulation that bans employers from prohibiting cross-dressing men from using female bathrooms.
  • State governments continue to assign troubled teens to group homes and other such programs that have long histories of homosexual molestation. These groups NEVER lose their state license.

Rights of Association

  • Despite over 3,000 molestations by homosexual scout leaders and other youth leaders, “sexual orientation” laws are being passed by states that force youth groups like the Scouts and the YMCA to accept homosexual employees.
  • California has proposed a law to ban Boy Scouts from ever serving as judges, due to the Scout’s prohibition on homosexual leaders.
  • Christian student groups are being refused school recognition if they exclude homosexual students despite clear Biblical prohibition against such behavior.
  • Students at colleges have been forced to accept a homosexual roommate and one student who refused to live with a homosexual was fined and sent to sensitivity training.
  • Hotels have been sued for refusing to rent to homosexual weddings.

Parental Rights

  • Hillary Clinton made a speech to the UN in 2011 to the effect that our homes should be monitored by the government for any discouragement of homosexuality, the parents be damned.
  • Already, in Europe and in Canada, homeschoolers have been banned from teaching against homosexuality in their own homes. I can assure you, this is coming to America.
  • States are now passing laws that remove parental permission for school programs that promote homosexuality to school children.
  • Parents have been arrested for pulling their children out of pro-homosexual school programs.
  • Christian parents have been banned from accepting foster children because they hold traditional sexuality views.

Physicians/Counselor Rights

  • Laws are being introduced to allow state governments to pull the license of fertility doctors for refusing to artificially inseminate lesbians.
  • Psychologists have been fired for refusing to give pro-homosexual counseling to homosexuals.
  • Doctors have faced career backlash for questioning sex change operations.
  • Despite thousands of homosexuals successfully undergoing therapy to change their behavior, laws have been passed that bans the right of psychologists to engage in such therapy.
  • Despite the documented harmful effects of the homosexual lifestyle, states are passing laws to prevent health care professionals and counselors to say anything to a sexually confused child that does not affirm homosexual behavior.
  • Organizations that counsel homosexuals to leave the lifestyle have been subject to death threats, harassment and property damage.
  • Students at public universities studying to be counselors have been dismissed from their programs if they hold traditional views on homosexuality.
  • Let’s be clear: homosexuals enjoy the same constitutional rights all other Americans do (and no, marriage is NOT a constitutional right) so why do we need special laws for them? It’s because such special laws are not about securing rights they already have, but rather are used to promote their agenda. That’s their strategy and they openly admit this in their strategy manuals.

When it comes to phony “bullying” laws, for example, understand that assaults against anyone are already illegal. Homosexuals are not exempt from existing laws that protect everyone else. What these so-called “bullying” laws really do is create a slew of new public school programs to propagandize students about the virtues of homosexual behavior.

It is simply bizarre that our schools spend millions on anti-drug programs but are now willing to promote programs that encourage the homosexual lifestyle. This despite reams of evidence such behavior leads to a shorter lifespan and those who engage in it disproportionately suffer from a whole array of negative life-style choices. This has been confirmed by massive long-term studies of homosexuals by both the Canadian health agency and the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), but the results of these studies were ignored by Fox News and other media conservatives.

If one claims to be a constitutionalist – like many media conservatives do – but are ignoring this massive assault on our constitutional rights, then they are simply not constitutionalists. The Fox News team seems to have adopted libertarian arguments on many of these issues, but even most libertarians are opposed to the tyrannical effect these laws are having on our culture.

Take same-sex marriage. The passage of same sex marriage laws has unleashed the power of government in many ways that are shocking. People are receiving death threats, being harassed and even losing their jobs for speaking out against it. The legalization of homosexual marriage also means the state now recognizes homosexual behavior as normal. As a result, private adoption agencies are being forced to place children with homosexual families. Ditto for foster children and group home agencies. Schools now have to teach that homosexual behavior is normal, leading thousands of school children down the path of a dangerous and unhealthy lifestyle. And, of course, if homosexuality is normal behavior, then that justifies all the “Hate Crime”, “bullying” and so called “anti-discrimination” laws now being passed all over America which have led to widespread attacks on our constitutional freedoms.

The problem, of course, is that homosexuality is not normal. Decades of research show the opposite. And the aforementioned CDC and Canadian long-term studies of thousands of homosexuals show clear cut disparities between homosexuals and heterosexuals in every lifestyle category: suicides, drug abuse, criminal activity, driving under the influence, prostitution, mental breakdowns, etc. Clearly, these are signs of an abnormal and unhealthy lifestyle.

Oh, yes, I know that the American Psychiatric Association (APA) has proclaimed homosexuality to be normal but that conclusion is not the result of any careful long-term study of homosexual lifestyles. It is the result of a secretive group of homosexual psychiatrists in 1973 taking over the committee that decides what behavior is “normal” and what is not. Homosexual behavior was removed as an abnormal behavior by a straight up and down vote with the homosexual psychiatrists prevailing. There’s wasn’t a scholarly debate or anything like that. Don’t be silly. It was pure politics. But do bear in mind that, at the time, the vast majority of APA members believed homosexuality to be abnormal.

And yet, our conservative media heroes still act as if there’s some kind of scientific consensus that homosexuality is a genetic-based normal behavior so they apparently believe all these “gay rights” battles involve normal people who are simply trying to protect their God-given rights.

To this day, I’ve never witnessed any major conservative media outlet or personality actually delve into the APA fraud, the massive CDC/Canadian homosexual lifestyle studies or even do a story on the large networks of ex-homosexuals in America today which, proves, of course, that homosexuality is a changeable behavior. Partly as a result of the refusal of the mainstream media — and later on the conservative media — to cover such stories over the last four decades, we now find ourselves on the losing end of “gay rights” battles on every front.

Even more surprising is the Pew Research study on how the media covers same sex marriage. It found that Fox News ran four times more stories supporting same sex marriage than opposing it. Nor do most people know that Fox News is a major financial sponsor of the National Lesbian and Gay Journalists Association (NLGJA), which itself monitors how Fox News covers gay issues and is constantly communicating with Fox News personalities to teach them the “correct” way to report on homosexual issues. And no, Fox News, whose slogan is “Fair and Balanced,” does not give any money to pro-traditional values groups.

Megyn Kelly is a Fox News superstar but more than most Fox News personalities, she really drinks the homosexual propaganda kool-aid. She supports homosexual marriage and often equates, on-air, the rights of blacks to the rights of homosexuals, despite the complete lack of evidence that homosexuality is an in-born trait like race is. She also uses the same phrases homosexual activists use in describing their battle for marriage rights: “marriage equality” and has referred to religious-based opponents of the homosexual agenda as “haters”, phrases right out of NLGJA’s playbook.

Unknown to most people, Kelly is deeply involved in the homosexual movement. She has appeared at a number of NLGJA events and I believe is influenced by a number of homosexual friends. This explains why she almost always takes the side of the homosexuals and rarely delves deeply into the homosexual movement’s attack on our constitutional rights.

Another Fox News superstar — Bill O’Reilly — is equally uninformed on these issues. Incredibly, O’Reilly has come out in support of the so-called “anti-discrimination” laws that have led to many of these attacks described earlier in this article. He supports homosexual adoption and has referred to Christians who opposed the homosexual agenda as “holy rollers” and “fanatics.”

Nor does O’Reilly have a problem with homosexual marriage or with Obama when he unilaterally and without congressional legislation, issued an order to allow open homosexuals in the military. For a man who describes himself as a “traditionalist” and a “culture warrior,” it’s hard to take him seriously when he’s already hoisted the white flag on some of the biggest cultural issues of the day.

Then there’s Shepard Smith, who has been “outed” by the homosexual community as one of their own. That’s no surprise. Smith has uttered favorable things about homosexual marriage and referred to those who flocked to Chick-fil- A to support their traditional marriage stance as being part of the “National Day of Intolerance.”

