bash back

Homosexual Hijackers: The Hypersexualization of Cultural Hostages

avatar
Print Friendly and PDF

When the celebration of a godly Catholic Saint becomes a flashpoint for the homosexual agenda, it’s just another sure sign that things have really spiraled out of control in America. How is it that the St. Patrick’s Day parades in Boston and New York have become the latest pawn in the homosexual hijacking of this country?

In the current cultural clash between morality and decadence, apparently nothing is considered sacred or beyond the tainting touch of the “gay lobby.”

As the militant homosexual activists aggressively sweep through our society in their hostage-taking enterprise, they trample on religious rights — and numerous other freedoms — leaving only debauchery in their wake. Through their shameless “gay” gangland style thuggery, they defile and hypersexualize everything that they come into contact with. And the “Big Beer” brouhaha is just their latest attempt to distort a holiday observance, which is supposed to be about commemorating a heroic, holy man, into more perversity on parade. The homosexual wrecking ball has “come out” in full vengeance mode with corporate sponsors, professional sports organizations, elected officials, mainstream media outlets, Hollywood celebrities, and universities all drooling and panting to be the first to ride the “gay” bandwagon on its path to perdition.  

Is it any wonder that the Catholic Church doesn’t want to sully their Saint with the raunchy displays that are typically seen in the annual “gay pride” parades held across America? Why would the organizers want to see homosexuals prancing around in drag, genitalia-revealing clothing, or nearly naked?

And what’s the likelihood that “gay pride” organizers would ever allow Christians to march in their parades and pass out biblical literature about the sinfulness of homosexuality? Or what’s the chance that they would welcome groups such as NOM (National Organization for Marriage), NARTH (National Association for Research and Therapy of Homosexuality) or JONAH (Jews Offering New Alternatives to Homosexuality) to march right alongside the transvestites? Or what about an ex-gay marching band or Mark Regnerus as the grand marshal? Not on your life! The simple fact is that homosexual events are not “open” to everyone. Certain individuals and organizations, that don’t conform to their ideology, are absolutely barred from participating in their parades. Of course, they wouldn’t want any religious or moral principles “raining on their parade.” Homosexual extremists march along a one-way street when it comes to so-called “tolerance.”

At “gay pride” events and parades in places such as San Francisco, Atlanta, Charlotte, and New Orleans, it is not uncommon to see drag queens, phalluses, public nudity, actual and simulated sex acts, offensive signs/music, pornographic images, NAMBLA (pedophilia) representatives, S&M paraphernalia, and public spankings to raise money for AIDS efforts. So, why would the Catholic Church – and any morally sane individual – want to associate St. Patrick with those kinds of debauched displays?

In some places, the homosexual hijackers’ reign of terror is basically complete. For instance, in San Francisco, public decency ordinances are consistently and systematically overlooked during their homosexual, perversity-promoting events. Nudity and public sex acts are the norm during the annual Folsom Street Fair and other “gay pride” parades and festivals held in the city. Police officers, on foot and bicycle, congregate nearby and observe, making no attempt to enforce the law for fear of being labeled homophobic or worse.

And where is the mainstream media while all of this crude and vulgar behavior is so blatantly on display? They’re engaged in a homosexual-friendly, collaborative cover-up via a media blackout because they know that these sex-crazed, pornified sin-fests don’t fit the nice, neat little narrative of the happy, “normal gay family” that’s just minding their own business in relative suburban obscurity. Although not all homosexuals are militantly involved in the hostile takeover of the American culture, we can’t ignore the intimidating and morally corrosive efforts of the aggressive “gay” activists.

In advance of the September 15, 2013 “gay pride” parade in Dallas, Texas, the city officials made it clear that they had had enough of this type of outrageous behavior. They pledged to crack down on the lewdness and nudity that had become widespread at their annual gay pride parade. While past marches had featured bare-breasted women and men in tight, wet underwear with visible genitalia, Dallas law enforcement said the city would no longer turn a blind eye to such violations of city and state law. The rules now state: “In accordance with the city of Dallas public nudity ordinance, parade participants must not expose genitalia, buttocks, or female breasts.” Additionally, the new parade restrictions prohibit other vile exhibitions: “In accordance with state of Texas obscenity law, sexual paraphernalia, real or simulated sex acts and genital or phallic representations are prohibited from the parade.” City officials, along with the event’s organizers, said they wanted the pride event to be more “family friendly.”

The reaction, however, from the “gay” community and activists to this policy change was quite eye-opening. It shockingly revealed the true darkness that lurks at the heart of America’s homosexual movement. They expressed great outraged at the newly-implemented common sense changes. On the social media website Twitter, incensed homosexuals vowed to wear  – or not wear – whatever they wanted to the pride parade. Activist Daniel Cates wrote on his Facebook page, “The ‘queer’ is effectively being erased from our Pride celebration in favor of the most polished, heteronormative representation of our community as possible. It should be noted that the rioters at the Stonewall Inn fought to break OUT of the d*mn closet! Our movement was built of sex positivity and our desire to BE WHO WE ARE! I urge you ALL to openly DEFY the Tavern Guild!” (Evidently, the word “restraint” is nowhere to be found in the homosexual dictionary.)

Based on Mr. Cates’ own words, here are a just a few thoughts:

If they “can’t be themselves” without being mostly naked, raunchy, and highly sexualized, doesn’t that contradict the whole “It’s not about sex, it’s about love” mantra? It sounds much more to me like a crotch-centric fixation than anything to do with love. 

If they’re so adamantly against “heteronormative” behavior, then why are homosexual activists also fighting so hard to get “married?” Marriage, after all, is the most heteronormative institution there is! There is obviously no method to their madness.

And homosexuals claim that they want equal treatment under the law, but as soon as they are told that they will be treated like any other citizen who breaks public decency laws, they throw a hissy fit. Apparently, they don’t really want equal treatment; what they demand is special treatment. They think that they are entitled to some sort of “protected class,” above-the-law status that allows them to brazenly break the law with impunity, and sadly, in most places and in many ways, that’s exactly what were witnessing as public officials cower in fear and cave to their every terrorist-like tactic!

