Sheer Evil: Feminist Author’s Vile Views on Abortion
Daily Beast contributor Amanda Marcotte intensely despises pro-lifers. In a two-part profanity-laced tirade, posted on March 14 and 17 on Raw Story, this morally-impaired feminist writer pounced on pro-lifers as “consummate liars,” “anti-choice kooks” with “half-baked quackery” and “sh*t arguments.”
Marcotte’s monstrous, bone-chilling statements get much worse:
Either way, what she [the woman] wants trumps the non-existent desires of a mindless pre-person that is so small it can be removed in about two minutes during an outpatient procedure. Your cavities fight harder to stay in place.
I don’t particularly like babies. They are loud and smelly and, above all other things, demanding. No matter how much free day care you throw at women, babies are still time-sucking monsters with their constant neediness.
Here are Marcotte’s depraved thoughts on adoption: “Adoption? F**k you, seriously. I am not turning my body over for nine months of gaining weight and puking and being tired and suffering and not being able to sleep on my side and going to the hospital for a bout of misery and pain so that some couple I don’t know and probably don’t even like can have a baby. I don’t owe that couple a free couch to sleep on while they come to my city to check out the local orphans, so I sure as sh*t don’t owe them my body.” With “reasonable” arguments like that, it’s easy to see the darkness that resides in her heart and at the core of the death-loving, pro-abortion baby butchers.
Marcotte saved some of her best vitriol for conservatives in her equally jaw-dropping March 17th follow-up piece:
“Frankly, the more traditional, conservative argument against abortion—no, they’re not going to lift a finger to help you with your unwanted baby and you should have thought about that before f**king, you stupid slut who deserves to suffer—at least has the refreshing scent of honesty to it.”
Marcotte is so extreme in her views that she considers fellow pro-abortion zealot Wendy Davis’ opportunistic, election-year “support” of Texas’ 20-week abortion ban as “a betrayal.”
Marcotte is the same fanatical infanticide proponent who earlier voiced her support for California’s 2013 law which removed the restriction requiring abortions to be performed by surgeons. The legislation allowed midwives, nurse practitioners, or physician assistants to perform first-trimester abortions after merely completing a training course. Marcotte blasted what she characterized as the “widespread but utterly false belief that abortion is an intense and dangerous surgery.” Furthermore, according to Marcotte, an individual doesn’t need to be a surgeon to rip apart a baby with a vacuum because early abortions are a “relatively minor medical procedure that hardly merits the term ‘surgery.’” Apparently, she only cares about “legal” abortions for any reason at any stage of the pregnancy — you can forget the whole 1996 Clinton-inspired “safe” and “rare” fraud.
Last year, Marcotte also identified the NRA as the “domestic abuse lobby.” Baby dismemberment, on the other hand, is just fine and dandy. Sheer evil.
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse. Read More