Fox News contributor Bernie Goldberg is also pro-homosexual and calls conservatives who oppose their agenda as “bigoted.” On his blog, Goldberg even claims Jesus Christ would be in support of homosexual marriage, a strange claim given the numerous statements by Jesus and his disciples regarding the sacred position God has assigned to the traditional male-female family. Goldberg also makes bizarre statements on his website claiming Jesus said some people are born gay, which, of course, is false. Indeed, both the Old and New Testaments are very clear in their condemnations of homosexual behavior.

Even Fox News “All-Stars” Charles Krauthammer, Stephen Hayes and George Will are in support of allowing open homosexuals in the military, seemingly ignorant of the body of research documenting how disruptive it will be for openly homosexual men and women to serve next to others in tight units where moral and unit cohesion can mean the difference between life and death. Polling of service members themselves confirm this, but Fox News has consistently downplayed or ignored the opinions of those who would be most effective by this radical policy.

Indeed, while representing San Diego in the State Legislature, I was given access to studies by the military demonstrating widespread misconduct by homosexual service members (and this was before homosexuals were allowed to serve!). They were engaged in far more crime, rape, and disruptive behavior than were heterosexual service members. Such internal studies were apparently swept under the table when it came to debating this issue in congress.

The military is NOT an equal opportunity employer or a jobs program. It is a fighting force that should reject any policy that undermines the unity of those who serve. Already, it has come to my attention that homosexual servicemen – now feeling fully protected by the White House – are engaging in open homosexual behavior in full view of their colleagues. As a result, unit cohesion is coming apart at the seams, morale is in shambles and our military is becoming weaker. Unfortunately, our media and even our conservative media, have chosen not to investigate this issue. After all, they all were in favor of this policy and now are reluctant to show how it has been a failure. Thanks for wrecking our military.

And I could go on and on with Fox News. Chris Wallace thinks those who opposed gay scout leaders should be compared to racists….Dana Perino, Kimberly Guilfoyle, Greg Gutfield and Eric Bolling all support same-sex marriage, gays in the military, and much of the gay agenda….former Fox News reporter Margaret Hoover supports much of the gay rights agenda and sits on the board of two homosexual groups… John Stossel refuses to accept that homosexuality is a changeable behavior and opposes efforts to counsel homosexuals, a strange view for a freedom-loving libertarian….Elizabeth Hasselbeck called the Pope’s opposition to homosexual marriage as “inhumane.” (For God’s sake Elizabeth, read the Bible)….Sally Kohn is a lesbian activist who shills for “gay rights” in her Fox News website columns….and on and on.

Indeed, it is hard to find any “cultural warrior” at Fox News who is really a cultural warrior and who understands the threats posed to our freedoms by the homosexual agenda. Clearly, these people are surrounded by social liberals and simply spout the liberal line on these issues. Fox News may be a champion on economic and foreign policy issues but it’s time to admit they are completely clueless – and even damaging – when it comes to the key social issues of our time.

And Fox News most conservative personality –Sean Hannity – has apparently decided to avoid these issues, seldom mentioning them or making them the subject of any of his television or radio shows. For a self-described conservative Catholic, that is rather discouraging. Meanwhile Catholic schools, adoption agencies and charities are being brutalized by the “gay rights” movement. And not a peep from Sean.

One has to wonder if the Fox News team really doesn’t understand how “gay rights’’ not only undermine America’s Christian culture but also constitute a direct attack on the more important rights given to us by our founding fathers — such as freedom of speech, religion, press, and association.

However, it’s not much different with other media conservatives outside of Fox News. Glenn Beck said on the O’Reilly show that homosexual marriage is not “a threat to the country,” a bizarre statement from an alleged social conservative. Beck also quoted Jefferson to back up his neutral stance on same sex marriage: “If it neither breaks my leg nor picks my pocket, what difference is it to me.”

But Jefferson would not have supported gay marriage or the police state tactics that homosexual marriage has brought to our culture. Despite calling himself a constitutionalist, Beck seems to know little about how our founder fathers regarded the traditional family unit as key to America’s freedom and prosperity. They believe it to be the backbone of the United States and the key to its culture. The destruction of the traditional family unit means the destruction of our culture and ultimately our country. Does Beck really not understand that? Is he really not aware of the wave of attacks on our freedoms I have described above?

It has now become quite clear that the homosexual agenda is undermining our freedoms, our families and our faith. It is disrupting our Christian culture and assaulting our constitutional rights on every conceivable front. And if you don’t think this is exactly what the homosexuals have planned all along, then you haven’t been reading their books and manifestos. Today, there are literally hundreds of lawsuits ongoing in courthouses all over America, most of them taken on by struggling small non-profit legal organizations trying desperately to preserve our constitutional freedoms.

As these legal groups attempt to preserve our rights from this onslaught, it would be nice if our conservative media personalities would start to cover these stories in a serious manner, instead of using quickie libertarian sound bites to quickly dismiss them. And they also need to please stop the frivolous “me too” reporting about so and so Hollywood star “coming out” and start investigating the real issues here. It is time for media conservatives to wake up, ignore the talking points given them by the NLGJA and start reporting how the homosexual rights agenda is compromising our constitutional rights.

Note: I would like to thank Cliff Kincaid and Peter LaBarbera for digging up much of the research regarding the conservative media’s involvement with the gay agenda. Much of this info was taken from their report published by America’s Survival (www.usasurvival.org) titled Unfair, Unbalanced and Afraid: Fox News’ Growing Pro-Homosexual Bias and the National Gay & Lesbian Journalists Association.

Print Friendly and PDF



Posting Policy

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse. Read More

  • garybryson

    This guy takes the cake for whining. So much word vomit…where to start?

    • David

      problem is much of it you can’t refute without lying. Not that you want to you’re only here to mock and not true discussion

      • L1011

        Okay, well I’ll give a likely reason why FOX News has changed their tune over the last 10 years – maybe it’s because they have gay employees, they need ratings, they are supported by advertising dollars from companies that also employ gay people, the companies advertising on FOX don’t want consumer backlash for their products and services, and FOX realizes that the younger generation doesn’t hold gay prejudices and they need younger viewers more than ever because their key demographic is dying off and younger people have more access to alternative news sources.

  • Richard

    People are not born religious, they choose to be religious and yet we have laws protecting them from discrimination because of their choice of religion, right!
    This guy seems to have his entire life wrapped up in anti gay stuff, actually this web site seems to be dedicated to anti gay stuff.
    Chill, relax, get a life and just let everyone else live theirs. :-)

    • Mark Robn

      Richard said — Chill, relax, get a life and just let everyone else live theirs. :-)

      Response — Said the pot to the kettle.

      Ditto to the pervert. Just keep your perverted behavior in your bedrooms, chill out – relax, and just let other people produce goodness and virtue, in society and the media. We have enough evil in the world already.

  • Ray – Jesus is the Son of God.

    2 Timothy 3:

    This know also, that in the last days perilous times shall come. For men shall be lovers of their ownselves, covetous, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, Without natural affection, trucebreakers, false accusers, incontinent, fierce, despisers of those that are good, Traitors, heady, highminded, lovers of pleasures more than lovers of God; Having a form of godliness, but denying the power thereof: from such turn away. For of this sort are they which creep into houses, and lead captive silly women laden with sins, led away with divers lusts, Ever learning, and never able to come to the knowledge of the truth. Now as Jannes and Jambres withstood Moses, so do these also resist the truth: men of corrupt minds, reprobate concerning the faith. But they shall proceed no further: for their folly shall be manifest unto all men, as theirs also was.