Therefore, the “coexist” meme is a falsehood of epic proportions; it’s really “Leftist code” for the legal authorization of the anti-Christian forces – of which the virulent homosexual hijackers have become the worst offenders – to run roughshod over anyone with whom they disagree. In their twisted idea of coexistence, Christians and conservatives must live under the heel of the homofascists.

What the St. Patrick’s Day Parade organizers and every other religious group, cultural edifice or icon of morality need to do is implement a “we don’t negotiate with ‘queer’ terrorists” policy. Or else all will be lost to the homosexual hijackers.

Print Friendly and PDF



Posting Policy

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse. Read More

comments

  • thisoldspouse

    Don’t even try to understand the incoherent mindset of the homosexual, Mr. Allen. They will try to insist that circles have four corners and four equal sides and call you a bigot if you disagree, all the while driving cars with nothing other than circular wheels.

    • vorpal

      Assuming that ALL homosexuals are somehow lacking in mental faculties and are incoherent speaks less badly about them than it does about you, thisoldspouse.

  • Tom

    Could you cite a recent example of a NAMBLA representative marching in Pride?

    • thisoldspouse

      All of them.

      • Tom

        How many Pride parades have you attended? Do you have the attendance list of floats with NAMBLA listed? How about photos? What evidence is there for your assertion?

        • thisoldspouse

          The militant homosexual “rights” movement is firmly ROOTED in pedophilia (look up Harry Hay for starters.) Just because there is not an explicit connection doesn’t mean that the connection doesn’t exist.

          • Guest

            Nope. That would be the Catholic Church.

          • thisoldspouse

            Distraction is such a childish display, but have at it.

          • Tom

            The accusation was that the attendance of NAMBLA representatives at Pride parades was ‘not uncommon’. There are many Pride parades every year in the USA. From the start of this millennium, do you have any evidence that NAMBLA has been in attendance at say, 25% of parades? As far as I am aware, H Hay hasn’t been attending many parades since his death in 2002, and even before then he wasn’t a representative of them.

          • RhondaStar

            I don’t recall this article giving any percentages…just an overview of what to expect.

            Moreover, is this your only disagreement with the article? Do you agree with all of the other perversion represented at these events? Do you deny what happened in Dallas?

          • Tom

            It said ‘not uncommon'; I take that to mean ‘common’. If so, evidence of participation in several of the large number of Pride parades in the USA so far in the millennium should be easy. At least the evidence that leads him to make that assertion would be useful to have, if only to draw attention to NAMBLA’s attendance and get them kicked out.

            I don’t know what happened in Dallas. I would imagine that there were men and women walking around with not many clothes on. Provided that the attire met the standards of what could be expected in a swimming pool, I don’t see the fuss. Personally, I would consider bear breasts in public less offensive than swastika flags, and yet those are protected by the First Amendment. Is strange to me that a symbol representing the murder of millions of people is protected on the basis of self-expression and free speech, and female breasts are considered obscene.

          • RhondaStar

            What’s “not uncommon” was the ENTIRE list of things that was provided in the article. There were no implied percentages or any statements about which ones were more common. Obviously, there will be differences in the number of phalluses, bare breasted women, transvestites, etc.

          • Tom

            If someone said to me, “It is not uncommon to see on farms ducks, hens, cows, horses and sheep”, I would expect to visit a fair proportion of farms where each of those things could be seen. Sometimes the farms would be cattle only farms, others horse only. However, the phrase “not uncommon” implies that there is a reasonable expectation that on visiting a farm, you are likely to see the things listed, even if no statistical proportions are given. If someone said, “It is not uncommon to see on farms, ducks, hens, cows, horses, sheep and rhinos”, I would expect evidence that rhinos on farms warranted inclusion in that list. In the same way, if someone says that it is not uncommon to see representatives of NAMBLA at Pride parades, I would assume it would be easy to provide evidence of that claim. No such evidence has been provided. I repeat: do you have evidence for the attendance of NAMBLA representatives at a number of Pride parades to warrant the term “not uncommon”.

          • RhondaStar

            It never said there are “equal” numbers of NAMBLA representatives and bare breast.

            And the fact that you have no problem with public displays of nudity where unsuspecting tourists might inadvertently bring their children, says all we need to know about the declining morals in this country.

          • Tom

            I never said there was. I chose the figure of 25% as it seemed like a reasonable number to describe as “not uncommon”. I was requesting any evidence in support of the assertion that NAMBLA representatives at Pride parades was not uncommon. The evidence I was expecting would be official attendance lists of parade marchers, photographs showing NAMBLA representatives. Do you have any evidence to suggest that the attendance of NAMBLA representatives is “not uncommon”?

          • Tom

            I am not American, nor do I live in America.

            Would you prefer to expose your children to a neo-Nazi march, or to a woman’s naked breasts?

          • Mike Callor

            But it said that it was “not uncommon”, thus it is reasonable to ask just how many of the hundreds of pride parades across the United States in the past 25 years have had known NAMBLA representatives march… Parhaps you could name just one?

          • vorpal

            Yes, because children seeing a pair of bare breasts – incidentally, one of the FIRST things that they interact with in their lives – is going to somehow damage them.

            Get a grip.

          • David

            bear breasts in public probably don’t offend the majority of people, bare breasts on the other hand are a different story :)

          • HP McLovincraft

            because facts are anathema here, duh

          • Bj Lincoln

            More straight Catholics have had sex with kids than gays.

          • thisoldspouse

            Incorrect. The Catholics who have sex with kids are homosexuals.

          • John

            Nope. Just pedophiles..

          • Janet Gerl

            thisoldspouse…………………a little piece of information…….YOUR WRONG!!!!

    • Guest

      Bill Pedophile Protector Donohue of The Catholic Pedophiles – I mean League

      • Guest

        Oh wait, no that was the St Patrick’s Day Parade.

    • HP McLovincraft

      of course they can’t. facts are anathema here.

  • goodasyou

    Thank you for yet another column that will help LGBT rights win even faster than they would’ve otherwise.

    The anti-LGBT movement’s biggest problem: Those who hurt the movement the most are the most eager to speak.

    • RhondaStar

      I’m not sure how informing people about the raunchy displays at “gay” pride events will help your cause. Most people just think it’s about poor, innocent gay people minding their own business, but this reveals the true underbelly and insidious intent of the homosexual movement. It’s pure perversion!

      • Guest

        Nope. Grow up you ignorant, mentally diseased, Nazi parasite

        • RhondaStar

          You need to read the Posting Policy before you’re banned from the site.

          By the way, it was the Nazi’s who used the term “parasite” when they talked about the Jews. And now you’re doing the same thing. Your fascist forefather’s would be most proud!

          • Guest

            Freedom of speech.

            It was the Nazis who arrested and killed gay people. Heinrich Himmler created the Reich Central Office for the Combatting of Homosexuality. He was a blood thirsty parasite and so are you. Your facist forefather would be proud of you and you will meet the same fate as he did you disgusting Nazi parasite whore,

      • Janet Gerl

        Oh really…..heterosexuals would never, ever parade around nearly nude would they….ha, ha, there’s all kinds in every group. Get over it!!

  • billJohnson19D

    Let’s be clear about something St. Patrick’s Day parades have absolutely no right to corporate sponsorship from any of these corporations. If granting corporate sponsorship would violate a corporation’s business principles or values then they are completely free to without their sponsorship. That is exactly what happened here, it isn’t hijacking or any of the other over the top language the author decided to use.

    Also NOM opposes gay rights which is why they would not be in a pride parade while on the other hand a gay Irish group does not oppose St. Patrick’s day and so there is no reason to deny them access to march in the parade.

  • Guest

    Nope. The St. Patrick’s Day Parade is about celebrating being Irish. Leprechauns are pagan and there is plenty of that at the parade. Shamrocks and 4 leaf clovers are pagan and there is plenty of that at the parade. The St. Patrick’s Day parade in Dublin, Ireland allows half naked samba dancers.

    Waving a rainbow flag and wearing t-shirts/ displaying a banner that says “Irish and Gay” is not “hyper sexualized” it is not sexualized at all. Only uneducated anti-gay barbarians think that because all you do is think about sex.

    As for all the “Big Beer brouhaha”; Ephesians 5:18. Proverbs 20:1, Proverbs 23:20-21, Isaiah 5:11, Leviticus 10:9, Romans 14:21, Galatians 5: 21, 1 Corinthians 6:10 says drinking alcohol is an “abomination” – a “sin” against “God”. Drunkards will not inherit the Kingdom of Heaven. Catholics/Christians are not allowed to drink beer according to “God”. Oh that’s right, reich-wing anti-gay “Catholics/Christians” are allowed to pick and choose which of “God’s” so called “word” or “laws” they will adhere to but everybody else must and will adhere to all of it even if they do not subscribe to that religion which is their first amendment right to do in ALL aspects of life.

    Grow up you grotesque, Nazi fascist,parasite. Heinrich Himmler would be proud of you and you will meet the same fate as him.

    • RhondaStar

      We all know who the true Nazi’s are. Homofascist!

      Bible forbids drunkenness, not drinking.

      • Guest

        Nope. You are the true Nazis and you WILL hang for it if you don’t back off.

        • RhondaStar

          Nice talking to ya…bye. You’re about to be banned from the site.

      • Guest

        Nazi whore

      • Guest

        Heterosexual couple have public sex at the St Patricks’s Day Parade.

        • RhondaStar

          And the police are looking for them…unlike the lawless homosexuals.

          • Guest

            LOL. Dumb Nazi whore.

          • thisoldspouse

            True. At the Folsom Street public sodomite orgy, the police stand around and watch.

          • Guest

            The Folsom Street is for S&M, which includes heterosexuals you uneducated Nazi trash.

          • Mike Callor

            Like they do during spring break and Mardi Gras?

          • HP McLovincraft

            you sound super duper jealous

          • vorpal

            Which homosexuals are the lawless ones? How can you tell?

      • Janet Gerl

        The bible? Oh that book of “stories” “fables” that is always being quoted and misinterpreted. Most of it written 50 to 100 years after Jesus died. Yes, stories do get exaggerated and fabricated with time don’t they. the bible is a perfect example. And then people like you hang on to every word/letter of it and pass judgement on everyone else who doesn’t.

        • RhondaStar

          50 – 100 years is closer than any other figure from antiquity. So, unless you’re prepared to throw out all of history, you better rethink that statement.

          Besides, the vast majority of scholars believe in the existence of the historical Jesus…regardless of whether they are believers or not.

          • Janet Gerl

            Vast majority of scholars…..doesn’t make them right. And judging from your posts, I doubt you read much of anything from opposing views. and in that case, your viewpoint is tainted/biased.

          • MC

            Can you prove that the vast majority of scholars, both atheist and theist, are wrong? I doubt you read any scholarly books on the subject, opposing views so in that case your viewpoint is tainted/biased.

          • Mike Callor

            The fact that it was written 50 to 100 years doesn’t make any of it true…

          • vorpal

            You said: “50 – 100 years is closer than any other figure from antiquity.”

            Where do you get this supposed “fact”? Many important “figures from antiquity” actually directly authored their own religious texts, so no, you are wrong.

  • Bj Lincoln

    Did you ever wonder why so many companies, media and people are OK with gay people? Because they don’t look at us an instantly think about what we do in the bedroom. You think about gay sex more than gay people! It’s no wonder you are angry and frustrated all the time. We are not hijackers or terrorists or any of the other colorful names you call us. I am your average taxpaying educated American who happens to be married to another woman. I don’t hide this fact but it is NOT to throw it in someones face. I talk about her and our home the same way you do. If you choose to think about what we do in private, you have a problem, not us.

    • RhondaStar

      When you prance around naked or nearly naked saying “look at me!,” “look at me!” We can’t help but think about how perverted many gays are.

      • Mike Callor

        Kinda like the way that straight people do during spring break and Mardi gras. Every. Single. Year?

        • RhondaStar

          And they don’t get any special treatment from the police!

          • Mike Callor

            Have you been to spring break or mardi gras recently? Of course they get special treatment from the police! Police officers take part in the celebrations!

          • RhondaStar

            I have a college age daughter that just got back from Panama City Beach. Guess what her “special” treatment was? When she and her friends arrived in Florida and the hotel found out that they were under 25, they were not allowed to stay there…even though they had already paid.