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Stephen-Marcus/1049730743 Stephen Marcus Colmar

      Please stop the cut & paste spam. You seem unable to independently reply without leaning on other people’s (your minister?) talking points.
      You seem way too interested in gay people, have devoted much time and energy to reading up on the topic.
      You’ve probably watched gay-themes movies to better you understanding, maybe even the X rated ones?
      I suggest you read real stats. Lesbians do not die at 45 & a majority of gay men don’t have parasites.

      • helligusvart

        You just can’t stand it when someone points out the facts, can you?

        • http://www.facebook.com/people/Stephen-Marcus/1049730743 Stephen Marcus Colmar

          Those aren’t facts but a mix and match of 1980s AIDS data meshed with down righty silly stereotypes.
          I respect actual information but not hate-motivated, silly lies.

  • Ray – Jesus is the Son of God.

    Some statistics about the Homosexual lifestyle:

    • One study reports 70% of homosexuals admitting to having sex only one time with over 50% of their partners (3).

    • One study reports that the average homosexual has between 20 and 106 partners per year (6). The average heterosexual has 8 partners in a lifetime.

    • Many homosexual sexual encounters occur while drunk, high on drugs, or in an orgy setting (7).

    • Many homosexuals don’t pay heed to warnings of their lifestyles: “Knowledge of health guidelines was quite high, but this knowledge had no relation to sexual behavior” (16).

    • Homosexuals got homosexuality removed from the list of mental illnesses in the early 70s by storming the annual American Psychiatric Association (APA) conference on successive years. “Guerrilla theater tactics and more straight-forward shouting matches characterized their presence” (2). Since homosexuality has been removed from the APA list of mental illnesses, so has pedophilia (except when the adult feels “subjective distress”) (27).

    • Homosexuals account for 3-4% of all gonorrhea cases, 60% of all syphilis cases, and 17% of all hospital admissions (other than for STDs) in the United States (5). They make up only 1-2% of the population.

    • Homosexuals live unhealthy lifestyles, and have historically accounted for the bulk of syphilis, gonorrhea, Hepatitis B, the “gay bowel syndrome” (which attacks the intestinal tract), tuberculosis and cytomegalovirus (27).

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Stephen-Marcus/1049730743 Stephen Marcus Colmar

      Pedophiles, not gays, molest children. That is, unless you wish to blame hetrosexuality for men abusing little girls.
      If that be the case, straight people would be more dangerous than gays because the rates of opposite sex molestation are higher.
      Use your mind.

      • Ray – Jesus is the Son of God.

        1). A man who touches a boy in a sexual way is a homosexual.

        2). They are homosexuals not gays.

        3). Your George Soros talking points don’t work on me.

        Revelation 20
        11And I saw a great white throne, and him that sat on it, from whose face the earth and the heaven fled away; and there was found no place for them.

        12And I saw the dead, small and great, stand before God; and the books were opened: and another book was opened, which is the book of life: and the dead were judged out of those things which were written in the books, according to their works.

        13And the sea gave up the dead which were in it; and death and hell delivered up the dead which were in them: and they were judged every man according to their works.

        14And death and hell were cast into the lake of fire. This is the second death.

        15And whosoever was not found written in the book of life was cast into the lake of fire.

        • http://www.facebook.com/people/Stephen-Marcus/1049730743 Stephen Marcus Colmar

          So, by your logic there are no pedophiles? Those evil men who molest little girls are mere heterosexuals?
          Next you will say straights who molest little girls are “normal”, by virtue of orientation because the word pedophile isn’t used in King James.

          Logic skills have nothing to do Soros.

    • garybryson

      cut and paste spam. you need new arguments

  • Ray – Jesus is the Son of God.

    • 73% of psychiatrists say homosexuals are less happy than the average person, and of those psychiatrists, 70% say that the unhappiness is NOT due to social stigmatization (13).

    • 25-33% of homosexuals and lesbians are alcoholics (11).

    • Of homosexuals questioned in one study reports that 43% admit to 500 or more partners in a lifetime, 28% admit to 1000 or more in a lifetime, and of these people, 79% say that half of those partners are total strangers, and 70% of those sexual contacts are one night stands (or, as one homosexual admits in the film “The Castro”, one minute stands) (3). Also, it is a favorite past-time of many homosexuals to go to “cruisy areas” and have anonymous sex.

    • 78% of homosexuals are affected by STDs (20).

    • The Los Angeles Police says, “30,000 sexually abused children in Los Angeles were victims of homosexuals” (10).

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Stephen-Marcus/1049730743 Stephen Marcus Colmar

      I don’t believe depression is some byproduct of homosexuality.
      Articles like this, comments like yours with inaccurate paste and copy stats, hate crimes, familial strife and societal marginalization are all logical reasons for a gay man or woman to feel depressed.
      Other minority populations such as blacks and undocumented workers also have higher rates of depression.
      You don’t seriously think same sex attraction is the cause, do you?
      Think about it…

    • garybryson

      cut and paste spammer

    • Anthony Rivera

      Shockingly I know for a fact all these numbers are wrong…. just like everything in this article. And the human genome project actually did find the gay gene…. 2 of them

      • Ray – Jesus is the Son of God.

        Isaiah 5:20
        Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil;
        that put darkness for light, and light for darkness;
        that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!

        • Glen

          That’s right Ray. Woe unto you.

  • Ray – Jesus is the Son of God.

    • 50% of suicides can be attributed to homosexuals (10).

    • It takes approximately $300,000 to take care of each AIDS victim, so thanks to the promiscuous lifestyle of homosexuals, medical insurance rates have been skyrocketing for all of us(10).

    • Homosexuals were responsible for spreading AIDS in the United States, and then raised up violent groups like Act Up and Ground Zero to complain about it. Even today, homosexuals account for well over 50% of the AIDS cases in the United States, which is quite a large number considering that they account for only 1-2% of the population.

    • Homosexuals account for a disproportionate number of hepatitis cases: 70-80% in San Francisco, 29% in Denver, 66% in New York City, 56% in Toronto, 42% in Montreal, and 26% in Melbourne (8).

    • garybryson

      quit spamming ray ray

  • Ray – Jesus is the Son of God.

    • 37% of homosexuals engage in sadomasochism, which accounts for many accidental deaths. In San Francisco, classes were held to teach homosexuals how to not kill their partners during sadomasochism (8).

    • 41% of homosexuals say they have had sex with strangers in public restrooms, 60% say they have had sex with strangers in bathhouses, and 64% of these encounters have involved the use of illegal drugs (8).

    • Depending on the city, 39-59% of homosexuals are infected with intestinal parasites like worms, flukes and amoebae, which is common in filthy third world countries (8).

    • The median age of death of homosexuals is 42 (only 9% live past age 65). This drops to 39 if the cause of death is AIDS. The median age of death of a married heterosexual man is 75 (8). [This is a reduction in the length of life by 44% (33/75 = 44%)

    • The median age of death of lesbians is 45 (only 24% live past age 65). The median age of death of a married heterosexual woman is 79 (8).

    • Homosexuals are 100 times more likely to be murdered (usually by another homosexual) than the average person, 25 times more likely to commit suicide, and 19 times more likely to die in a traffic accident (8).

    • 21% of lesbians die of murder, suicide or traffic accident, which is at a rate of 534 times higher than the number of white heterosexual females aged 25-44 who die of these things(8).

    • Gowdy_The_Pinhead

      How long have you been int he closet?

      • Ray – Jesus is the Son of God.

        Your screen name fits you.

        • Gowdy_The_Pinhead

          I bet you got a lot of dick in the corp!

          • Glen

            That’s not a picture of him. It’s a picture of someone he lusts after.

        • Gowdy_The_Pinhead

          So you think trey gowdy looks like a pinhead too?!

    • garybryson

      and yet even more SPAM!

    • DrMaxHathaway

      Thanks RAY — would you please provide a source for your statistics.—Prefer original, authoritative source, if you can.