            However, had she been waving a rainbow flag, they probably would have thrown out the red carpet along with a ticker tape parade.

          • rcdcr

            Bitter, party of one?

          • Mike Callor

            And what about the hundreds of other hotels and motels that offer special prices for college students on spring break and turn a blind eye to rooms filled to double and triple capacity?

          • RhondaStar

            That didn’t happen to my daughter.

            Besides, all of your attempts to justify bad behavior by pointing to other bad behavior are failing miserably.

          • Mike Callor

            Are you denying that it is the case? Are you denying that hundreds of hotels and motels offer special treatment to spring breakers? That male police officers go around collecting beads from college aged girls?

            Please stop trying to distract from the point.

          • HP McLovincraft

            because you are making that up to justify your bigotry.

            prove it. put up or shut up.

          • LouiseCA

            It’s okay for you to scream for special rights but not for her to ask for fairness for her daughter? And standing for traditional values is now bigotry?

          • HP McLovincraft

            you shouldn’t take anecdotal evidence on the internets at face value.
            see: critical thinking

            see: put up or shut up

          • vorpal

            Your attempts to label something as bad behaviour and injustice by pointing to rare examples of narratives that don’t fall in line with them are failing miserably.

            The only thing you are a victim of is laughter at the transparent, self-righteous pity party you’ve erected in your own honour.

          • HP McLovincraft

            boohoo.

            anecdotal fail

          • LouiseCA

            And it’s equally wrong.
            What kind of rationalization is this..trying to justify one evil by holding up another? They are both equally wrong.

          • vorpal

            Rhonda, as much as you delight in trying to paint yourself as some kind of victim of some sort of homosexual terror-supremacy oppression, give it a rest, kitten. It isn’t becoming of you.

        • LouiseCA

          So what makes you think we are condoning that? They are equally perverted and troubled.

          • Mike Callor

            What’s good for the goose, I don’t see Christian screaming down Mardi Gras or Spring Break, yet every year they’re at pride events shouting themselves bluefaced at gays and lesbians, their children, their friends and their family members…

          • vorpal

            Precisely. Right-wing Christians embrace every chance they can to label themselves as anti-gay bigoted histrionic hypocrites.

      • Janet Gerl

        Watched any heterosexual main stream media movies lately??? Come on……get over your homophobia. I’m a heterosexual and really, Jeff Allen, you are so stuck in religion and discrimination you can’t see reality.

        • LouiseCA

          No. You are so blinded by lust that you’re no longer in touch with reality.
          There is no such thing as homophobia.

          • vorpal

            Homophobia = fear of OR aversion to homosexuals / homosexuality.
            Yes. It exists. It’s not a difficult concept to grasp. Perhaps you did not know that the suffix ~phobia does not exclusively mean “fear of” but also means “aversion to”?

      • HP McLovincraft

        Alternately, you could not look.

        • LouiseCA

          Find another hobby.

          • HP McLovincraft

            I like this hobby.

      • Mike C

        Exactly. At least straight people know how to act at parades.

        • MC

          Why do you keep posting pictures of atheists pissing and having sex in public? Is this what you get off on?

    • RhondaStar

      Gay Pride parades are not done in “private.”

      • HP McLovincraft

        Parades are scary!

        • vorpal

          It’s not difficult to avoid a gay pride parade. They occupy a grand total of several city blocks for a few hours each year.

          Mardi Gras is no less scary.

    • MC

      One doesn’t have to think about what homosexuals do in their rooms or out in the open in parks, all one has to do is look at the CDC report on the majority of HIV/AIDS cases are the male homosexual community. 13-24 year olds being the most affected age group. The question is, why are adult male homosexuals having sex with 13-17 year old boys and giving them HIV/AIDS? Facts don’t lie.

      • Halou

        If a HIV+ woman gives birth to a child, or a HIV+ man gets a woman pregnant, there is a risk that any child will be HIV+ as well.
        Aside from that, sex is not the only way to spread an infection, blood transfusions, or drug users who share needles. HIV can come from any body fluid.

        • MC

          Yes, I know how HIV/AIDS is spread but the CDC report is talking about 13-24 year old gay males.

      • Mike Callor

        And one need look no further than the same CDC to find that only 4% of the entire U.S. LGBT community are HIV+ [1], so the question becomes why are you trying to attribute to entire homosexual community a disease that the vast majority of gay people will never contract?

        As far as your question is concerned, what makes you think that if MSM 13-17 year olds are the “most affected age group”, that they are not being infected by other 13-17 year olds?

        [1] CDC HIV M&M Report – September 2010 – Addendum IV.

        • MC

          You should try reading for comprehension, nowhere in the CDC report does it say “4% of the entire LGBT community is HIV/AIDS positive”, it says that 4% of the MALE population is gay, and out of the 4%, 78% accounted for new HIV infections. And they made up 63% of ALL new infections, that includes straight men, straight women, lesbian women, and drug attics. And gay males made up 52% of ALL PEOPLE living with HIV infection in 2009 alone. That includes straight men, straight women, lesbian women, and drug addicts and people who got it through transfusions etc. It’s gay people like you who have no idea what they’re talking about when it comes to HIV/AIDS, and spread the disease out of ignorance, especially when you say, “the vast majority of gay people will never contract the disease”, when the CDC refutes your claim and gay magazines like the advocate call it an epidemic in the gay male community.

        • LouiseCA

          You are both sick. Aids was born and spread within the homosexual community. It is rife with it. And they are spreading it to everybody else. There’s something to really be proud of. Good Grief.

          • Mike Callor

            1) HIV was born out of a small group of Sub-Saharan bush meat hunters, it was then brought to the United States via Haiti by HETEROSEXUALS where it was then passed on to homosexuals.

            2) Worldwide HIV/AIDS is a disease primarily spread through heterosexual intercourse.

            3) 4% of all gay people in the U.S. is “rife”? According to what definition of that word?

          • vorpal

            Louise: You are entitled to your own opinions. You are not, however, entitled to your own FACTS. If you are going to speak factually, please spend one minute fact-checking beforehand to avoid sounding like an ignorant braying mule with brain damage.

      • Mike Callor

        Your reply to my comment isn’t showing up. Is there any way that you could re-post it so that I can respond?