  • Bobby McGuire

    I hate superlatives, but this is the most ridiculous piece of fact twisting claptrap I’ve read on this website that seems bent of topping the idiocy it published the day before.

    • Guest

      So why come here? Are you a masochist?
      Go get your freak on somewhere else, weirdo.

      • Gowdy_The_Pinhead

        We come to LAUGH at the RETARDED Hillbillies here!

        • Guest

          Then why are you crying?
          You poor little poofter, there there.
          It’ll all be over soon.

    • Cheyenne W.

      Yes, but it’s fun to watch them all squeal… The fact that they are so worried gives me a good laugh and great pleasure. Not sure what I am going to do for a laugh after we have same sex marriage nationwide.

  • Dannyboy

    Some reasons that media conservatives are so weak on homosexual issues:
    They may know homosexuals and thus be hesitant to take a strong position.
    They may fear that corporations will withdraw sponsorship of their programs.
    They may in fact be as stupid as some liberals say they are.

    • ricky

      Remember, many people employed at so-called “conservative” radio and TV are conservative or fiscally conservative (but not conservative on social issues) because that’s the philosophy of the station they are currently at. Tomorrow they may appear at a different station and in line with the Left. Many of them were not born and raised in Christian/conservative homes. Many buy into the smaller government conservativism, but not the rest. Take it from a long-time member of the media who has rubbed shoulders with a lot of media folks.

      • Dannyboy

        Ricky, please spell it out. Name names. Give examples. It is not the time to hold back. The country is sinking.

  • iconoclast12

    Barber is obsessed with gays. Here’s some facts, 55% of us don’t care if gays marry, 44% of the population can now have gay marriage. Barber should focus on why 50% of straight marriages fail. Gays marrying do not one iota hurt the “institution” of marriage, no more than straights have done on their own.

  • DC/Tex

    Very good article!
    Homosexuality will NEVER be natural, healthy (mentally or physically), normal, accepted, or OK!
    Homosexuals (not PC gays) WERE NOT BORN THAT WAY, they CHOOSE their UNNATURAL lifestyle, so, homosexuality does not qualify as a civil rights discrimination issue.
    Homosexuals had equal rights, now they have special rights and want more. Every special right awarded to homosexuals infringes on our rights.
    Homosexuality is the worst of the worst destructive lifestyles!
    The homosexual “AGENDA” is the worst disease infecting and destroying the morals and family values of the USA, the world, and children (their main target).
    God loves everyone, as we all should, including homosexuals. God hates all sin, as we all should, including homosexuality and He says it is an abomination.

    • Gowdy_The_Pinhead

      Please tell us all about the day you chose to be straight!

      • DC/Tex

        No choice needed, natural and normal, as God created everyone.

    • ZnSD

      Too late stupid. It already is normal natural and healthy. Suck it.

  • Mikeyh0

    Sounds like the war is raging and Christians and those who oppose homosexuality in all its manifestations are on the losing end. I personally hate that but it is becoming more true everyday as this article chronicles. I canceled my cable years ago. I do not do business with Nabisco, Target and other businesses that have proclaimed their support of the LGBT agenda. But when the media have been clearly compromised to such an extent and the activist judges are overturning the will of the people, there is not much else I can do. I pray a lot, too.

    • L1011

      You must not fly often since the major airlines in America all score rather high on the HRC ratings scale.

      • Mikeyh0

        I have no idea what you’re talking about.

    • Jeanette Victoria

      I’ve not been much of a consumer of TV since the 70′s had cable for 10 years in the 90′s dumped it again. I have and old analog TV so I can’t get the digital channels.

      • Mikeyh0

        Who has the time, anyway? Survivor has been on 14 years; I’ve never seen it. Or Dancing with the Stars. I do like the Mentalist and Elementary, however. And Craig Ferguson. The websites that offer these shows are all over the place.

        • http://www.facebook.com/people/Stephen-Marcus/1049730743 Stephen Marcus Colmar

          Ferguson is pro gay rights.

    • Anthony Rivera

      So you don’t use google, yahoo, facebook, windows, android, or mac? How are you on here commenting then? Those companies are severely pro gay rights.

  • Rockon

    I think the issue here is two-fold here; (1.) that many people in the media and politics sell out to the highest homosexual activist bidder and/or (2.) they have a close friend or family memmber caught up in homosexuality who has guilted them with the usual victim-card passion play.

    • ricky

      Also: big media in big liberal cities live in a liberal cocoon and often default to leftward thinking. Many of them would never have gotten into media in the first place if they were born-again Christians.

      • Jeanette Victoria

        Liberalism is the default world view in today’s society and it’s lies are taught the moment the TV is switched on and further reinforced when kids go to school from K-college

  • bookworm

    Refutation is simple. All anyone has to say is that until it can be irrevocably proven scientifically that homosexuality is not a choice, then it should be treated as in the same way we treat the choice to take opiates: Homosexuality and opiates both quickly become addictive, fundamentally and societaly change one’s personality, lifestyle, and eventually is detrimental to one’s health.

    • L1011

      Don’t forget religion, especially Christianity. That too is a choice, is highly addictive, and plagues the user with some harsh side-effects such as an arrogant sense of superiority and an inability to think rationally or use critical thinkng skills.

      • thisoldspouse

        Religion may be a choice, but it is explicitly listed in the US Constitution, and that of all the States, as an inalienable right.

        • Rockon

          The “religion is a choice” argument is faulty, because the results of Christianity when acted out is typically prayer, worship, and speech (as it witnessing, sermons, etc), while the logical end result of homosexual attractions when acted out is homosexual sex. When they use this argument, they are also inadvertently admitting that they believe homosexual feelings and sex is what they worship as their “god.”

          • Rockon

            If you really pay attention to how they use the term “sexual
            orientation,” you can see that it is an abstract ambiguous term that they have the utmost blind faith in. It is their religion, and yes, they are extremely dogmatic about it.

          • Mikeyh0

            That term “sexual orientation” – can also – and eventually will be – applied to all manner of activity. Pedophilia, etc. What is to stop that? Another reason Christians must respond to the LGBT agenda.

          • Kyle

            You are confusing sexual orientation with sexuality. The word “sexual” in sexual orientation refers to gender not sexual acts.

          • Rockon

            So “sexual orientation” now means what biological sex (gender) one thinks they are, and no longer has anything to do with attraction or inclination?

          • Kyle

            The word “sexual” in sexual orientation or sexual preference has always referred to sex as in gender, not sex as in activity. Most people have a sexual orientation or preference even if you have never been sexually active.

          • Rockon

            Yes, I understand that “sexual orientation” refers to romantic or sexual preference. So what scientific method is used to show that “sexual orientation” is real? That is, what is the empirical evidence that homosexuality is a uniform attribute across individuals, has it’s own DNA, that sexual attraction never fluctuates, and homosexuality can easily be measured? Where is it located? On the liver? The ear lobe? The pancreas? If we have a “sexual orientation” why can’t doctors identify our “sexual orientation” when we are born? Do I get it at Walmart in a bucket? What are the scientifically observable elements of sexuality besides the sexual organs and the chemical and hormonal processes that flow from it? And does proof of “sexual orientation” mean that the behavior that flows from it, should be affirmed, encouraged? If “sexual orientation” is no different than say race (skin color) and homosexual sex is a result of homosexual attraction when acted out, can you please tell us what behavior black skin color results in when acted out? If “sexual orientation” exists, can you please show me a picture of one? If it is invisible, what kind of instrument do you use to measure it? Electricity is measured by voltage meters. Thoughts can be measured with lie detector devices and with medical equipment. Meteorologists have instruments to measure wind. Where’s the MRI and/or CAT scan data for “sexual orientation? Can you really not see you have place blind faith into something very abstract and highly ambiguous? Can you really not see that “sexual orientation” is a concept in which it takes more faith than logic and reason to believe in? Can you not see that “sexual orientation” is essentially their magic skydaddy?