        • Mike Callor

          To MC.

          1) What makes you think that I am gay?

          2) The statistics that you are citing seem to be confusing you;
          * Just because homosexual men account for the majority of new and existing cases of HIV infection does not mean that the majority of homosexual men are HIV+
          * In reality the opposite is true, the vast majority of homosexual men in the United States (about 89-91% or 95-96% of the entire homosexual community) are HIV- according to CDC figures
          [1]

          3) So the question remains, why are you blaming ALL homosexual men for spreading a disease that the vast majority of them will never have?

          [1] CDC HIV M&M Report – September 2010 – Addendum IV.

          • MC

            “In 2010, MSM (gay and bi-sexual men), accounted for 63% of estimated new HIV infections in the United States and 78% of infections among all newly infected men. From 2008 to 2010, new HIV infections increased 22% among young (aged 13-24) MSM and 12% among MSM overall.”

            “Gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (MSM))a represent approximately 2% of the United States population, yet are the population most severely affected by HIV. In 2010, young MSM (aged 13-24 years) accounted for 72% of new HIV infections among all persons aged 13 to 24, and 30% of new infections among all MSM. At the end of 2010, an estimated 489,121 (56%) persons living with an HIV diagnosis in the United States were MSM or MSM-IDU.”

            In 2011, in the United States, MSM, (gay and bi-sexual men), accounted for 79% of 38,825 estimated HIV diagnoses among all males aged 13 years and older and 62% of 49,273 estimated diagnoses among all persons receiving an HIV diagnosis that year.

            At the end of 2010, of the estimated 872,990 persons living with an HIV diagnosis, 440,408 (50%) were MSM. Forty-seven percent of MSM living with an HIV diagnosis were white, 31% were black/African American, and 19% were Hispanic/Latino.

            In 2011, MSM (gay and bi-sexual men), accounted for 52% of estimated AIDS diagnoses among all adults and adolescents in the United States. Of the estimated 16,694 AIDS diagnoses among MSM, 39% were in blacks/African Americans; 34% were in whites; and 23% were in Hispanics/Latinos.

            By the end of 2010, an estimated 302,148 MSM with an AIDS diagnosis had died in the United States since the beginning of the epidemic, representing 48% of all deaths of persons with an AIDS diagnosis.”

            http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/risk/gender/msm/facts/

          • MC
          • Mike Callor

            To MC,

            I am not sure why your comments are not being posted but I will continue to reply here.

            Again, just because the majority of new and existing cases of HIV are in homosexual men does not mean that the majority of homosexual men are HIV+.

            Look at it this way, say there are 2 groups of 20 people, the red group and the blue group. Now say that red group as 2 people who have condition A, while the blue group only has 1. Statistically speaking, the red group is now twice as likely to have condition A as the blue group, despite the fact that 18 out of 20 people in the red group do not have condition A, see how that works?

          • MC

            Check it out.

          • Mike Callor

            Again and I hate to have to belabor this point but just because the majority of new and existing cases of HIV are in
            homosexual and bisexual men does not mean that the majority of homosexual men are HIV+. the fact remains that only 4% of the entire homosexual community are HIV+ [1], so how are homosexuals responsible for a disease that the vast majority of them do not and will never have?

            [1] CDC HIV M&M Report – September 2010 – Addendum IV.

          • MC

            Dude, 53% of ALL people living with HIV are gay men. Homosexual men are 44-86 times more likely to be infected, were 44 to 86 times as likely to be diagnosed with HIV compared with other men, and 40 to 77 times as likely as women.” (Center for Disease Control, http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/topics/msm/index.htm)

            “19% of MSM [men sex with men] are infected with HIV; 44% unaware they are infected: “A recent CDC study found that in 2008 one in five (19%) MSM in 21 major US cities were infected with HIV, and nearly half (44%) were unaware of their infection.” (Center for Disease Control, cdc.gov/hiv/topics/msm/index.htm)”

            “MSM is 4% of population yet has HIV 44 time the rate of other men: While CDC estimates that MSM account for just 4 percent of the U.S. male population aged 13 and older, the rate of new HIV diagnoses among MSM in the U.S. is more than 44 times that of other men (range: 522–989 per 100,000 MSM vs. 12 per 100,000 other men). (cdc.gov/nchhstp/newsroom/docs/fastfacts-msm-final508comp.pdf)

            MSM group only group with increasing HIV infection rate: “MSM are the only risk group in the U.S. in which new HIV infections are increasing. While new infections have declined among both heterosexuals and injection drug users, the annual number of new HIV infections among MSM has been steadily increasing since the early 1990s.” (cdc.gov/nchhstp/newsroom/docs/fastfacts-msm-final508comp.pdf)”

            How you can just pretend there is no epidemic in the gay male community is beyond me.

          • Mike Callor

            nowhere in the CDC report does it say “4% of the entire LGBT community is HIV/AIDS positive

            Actually yes it does, according to the CDC, HIV prevalence among MSM (gay, bisexual males) is 9-11% or ~4%[1][2][3] of the entire gay community (gays, lesbians, bisexuals, transgender etc.)

            [1] CDC HIV M&M Report – September 2010 – Addendum IV
            [2] Fujie X, Sternberg M, Markowitz L. 2010
            [3] Marks G, Crepaz N, Janssen R 2006

          • MC

            Why don’t you put a clickable link to your evidence?

          • Mike Callor

            “Dude” you continue to misread or misrepresent the findings of the studies and reports that you are citing.

            From the CDC survey that found that 19% figure you cited;

            …these findings are limited to men who frequented MSM-identified venues (most of which were bars and dance clubs) during the survey period in 21 MSAs with high AIDS prevalence; the results are not representative of all MSM. A lower HIV prevalence has been reported among MSM in the general U.S. population

            – Emphasis mine.

            So again, how are homosexuals responsible for a disease that the vast majority of them do not and will never have?

            I just cited three studies one can be viewed online on the CDC’s website, access to the other two can be purchased for a nominal fee.

          • Mike Callor

            Please stop citing statistics that you don’t understand from studies that you clearly have not even read…

          • MC

            CDC: 62 percent of HIV-positive gay men have unprotected sex

            http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/dec/3/62-hiv-positive-gay-men-have-unprotected-sex-cdc/

            It’s you who doesn’t understand the studies, it’s you who doesn’t think there’s an epidemic.

          • MC
          • Mike Callor

            And HIV+ men make up only 4% of the entire gay community. Again, please stop citing statistics that you don’t understand from studies that you clearly have not even read…

          • MC

            “It is now well-understood that HIV does not only affect the gay community but can also infect anybody, regardless of sex, ethnicity, or sexual orientation.[6] However, the HIV virus still severely affects MSM across the globe. MSM are only a small percentage of the U.S. population, but they are consistently the population group most affected by the HIV/AIDS virus and are the largest proportion of American citizens with an AIDS diagnosis who have died.[7] The United Nations estimates that 2 to 20% of MSM are infected with HIV, depending on the region they live in.[8]”

            http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HIV_and_men_who_have_sex_with_men#cite_ref-data.unaids.org_8-1

          • Mike Callor

            According to the CDC, HIV prevalence among MSM (gay, bisexual males) is 9-11% or ~4%[1][2][3] of the entire gay community (gays, lesbians, bisexuals, transgender etc.)

            From the CDC in their own words with respect to the 1 in 5 or 19% figure;

            …these findings are limited to men who frequented MSM-identified venues (most of which were bars and dance clubs) during the survey period in 21 MSAs with high AIDS prevalence; the results are not representative of all MSM. A lower HIV prevalence has been reported among MSM in the general U.S. population

            -emphasis mine.

            [1] CDC HIV M&M Report – September 2010 – Addendum IV
            [2] Fujie X, Sternberg M, Markowitz L. 2010
            [3] Marks G, Crepaz N, Janssen R 2006

          • MC

            Sobering Statistics: HIV/AIDS and the LGBT Community

            HRC’s latest issue brief on the subject reports that, according to a recent CDC study in major U.S. cities, 1 in 5 young gay and bisexual men are infected with HIV – yet nearly half don’t even know it.
            http://www.hrc.org/blog/entry/sobering-statistics-hiv-aids-and-the-lgbt-community

          • Mike Callor

            Okay, so now you’re just regurgitating the same misrepresentations that I have already addressed, according to the CDC themselves, the 1 in 5 (19%) is not representative of all homosexuals, it’s not even representative of all homosexual men…

          • Mike Callor

            So now you’ve given up entirely on actually trying to read studies (good idea, given your apparent inability to actually read them correctly) and are instead relying on editorial reports? Oh, why am I not surprised?!

          • MC

            Ding dong, the editorial reports quote the CDC and the world health reports. It’s not my fault you hate the truth, why am I not surprised?

          • Mike Callor

            Yes and guess what? They also editorialized LOL! Again, like I have said over and over again, according to the CDC own accepted figures, 4%, not 19, not 63 but 4% of homosexuals in the United States are HIV+. Are you ever going to answer my question as to why all homosexuals ought to be responsible in your estimation for a disease that most of them will never contract?

            Truth? Oh please don’t make me laugh, you want to lecture me on truth when at the beginning of this conversation you didn’t even understand basic statistics?

          • MC

            Again, you don’t understand the studies. LOL! Are you really this obtuse or just play one on the internet to troll?
            I never said 63% of gay men have HIV/AIDS, the study shows that 63% of gay men make up the total of NEW HIV cases a year and 78% of infections among all newly infected men. From 2008 to 2010, new HIV infections increased 22% among young (aged 13-24) MSM and 12% among MSM overall.

            Do you really not know what “new HIV infections a year means”? It jumped up 22% in two years for young gay men and 12% among gay men overall. Those numbers are staggering and everyone, including the LGBT community calls it an epidemic except you because you are clearly ignorant. The studies also show that gay men only make up 2-4% of the male population.

            “The large number of MSM living with HIV means that, as a group, gay, bisexual, and other MSM have an increased chance of being exposed to HIV. Results of HIV testing conducted in 20 cities as part of the National HIV Behavioral Surveillance System indicated that 18% of MSM tested in 2011 were HIV-positive and that HIV prevalence increased with increasing age.”

            I also have a feeling you have no idea what “MSM” means, it means “men who have sex with men”.

            Let me post it again to help you out:

            “Gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (MSM))a represent approximately 2% of the United States population, yet are the population most severely affected by HIV. In 2010, young MSM (aged 13-24 years) accounted for 72% of new HIV infections among ALL persons aged 13 to 24, and 30% of new infections among all MSM. At the end of 2010, an estimated 489,121 (56%) persons living with an HIV diagnosis in the United States were MSM or MSM-IDU.”
            http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/risk/gender/msm/facts/

            Is this really that hard for you to understand? 56% of people living with HIV at the end of 2010 are gay and bi-sexual men. Let’s not forget about the fact that:
            “In 2012, 75% of the reported P&S syphilis cases were among men who have sex with men (MSM).”

            http://www.cdc.gov/std/syphilis/STDFact-MSM-Syphilis.htm

            Now again, please show me your evidence that says only 4% of ALL gay and bi-sexual MEN have HIV/AIDS? Please provide a clickable link to your evidence.

          • MC

            I’m still waiting on your evidence that only 4% of gay men are HIV positive.

          • MC

            You should try reading for comprehension, nowhere in the CDC report does it say “4% of the entire LGBT community is HIV/AIDS positive”, it says that 4% of the MALE population is gay, and out of the 4%, 78% accounted for new HIV infections. And they made up 63% of ALL new infections, that includes straight men, straight women, lesbian women, and drug attics. And gay males made up 52% of ALL PEOPLE living with HIV infection in 2009 alone. That includes straight men, straight women, lesbian women, and drug addicts and people who got it through transfusions etc. It’s gay people like you who have no idea what they’re talking about when it comes to HIV/AIDS, and spread the disease out of ignorance, especially when you say, “the vast majority of gay people will never contract the disease”, when the CDC refutes your claim and gay magazines like the advocate call it an epidemic in the gay male community.

            http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/statist

      • LouiseCA

        Stop your lying.

        • MC

          Prove I’m lying.