          • Kyle

            No “sexual” or “gender” orientation refers to the gender to which someone is romantically , sexually and emotionally attracted.

            What are you talking about? Sexual, emotional and romantic attraction can be tested for and gauged in verity of ways under laboratory conditions, in everything from penile plethysmograph tests, pupil dilation tests, No-Lie MRIs, to pheromone tests or even psychoanalysis.

          • Rockon

            Penile Plethysmorgraph tests are criticized a great deal, but your reference to that implies that it’s about sex. Pupil dialation can occur for reason not due to sexual arousal, and a person’s pupil doesn’t always dialate when they are aroused.
            No-Lie MRIs? What? Where? Have anything scientific I can read re: these No-Lie MRIs? The positron emission tomography (PET) shows in some cases that pheromones from estrogen compound in females have shown to cause men to experience increased blood flow to the hypothalamus, but they show little to no effect of pheromones from testosterone having the same effect on women.
            Does that make all women lesbians then? Psychoanalysis deals with current feelings in relationship to childhood and and adolescent experiences. Telling your shrink “I desire this” or “I’m attracted to that” doesn’t confirm that “sexual orientation” is empirical fact and scientific truth.

          • Kyle

            Again what are you talking about? I only mentioned a few of the ways by which sexual orientation can be tested for. There are many other ways which it can be tested for, such as monitoring heart rate and changes in body heat when confronted with different stimuli and while some tests may not be entirely conclusive alone, several tests together can certainly prove and confirm sexual orientation. But by all means if you want to pretend that everyone on earth is lying about their sexual orientation or that that these tests are all lacking even when preformed under empirical conditions and in parallel as penile plethysmograph, heart rate monitoring, body heat monitoring and pupil dilation usually are, by all means go for it, I won’t stop you!

          • Rockon

            I never said that people with same sex attraction are lying about their attraction. I’m simply asking for empirical evidence of “sexual orientation” from a scientific standpoint. Haven’t people felt something about something or someone only to learn their feelings were wrong and/or misguided? And heart rate and body heat can be effected by many environmental and medical conditions. Can you prove that two people who love each other and are physically attracted to each other always have an elevation in body temp and heart beat. Be careful. ..you’re ending up admitting that it’s only about sex afterall.

          • Kyle

            When it comes to sexual orientation, the research shows that any kind of change is extremely rare, even among those who are extremely highly motivated and undergoing prolonged therapeutic sexual orientation change efforts (SOCE). Yes, of course you can, you ask both to wear heart rate monitors for a period of time and give both journals to log experiences and then cross reference and find if their heart rate elevates during romantic events, again they can be tested for and It is actually quite easy. Again these tests are often run in parallel, a medical condition may account for a false positive in one test, but not in all of them together.

        • Dan

          Belief, is a protected cholce. Liberty is also protected.

    • Dan

      Marriage is not inherently harmful.
      The constitution protects liberty and choice of belief. Your denial that orientation is not a choice, fails to provide a rational reason to restrict equal liberty and protections of the laws.

      • bookworm

        Your double negative supports sexual orientation is a choice. Marriage or the single life is also a choice. Marriage laws are for society’s protection of the unit that provides the next generation of citizens, and ensures the proper and orderly genealogical inheritance of property.

        • Dan

          Whether one believes sexual orientation is a choice or not, is irrelevant.

          Belief is protected. Liberty is protected.

          You can belive what you choose, as long as you don’t restrict the equal rights of others to do the same.

          Your beliefs about marriage are your own. They are not requirements of law. No children are required, though they benefit from having married parents.

          Sex is not even requred for marriage. Marriage is a fundamental right of all persons. Restrictions must provide compelling, rational protections for the equal rights of others, and the restriction on gender fails that test. People will continue to get married, and some will choose to include children.

          • bookworm

            Marriage is no more a fundamental right than is driving a car or the right to have sex with another person who is not agreeable. A whole lot of if-thens is involved in marriage. And you are missing the point: Society specifically has traditionally had marriage laws to protect the procreating pair (legally treated as a single unit), used this single unit and mixing of DNA to form aliances, and protecting the orderly transference of goods through lineal inheritance.

          • Anthony Rivera

            Cite a source that says marriage isn’t a civil right? Preferably a legal source… I can cite loving v virginia’s ruling that explicitly states marriage is a fundamental right. But I haven’t found a single source that ever says the opposite in any legal text.

          • bookworm

            If the Virginia ruling said such a thing, then I must point out that the jurists have confused the meaning of “marriage” with that of “love,” “commitment,” “contract,” etc., and before the glorification of the quest and attainment of what we call “romantic love” — previously only sought by what were deemed the lower orders who were governed by their emotions — such mistakes would never have been made by a seated jurist.

    • Anthony Rivera

      It was actually proven a few days ago. The human genome project found not 1, but 2 gay genes….. so I guess case closed

      • bookworm

        If your info was generally accepted scientific proof, then the gay community would be putting it on billboards and taking out ads in the newspapers, tv and radio. A gene(s)? Could it be a defective gene? Look at diseases/conditions science says are caused by defective genes. Do we stop trying to relieve/cure the condition? Do we stop trying to find a way to “fix” the gene? We live in a fallen world of disease and defective genes. God decides right and wrong: The ultimate human arrogance is for man to decide what is right and what is wrong. Therefore, if a gene iIS the cause of homosexuality, then it is a condition of the fall of man. Condoning what God deems wrong, is no better than ceasing research into cystic fibrosis.

  • RJLigier

    Excellent article, but those within the conservative media are closeted. Better to understand your adversary and their psychopathology to address the fraud that permeates the APAs and the judiciary to manipulate those unfamiliar with the behaviors. We know that homosexuals and bisexuals are not the victims they have been portrayed to be since the revision of the ALIMPC in 1955 based on the fraudulent and fallacious research of Alfred Kinsey.

  • Nos Rob

    Yawn. Yet another post about homosexuality. You Christians
    think about it, write about it, shout about it, post about it and are
    generally more preoccupied with it far more than gay people themselves.

    • Rockon

      Christians didn’t start this. The very definition and nature of homosexual ACTIVISM is what is taking what should be a private bedroom matter and making it an in everybody’s faces public matter.

    • Jeanette Victoria

      Rewriting history isn’t going to work…the whole push for putting homosexuality on the front burner and bedrooms on Main St has come from homosexuals not the other way around!

      • Nos Rob

        Arguably you did start it, by denying homosexuals their human rights, calling them abominations and droning on about their ‘sin’, Be that as it may, aren’t you required to turn the other cheek? Or does Jesus’ teaching not apply to Christians today?

        • Jeanette Victoria

          That is of course more homosexual propaganda, homosexuals have the same rights as everyone else. They want special rights.

          Homosexuality IS disordered, just because the big lie is repeated over that homosex is normal doesn’t make true; one only need simple biology to realize that truth.

          • Nos Rob

            I see. So turning the other cheek doesn’t apply any more, then.

            How about going the extra mile? Praying for those you feel persecute you? Loving your enemies? Serving others? Have these been junked too? Just asking so we can be clear about what Christians believe these days.

            if this site is anything to go by, then the belief that homosexuals are disordered, evil liars is all that matters.

            And you say you don’t oppress them!

  • http://publiushuldah.wordpress.com/ Publius Huldah

    Interesting and very well written! Steve Baldwin shows how the phony “conservatives” on FOX News, as well as State Governments all over the Country, are trampling our Constitution for the benefit of the radical homosexual agenda. And
    of course, Sean Hannity – that great Constitutionalist – and proclaimed Catholic – is SILENT on this issue.