    • LouiseCA

      Well, not really.
      However no one is saying there are not homosexuals that mind their business such as you do. But many of them are obnoxious, loud, rude, crude, insensitive, selfish, and totally fixated on sex. Whether you want to admit it or not.
      One woman said on a major news media during a “pride” parade in a major US city that they intended to have “24 hour orgies” in the streets. Does that sound normal to you, seriously?

      • vorpal

        I don’t know where you get these bizarre ideas of homosexuals, but I’ve been a gay male for 36 years now, and I have never encounter these generalizations that you put forward, nor have I ever witnessed anyone ever claiming that they intended to have a “24 hour orgy”, privately or in public.

        Perhaps your should seriously consider the sources you use to obtain this “information”, since it sounds like little more than virulent anti-gay nonsense to me.

        Or, alternatively, perhaps the majority of gay people that you meet are obnoxious, rude, and insensitive towards you because your attitude about LGBT people, quite frankly, stinks and doesn’t elicit much respect? I can say that the majority of gay people that I have met have been warm, loving, kind, and respectful, respectable people.

        The right-wing Christians that I have met, on the other hand, seem to embrace every opportunity they can to portray how hateful, judgmental, fear-mongering, and bigoted they are.

  • DavVictor

    So much to comment on that we would both be writing books

    This nation lacks morals, hence the fact that gays can openly attack when the religious right is condemned for doing so. Media is packed with very creative people of which many in high positions are gay.

    Not a lot you can do when humanity has lost all sense of respect for one another and the courts begin to protect the immoral minority at the expense of the majority’s very same rights.

    • HP McLovincraft

      Gay attacks! Beware of glitter!

      • DavVictor

        Cough, Cough,,,, my eyes, my eyes, … cough cough…

  • Mike Callor

    Hey, bigotry just doesn’t pay like it used to! Corporate America spends a ton of money to find out exactly were public opinion lies, do any of you honestly think that big business would be “kowtowing” to the 1-2% of of the population that are homos if they didn’t already know that that particular minority had majority support? Gotta love that free market! If anyone needs an indication as to where public opinion is on all things gay, just take a look at the twitter response to the Arizona gay discrimination bill, it was 40-1 in favor of the homos… Time to face up to it anti-gays, you’ve lost big against the gays, you can bow out gracefully now and maintain some level of dignity or just keep screaming, shouting and playing right into their hands, the choice is yours…

    • DavVictor

      Better to be on side of what is good & right; at ANY cost.

      • Mike Callor

        Glad you agree!

        • RhondaStar

          We definitely don’t agree. We maintain our dignity by defending the truth and what is pure. There is NO dignity in practicing homosexual deviancy. None whatsoever!

          • Mike Callor

            Are you going to ban me now while at the same time ironically calling me the fascist? Yeah, gotta love all that dignity you’re showing in the face of dissenting opinion.

          • Janet Gerl

            Rhonda…….your just spewing forth what you’ve been taught (i.e. brainwashed) to believe. Had you not been “taught” this…..you would be an open minded, nonjudgmental person.

          • DavVictor

            That’s so funny.
            I take it you believe mankind is general good at heart. I’d kindly point you to history and the number of people killed in war.

            As for opinionated and judgmental, the mirror should point out your own faults in that regard; your own post is such.

            Christianity is not a tolerant religion. It was never meant to be and never will be. There is black and white and you’ve chosen your belief as we have chosen our own.

          • vorpal

            An activity has as much dignity as you give it. My 10 year marriage to my lovely homosexual husband is certainly dignified and something we treasure dearly.

        • DavVictor

          Typical poor form.
          I don’t agree.

          • Mike Callor

            You don’t agree with your own comment? Okay then…

          • DavVictor

            Like I said, You have poor form; can’t even act like an adult.

          • Mike Callor

            And name calling is good form now? Welcome to bizarro world I guess…

          • DavVictor

            What name did I use?
            Grow up.

          • Mike Callor

            And I quote;

            “can’t even act like an adult”

            So name calling and personal attacks are good form now?

          • DavVictor

            Wow, spin, spin, spin. You should be in public relations.
            Have a nice life.

          • Mike Callor

            Again, your own words Vic…

          • BillTheCat45

            I know right? You need to be polite and use proper grammar when spewing bigotry. How uncouth!

          • DavVictor

            Emotions of a girl, Brick-thick like a man.

    • BG

      There’s an old saying, “The squeaky wheel gets the grease.” Militant homosexuals have been doing a lot of squeaking to get noticed. At some point, if the wheel keeps on squeaking it gets tossed on the burn pile.

      • Mike Callor

        Do you think that comparing the homos to a squeaky wheel that ought to be tossed on “the burn pile” is going to win a lot of heterosexuals over to your cause and make them want to discriminate against or agree with discrimination against their LGBT friends and family members, or do you think it’s gonna wanna make them defend those friends and family members even more?

        By all means keep on digging your own grave…

      • BillTheCat45

        Oooo how threaty. We’ll wait for that while shaking in our booties.

      • vorpal

        It seems like most of the squeaking these days is coming from the right-wing religious extremists who scream about how victimized and bullied they supposedly are by the big, bad homosexuals that they terrorized and shamed for decades and decades.

  • PoorJedisDead

    You assert that the majority of Americans are against homosexuality and gay marriage. And yet you NEVER see any national advertising campaigns funded by NOM, NARTH, or JONAH. Perhaps it is because NO ONE Is donating money to them. Perhaps it is because the majority of Americans (every poll agrees) support the LGBT community and gay marriage. You may now begin commenting with your conspiracy theories.

    • Tom

      The Family Research Council has just launched yet another national campaign group to oppose equal marriage. Is the National Organisation for Marriage not doing a sufficient amount of work? What benefit does the FRC see in launching yet another such campaign group. Why not just direct donors to NOM, or incorporate a NOM donation button on the FRC website. It seems like a needless division of labour and resources.

  • HP McLovincraft

    Gay Cooties! I’m getting the Fear……

    lulz

    Even the idiot from Chik-fil-a realizes his mistakes and is clamming up.

    Gay people have money. Discrimination costs businesses money. Go figure.

    Capitalism, yo!

    • DavVictor

      With <5% of the population I'd hardly be worried about Gay pride and neither is the Cathy family. You are essentially saying that they are compromising Christians which flies in the face of all of the evidence presented to the contrary thus far as well as how they run their company publicly.