    And to proponents of a so-called “Convention of States”: Note the complicity of State Governments in pushing the pro-homosexual agenda by punishing those who oppose it. Please explain how the States will protect us from the feds at an Article V convention.

  • Rev Michael

    Excellent, Thanks Steve – would to God that this article could get into every main stream media outlet on the planet.

  • Jarhead

    Because many are queer! (AKA: sexually perverted).

  • http://www.maplesministries.org/ Steve Maples

    “We must never never never give up” Winston Churchill.

    We Christians who know homosexuality to be perverse and SIN, must never stop speak out the Word of God in Christian love as Jesus did. We must never capitulate, we must never appease perversion, we must never surrender our GOD GIVEN FREEDOM OF SPEECH AND CONSCIENCE.

    • Gowdy_The_Pinhead

      You LOSE! Marriage equality WILL be the LAW in ALL 50 states VERY soon!

      • http://www.maplesministries.org/ Steve Maples

        Even if all 50 states capitulate, that battle may be lost, but the war has already been won. Someday soon and very soon, you are going to see the KING, (no, his name is not Obama), and you and I, and every human being will bow, but not bow like the homosexuals are doing now, but bow to the King of Kings and Lord of Lords, and every tongue will confess, regardless if they believe it or not, that Christ Jesus is the Son of God and is LORD. This is the great day of reckoning. Nobody has to go to hell, every person has the choice to meet Christ on that day as either their Savior, or their judge.

  • Wendell Gragg

    Ok, one minor correction, and only to keep your credibility. The APA is NOT the American Psychiatrist Association. The APA that you need to refer to is the American Psychological Association. They produce the DSM and they are the ones who removed homosexuality from the list of mental illnesses.

    When you make mistakes like that, it just gives the other side ammunition to discredit you.

    • mortimer007

      Excellent, Wendell. I was just about to comment on this. The article
      refers to the American Psychiatrist Association as refusing to confirm
      that people are born homosexual; then later the American Psychiatry
      Association proclaiming homosexuality to be normal.
      The confusion about these bodies and their standpoints needs to be clarified.

      • Wendell Gragg

        Thanks. I know it may seem nit-picky to some, but the other side jumps on every little error to make us look like uneducated rubes, so I thought I would bring that up.

        • mortimer007

          Right. What is the DSM?
          And did the American Psychological Association refuse to confirm that people are born homosexual?

          • Wendell Gragg

            It is the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of mental disorders. The DSM-5 just came out recently. It essentially lists and defines mental disorders recognized by the psychological community.

            Prior to the 1970′s, the APA had homosexuality listed in the DSM as a mental disorder. In 1973, the pro-homosexual community within the APA was able to pull some political stunts to get it voted out of the manual. As the author stated, they were able to stack the appropriate committees and removed it from the draft. I would have to go way back into some of my old articles about it to get more detail…if I even still have them.

          • Kyle

            So you’re just going to ignore the mountain of work done into homosexuality by researchers like Evelyn Hooker and many others in the decades prior to it’s declassification? The work which showed definitively and demonstrably that homosexuals with no history of mental illness were no more or less likely to suffer from adjustment issues or mental pathologies than were heterosexuals with similar mental health histories? Talk about re-writing history!

          • charter123

            I’m sorry Kyle, you’re wrong. This is Steve Baldwin, the author of the above piece. The Hooker study has been widely discredited. She only studied 30 people and her methodology was so full of errors its not taken seriously by experts in this field. And, no there isn’t a “mountain of work” in support of the idea that homosexual behavior is normal. Never has been. Any legitimate study of a particular lifestyle needs to look at hundreds of subjects over a period of many years in order to be a legitimate study and ALL such studies have shown homosexuals to have much higher rates than heterosexuals in every area: crime, drug abuse, suicide, etc. There aren’t any long term studies showing homosexuality to be normal. Here’s an abstract from a study on Hooker’s methodology from the Marriage & Family Review journal:

            ABSTRACT Evelyn Hooker’s research comparing the mental health of 30 male homosexuals to 30 male heterosexuals may be the most influential study in the history of social science. The American Psychological Association (APA) claims her work was the major reason it began advocating for acceptance of homosexuality. It led the American Psychiatric Association in 1973 to eliminate homosexuality from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. And it impacted the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2003 legalization of sodomy in Lawrence v Texas.Hooker reportedly believed experts would be unable to distinguish homosexuals from heterosexuals on psychological tests. Re-examination of her work indicates that Hooker’s study was neither rigorous nor reliable. Among other problems, homosexual subjects were easily identified on test protocols; her reports of how she obtained her samples were incomplete and contradictory; and her study generated results supportive of obsession/compulsivity in homosexuals.Thus Hooker’s study was seriously flawed. Moreover, because it was marketed by the APA as central in transforming homosexual activity from an illness/crime into acceptable behavior—yet Hooker did not correct those who mischaracterized her work—APA misrepresentations of Hooker over the past 40 years appear to be more in line with ideology than science.

          • Kyle

            Your proof that Hooker has been discredited comes from Paul and Kirk Cameron? Seriously Mr. Baldwin? Paul Cameron is one of the most discredited researchers in history!

          • charter123

            Actually, the Camerons are only “discredited” in the eyes of the homosexual community because they have the audacity to expose facts about the homosexual agenda that no one else will write about. I’ve looked into every allegation against him — Paul Cameron was removed from APA membership, etc, etc, and they all turned out to be false, which is why serious peer-reviewed journals continue to accept his work. So Kyle, instead of personal attacks upon the Camerons, I challenge you to read his critique of the Hooker study and show me specifically where he is inaccurate or used flawed methodology. I will be waiting.

          • Kyle

            Actually the Cameron’s are discredited by pretty much everyone. I mean pre-1996 AIDS obit “studies” to prove that all homosexuals die 20 years younger? Come on that’s a joke right?

          • charter123

            Mr. Cameron never made such a statement and of course, I would not support such views if he did. As for his survey of obit studies, media surveys are a common methodology used by researchers but they have severe limitations and he admits that. But the value of his study is enhanced when compared to more in depth studies of homosexual lifespan and Cameron’s results are confirmed. See, for example, this study:

            Hogg RS, Streathdee SA, Craib KJ. Modeling the impact of HIV disease on mortality in gay and bisexual men. 1997;26:657-661.

            Hogg concludes the lifespan of homosexual is around 20 years less than heterosexuals. There have been more recent studies with similar conclusions. I am not aware of any studies of homosexual morbidity that show them to have normal lifespans.

          • charter123

            I forgot to name the journal: The international Journal of Epidemiology

          • Kyle

            He said just that in an interview on the David Parkman show in February of this year, the unedited interview can be seen on YouTube, if you’re interested.

            His Obit studies are complete bunk, there is absolutly nothing redeeming about them whatsoever.

            You mean the same Hoggs and Steathdee who said this?

            “In our paper, we demonstrated that in a major Canadian centre, life expectancy at age 20 years for gay and bisexual men is 8 to 21 years less than for all men. If the same pattern of mortality continued, we estimated that nearly half of gay and bisexual men currently aged 20 years would not reach their 65th birthday. Under even the most liberal assumptions, gay and bisexual men in this urban centre were experiencing a life expectancy similar to that experienced by men in Canada in the year 1871. In contrast, if we were to repeat this analysis today the life expectancy of gay and bisexual men would be greatly improved. Deaths from HIV infection have declined dramatically in this population since 1996. As we have previously reported there has been a threefold decrease in mortality in Vancouver as well as in other parts of British Columbia.”

            And who released this addendum to their original survey?

            Hogg RS, O’Shaughnessy MV, Gataric N et al. Decline in deaths from AIDS due to new antiretrovirals (letter). Lancet 1997;349:1294.

          • charter123

            Yes, of course, with the new anti-AIDS medications it has allowed homosexuals to live longer but you notice that Hogg
            says the “life expectancy of gay and bisexual men would be greatly improved.” Hoff argues that life expectancy is improved but he does not argue that the life expectancy of homosexuals is the same at heterosexuals because it isn’t, so my point remains valid. Moreover, Hogg’s original study came out a year after Cameron’s obit study and confirmed Cameron’s research to a T, again confirming that Cameron’s work on this issue was accurate.

          • Kyle

            Actually new research out of the U.K. says the the life expectancy for HIV+ homosexual males is expected to surpass the national average in the next few years [1]. Moreover, The life expectancy for a healthy homosexual male is on average exactly the same as that for a healthy heterosexual male and the vast majority of homosexual males are HIV and Hepatitis -.

            Actually no it didn’t Hogg’s never claimed his research was representative of all homosexuals (he actually went to great pains to admonish anyone who attempted to misrepresent his data as such), Cameron did, Hoggs admitted the major limitations of his findings, Cameron did not. Cameron is a joke, nothing more, nothing less. And to think you tried to impugn the work of Hooker, one of the most respected researchers into homosexuality in history!

            [1] May M et al. Life expectancy of HIV-1-positive individuals approaches normal, conditional on response to antiretroviral therapy: UK collaborative HIV cohort study. Eleventh International Congress on Drug Therapy in HIV Infection, Glasgow, abstract O133, 2012

          • charter123

            None of the research you cite proves that life expectancy for both homosexual and heterosexuals are the same. “Approaching normal” or “expected to surpass” are not scientific terms. Life expectancy will never be the same because its not just AIDS, its a whole array of dangerous lifestyle choices made by homosexuals. This was all confirmed by the long term CDC and Canadian studies I mentioned in my article. These studies are the largest studies of homosexual lifestyles completed to date and they show much higher rates of crime, suicide, drug abuse, etc. among homosexuals. No one has yet refuted these studies which followed hundreds of homosexuals for many years.
            Hooker’s tiny, short term study involved 30 subjects and has been ripped apart by many other professionals. Hooker is the joke, not Cameron.

          • Kyle

            Hey if you wanna keep parroting FRC’s misrepresentations of other peoples work despite the protestations of the authors, go for it I’m not going to stop you… But the reality is despite higher risks, healthy homosexuals live just as long as health heterosexuals no matter how much you really wish that wasn’t true! And every study that you cite shows that the majority of homosexuals are healthy, well adjusted members of society…

            Who else other than Cameron the clown?

          • Dan

            The life expecancy of people with HIV is not the same as for those without HIV. Yet the information is used to claim all gay people have a shortened life span, while ignoring they are talking about straight and gay people with HIV, not all gay people.
            This is a clear misuse of information in order to stigmatize and justify harming gay people.

          • Kyle

            Also 8 – 21 years does not equal around 20 years.

          • Kyle

            Tell me Mr. Baldwin, do you also share Mr. Cameron’s belief that that there is room on the table for the death penalty for homosexuality?

          • Kyle

            “Paul Cameron (Nebraska) was dropped from membership for a violation of the Preamble to the Ethical Principles of Psychologists.”

            APA – 1983

            “The Nebraska Psychological Association formally disassociates itself from the representations and interpretations of scientific literature offered by Dr. Paul Cameron in his writings and public statements on sexuality.”

            NPA – 1984

            “Dr. Paul Cameron has consistently misinterpreted and misrepresented sociological research on sexuality, homosexuality, and lesbianism, Dr. Paul Cameron has repeatedly campaigned for the abrogation of the civil rights of lesbians and gay men, substantiating his call on the basis of his distorted interpretation of this research”

            American Sociological Association – 1985.

            WHEREAS Dr. Paul Cameron, a psychologist, was dropped from membership in The American Psychological Association for violation of the Preamble to the Ethical Principles of Psychologists;

            WHEREAS Dr. Paul Cameron has been presented in the media as a sociologist;

            WHEREAS Dr. Paul Cameron has consistently misinterpreted and misrepresented sociological research on sexuality, homosexuality, and lesbianism;

            WHEREAS Dr. Paul Cameron has repeatedly campaigned for the abrogation of the civil rights of lesbians and gay men, substantiating his call on the basis of his distorted interpretation of this research;

            WHEREAS the American Sociological Association is on record as opposing oppressive actions against lesbians and gay men and affirming its commitment to their civil rights;

            THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED: THAT the Association reaffirms its opposition to efforts to undermine the civil rights of lesbians and gay men through the distortion of sociological concepts and the falsifying of sociological research; and

            THAT the Association articulates this opposition by charging the Committee on the Status of Homosexuals in Sociology with the task of critically evaluating and publicly responding to the work of Dr. Paul Cameron.

            1985 – ASA resolution.

            (i) his sworn statement that “homosexuals are approximately 43 times more apt to commit crimes than is the general population” is a total distortion of the Kinsey data upon which he relies – which, as is obvious to anyone who reads the report, concerns data from a non-representative sample of delinquent homosexuals (and Dr. Cameron compares this group to college and non-college heterosexuals);

            (ii) his sworn statement that “homosexuals abuse children at a proportionately greater incident than do heterosexuals” is based upon the same distorted data – and, the Court notes, is directly contrary to other evidence presented at trial besides the testimony of Dr. Simon and Dr. Marmour. (553 F. Supp. 1121 at 1130 n.18.)

            - Baker v. Wade 1985

            The Canadian Psychological Association takes the position that Dr. Paul Cameron has consistently misinterpreted and misrepresented research on sexuality, homosexuality, and lesbianism and thus, it formally disassociates itself from the representation and interpretations of scientific literature in his writings and public statements on sexuality.

            CPA – 1996

          • charter123

            Dr. Cameron resigned his membership from the APA due to its politicization of research on the homosexual issue. There was never a vote to remove him and the APA today will not confirm such a statement. Go ahead and call them. As for the other statements, they are about politics, not science. The Nebraska P.A., for example, has been taken over by those sympathetic to the homosexual movement and therefore oppose Cameron’s research but I have yet to see anyone take Cameron on in terms of his methodology. All I ever see is statements from political activists posing as scientists claiming Cameron’s work is blah, blah, blah, but they never seem to be able to refute his conclusions. Which is why he continues to publish his work in peer-reviewed scientific journals all over the world.

          • Kyle

            Cameron says that he resigned his membership from the APA, but like with all professional organizations, you cannot resign when you are under investigation. He lied, which is of course nothing new for him but there you have it.

            By the way the letter that they sent him in 1983 expelling him from the APA is freely available online for all to see.

            psychology [dot] ucdavis [dot] edu/faculty_sites/rainbow/assets/images/cameron_APA_letter [dot] jpg

          • charter123

            Well, regarding the APA expelling Cameron, you are wrong Kyle. That letter was apparently unauthorized by the APA and was sent out by some over-zealous staff member. There was never a vote to remove Cameron from any professional association. It never happened. I looked into this when I was a state legislator when I was vetting Dr. Cameron. I called Pam Willenz (APA’s director of Pulbic Affairs) and demanded that they confirm that Dr. Cameron was expelled and they refused to. Several authors have also asked the APA to confirm the letter you mention and they will not do so. Go ahead and call them and you will see for yourself. Moreover, Cameron resigned from the APA 13 months before (I have seen his resignation letter) the letter you mentioned. Regarding Hooker, there aren’t any long-term studies that show that the homosexual lifestyle is normal and the APA has been unable to come up with any such research. To determine if homosexuals are far different than heterosexuals regarding sexual abuse, alcoholism, mental breakdowns, drugs crime, etc., you have to follow hundreds of homosexuals over a long period of time or the study simply isn’t solid. As I’ve already stated, there AREN’T any long-term studies of homosexual lifestyles showing them to be the same as heterosexuals in these lifestyle categories, and that is solid proof that the homosexual lifestyle is not normal by any standard. I haven’t said anything in my piece that I can’t back up. I’m done with you Kyle; time to move on.

          • Dan

            Hooker’s research has been replicated including using a variety of research methods. Additional research before her and after her, has also shown that while many gay people experience the same problems straight people experience, but in elevated numbers, that does not mean all gay people experience those problems. This is why every mainstream medical and mental health organization on the country today, agree being gay is a normal expression of human love and bonding for a minority of the population.

          • Gowdy_The_Pinhead

            When are you going to tell us all about the day you chose to be straight?

          • DrMaxHathaway

            Actually, it was worse than merely stacking committees.

            Homosexual activists actually took over the annual APA conference in Washington DC and locked the membership inside the building.

            They stole the official letterhead of the committee on Sexual Deviance and forged documents using the stolen letterhead instructing the general membership that this committee was recommending the removal of ego-syntonic homosexuality from the DSM.

            Then homosexual activists blocked members of the committee on Sexual Deviance from speaking and delivering their planned address.
            Then, in the environment of scientific and professional fascism crated by these acts of aggression, they forced a vote of the membership on removing Homosexuality from the DSM.
            I believe this was documented by a number of sources, one being one of the Experts on the Sexual Deviance Committee, Ruth Tiffany Barnhouse.

          • Dan

            It is irrational to believe 30 activists could force the APA to remove the diagnosis if not based on the research. 1973 was still a very anti-gay period of our history, and being gay could even get you locked up in several states. While pressuere was needed to get them to act, the vote was based on the science, not the political pressure of the time.

            Ironically, it was added in 1950, based on the popular prejudice of the anti-gay McCarthy era, despite the evidence already showing it was not a disorder. Removal in 1973, was based on the evidence, and today every science based medical and mental health organization in the country agree being gay is not a disorder, but a normal form of human love and bonding for a minority of the population.

        • Gowdy_The_Pinhead

          LOL. You ARE uneducated rubes!

      • Dan

        Every science based medical and mental health organization in the country today, recognize being gay is a natural expression of human love and bonding for a minority of the population.

    • Kyle

      Em, wrong! the American Psychiatric Association or APA produces the DSM, not the American Psychological Association or the nonexistent American Psychiatrist Association.

    • DrMaxHathaway

      You are completely mistaken:

      Psychologists do not create or publish the DSM. It is the marketing tool of psychiatrists.

      Psychologists provide some of the research that is sometimes cited as a basis for DSM diagnostic labels.

      Today, because of the infiltration of the professions by Marxists, homosexuals, Pedophiles, and other miscreants, the DSM is a worthless piece of politically garbage.

  • ricky

    Kelly, Smith, O’Reilly are NOT conservatives!!

  • aCultureWarrior

    Since the decriminalization of homosexuality, the NLGJA (National Lesbian Gay Journalist Association) is only one area where the homosexual movement is showing it’s muscle.

  • Pingback: THE GAY AGENDA: WHY YOU NEED TO BE CONCERNED AS A CHRISTIAN | thepropheticnews

  • Pingback: Homosexual ‘rights’: Suicide for humanity?

  • Mr. . . John Lutz

    Good job!!! I have been…, with God’s help battering fox news for some time nowww!!! I was able to get the FAGGOT commentors off of the kellyfile by pointing ‘out’ the wearing of the ‘purple’!!! Go to my twitter account at Fedup7777 and see the over 9000 tweets!!!

  • Tom Johnson

    Steve, could you please share your personal story of when you chose to be a heterosexual? I think it would be extremely inspiring for you to tell us about how you found a man sexually attractive, just as much as you find a woman sexually attractive, but decided to be heterosexual. I mean, as you so eloquently stated, you’re not born that way. So you had to make a choice. Please share with us!

    Was it a one-time choice, or something that you have to do everyday? Do tell us, please.

    This simple question proves the buffoonery of your analysis. What I do suggest, is that you find a good shrink and analyze the root of your rage, hate and fear of gays. While you’re at it, you might actually read the 5th and 14th amendment, and explain what rational argument you have to deny gays their civil liberties (always remembering, even though I am a very strong Christian, even I know that faith is not rational

  • whatdidhesay

    This is very enjoyable. Some fringe bigot who posts statistics from 25 years ago being dragged kicking and screaming into the 21st century, upset that his news network of choice isn’t bigoted enough for him. At least he has this lone outpost on the internet to share his hatred with a few likeminded fanatics, but soon he won’t even have this. You guys are all going the way of the troglodyte. Deal with it.

  • Glen

    It’s over.

    You lose.

    You just wasted A LOT of your time writing that diatribe. It’s nothing that hasn’t been heard a million times and deftly shot down by reality, decency, goodness, fairness, American law and values.

  • P.

    It’s funny to see the anti-gay crowd now decrying Fox for not being anti-gay ENOUGH! Even though they regularly host hate-group leader Tony Perkins, ignore stories of LGBT violence and, recently, even brought in a psychiatrist to assert that the UCSB killings were somehow related to homosexuality, they’re somehow PRO-gay. They’re much more on your side than ours, Steven. Just because they won’t regurgitate the most vile of lies, accusations, and defamations that Barber and his ilk would like to use to deprive us of every right we have (though there would be a LOT of work to undo the gains we’ve made to becoming truly equal under the law), doesn’t mean that we’re bosom buddies. Every time I hear about BarbWire I just think that barbed wire fences kept the imprisoned gays in their concentration camps until they were executed. I’m sure Matt Barber wishes we were back in those days.

  • Cristina4Jesus

    Amazing article, I think you covered it all. Wish everyone in America, especially all the Christians could read it. May we all get active against the homosexual agenda before they start jailing Christians.

  • Jim

    Yup. The Great Gay Agenda is about to take over the USofA. Better get used to it, straights. You’ll be our slaves. We’ll force you to bake cakes for us and take our pictures. It will be Gay Pride 24×7. Gay Pride 365 days each year and an extra day of Gay Pride every leap year. You’ll wish you were in purgatory, straights. How you’ll suffer! Big Gay Brother will be watching you, so you’d better be nice–or else.

  • PoliticalGirl50

    i’m starting to think that the anti-gay people on this site, actually have a sickness which causes them to obsess over gay people’s behavior. remember according to you all, we are 4-6(%) out of 100 that are gay (some may say less), and we all come from straight parents, siblings, co-workers, attend church, and have children, who we love/they love dearly.

    Here is a couple of things I would like to add. Even though we may only be under 10%, we have a large circle of people who support us. Now we are in the 70-80% who know that we are good people because they are living life with us. Not the monsters that you try to make us out to be. Most of the things you listed above….they support.

    Thank God for Megyn, Bill, Glenn Beck, etc. etc., who all have multiple family and friends who are also in a gay lifestyle and understanding that you guys and girls here are actually becoming freaks because of your paranoia that “gays” are out to get you.

    The saddest part I see is that as you are supposedly trying to defend Christianity, you are actually destroying it. You are making yourselves into the new Fred Phelps of the country. Luckily most discerning folks know the difference.

    And also, note to the writer. What is new in the above post that you wrote, You have added nothing new to the conversation that hasn’t been written over and over by others. What are your goals of writing this? Do you want people to hate other gays? Do you want to convert gays to straights? What is the point of this, besides hurting others?

  • ZnSD

    The only straight men obsessed with gayness aren’t really straight at all. Fact. Your magical sky friend and book of re translated bs mean nothing.

    • RJLigier

      ROFLMAO……….the consensus of the borderline psychotic within the APAs is not fact…………………ROFLMAO

  • Pingback: My Website | Why Are Media Conservatives Buying the Homossexual Propaganda?

EmailTitle2

Sign up for BarbWire alerts!


EmailTitle2

Sign up for BarbWire alerts!