      • HP McLovincraft

        You should try getting some news from outside the derp bubble echochamber.

        myajc.Com/news/business/cathy-seeks-to-put-gay-marriage-flap-behind-chick-/nfCHj/

        • DavVictor

          Did you read the article?
          —————————
          But while he may not be tweeting his views again any time soon, Cathy made it clear, when asked, that his personal feelings on gay marriage haven’t changed.

          “I think the time of truths and principles are captured and codified in God’s word and I’m just personally committed to
          that,” he said. “I know others feel very different from that and I respect their opinion and I hope that they would be respectful of mine.”
          —————————

          Derp, derp, derp, derp……

          • BillTheCat45

            Aaaand he won’t be spending any more money against gays. And that’s all we care about, thanks for playing!

  • Mike C

    It’s a religious observance!

  • Mike C

    It’s a dignified Catholic holiday!

  • Mike C

    Preserve the sanctity of St. Patricks Day!

  • SouthernPatriot

    Thank you again Matt. A couple of years ago, I took a visiting friend to a parade in New Orleans. By the time we negotiated the clogged streets about a mile from the parade route and walked that distance, his children were tired, so we waited for a few moments on a side street.

    A small group following the parade, broke off a stumbled into our side street. There in the middle of the street the men, who were already wearing little dropped what they were wearing and began various sex acts on the street. I will skip the parts of the challenge he had now with his children, but I went for a policeman. The policeman said, “…that happens. Just ignore it!”

    If a man and a woman were having sex on a street, there would have been some arrests. But two sexually aberrant deviants (SADs) with reprobate mind can engage in sex acts on the street in the public during the parade and it is excused.

    • Mike Callor

      You mean like when the police ignore thousands of public heterosexual sex acts during Mardi Gras and spring break?

    • BillTheCat45

      AWW POOR BABY

    • vorpal

      If your story is true, I hope you know that most of us LGBT folks would oppose and universally condemn such public behaviour. This is not typical of LGBT people in any way, and every group has perverts in it. The stories that my heterosexual female friends have told me about heterosexual males they’ve met could easily go a long way to convince someone that heterosexual males are all vile, deviant perverts – and yet I sincerely hope that we know better than to accept that generalization.

      • SouthernPatriot

        If the stories told to you by a third party, your “heterosexual female friends” are true…compare those third party reports to what I personally witnessed. You need help. The truth is you need deliverance as well as they do, a real “come to Jesus” experience which will bring much needed healing and deliverance from reprobate mind and behavior.

        • vorpal

          I tried Jesus for 24 years and was extremely committed.
          I grew up, became an adult, and got better.

          • SouthernPatriot

            Based upon your own confession, you became much worse: Romans I: 24 – 32:

            24 Wherefore God also gave them up to uncleanness through the lusts of their own hearts, to dishonour their own bodies between themselves:

            25 Who changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and served the creature more than the Creator, who is blessed for ever. Amen.

            26 For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature:

            27 And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet.

            28 And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate mind, to do those things which are not convenient;

            29 Being filled with all unrighteousness, fornication, wickedness, covetousness, maliciousness; full of envy, murder, debate, deceit, malignity; whisperers,

            30 Backbiters, haters of God, despiteful, proud, boasters, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents,

            31 Without understanding, covenantbreakers, without natural affection, implacable, unmerciful:

            32 Who knowing the judgment of God, that they which commit such things are worthy of death, not only do the same, but have pleasure in them that do them.

  • Halou

    I don’t think the Saint Patrick’s Day Parade organizers have much to say with regards to terrorism.

    In the 1980s they chose Joe Doherty to be the lead marcher, a man affiliated with terrorist bombers in Britain and Ireland and part of the “M60 Gang”, called such for their smuggling of firearms into Ireland and Britain, firearms that were used to shoot civilians and soldiers in both countries. Evidently shooting at your nation’s allies is perfectly acceptable conduct to the march’s Catholic organizers.
    And it wasn’t just in the 1980s, for the 2002 parade, with 9/11 still fresh in people’s memories the parade organizers decided it would be a good idea to choose the convicted terrorist bomber Brian Pearson to be the parade’s Grand Marshal, prompting Irish-American police officers and firemen to refuse to take part in protest. Because in the wake of two buildings being destroyed, we need to know that blowing up two buildings is absolutely not terrorism.
    And even as recently as 2013 the parade included banners honoring terrorists, specifically Bobby Sands, Kieran Doherty, and Joe McDonnel. With all three involved in repeated gun battles and the use of explosives against civilian and police targets and membership of the terrorist group “The Provisional IRA”.

    To say that inviting an LGBT contingent to participate would be too much like promoting terrorism, it is a joke.

  • barbaro70

    IT HAS TO BE SAID: Homosexuality and homosexuals are sterile, and this sterility produces frustration, frustration in pathetically attempting to imitate normal people in their intimacy, which instead of producing a fertile result, babies, produces only disease, spreads disease, and kills the homosexuals 20 years early. Evolution, or God if you prefer, designed the genitals to be used in a complementary way, in a mutual way, not in the brutal way that homosexuals use the genitals. That is the whole story, and every time homosexuals whine about not being able to be savages in the so-called pride parades, we have to tell them and the world for those timid people that the basis of the homosexual problem is the sterility of homosexuality and homosexuals. The homosexuals and their homosexualist masters will at some point understand that normal people will not allow homosexual whining to impose any nonsense on normal people, precisely because of this defective foundation of the homosexual problem.

    • Mike Callor

      1) Homosexuality is sterile, most homosexuals are not.

      2) Married homosexual men and women live as long as their married heterosexual counterparts.

      3) Only around 4% of homosexuals in the U.S are HIV+ and thanks to modern medical science, those individuals can and do live up until the national average. Recent medical research out of the UK has even suggested that the lifespan of HIV+ individuals may soon surpass the national average in many western countries thanks to the medically healthier lifestyles of those people in general.

      4) Homosexual pride parades are no more or less savage than the heterosexual equivalents; Mardi Gra and spring break.

      5) Poll after poll shows that the public opinion and majority support now lies safely in the homosexuals corner. Think about it, there is no way that big business, who spend hundreds of millions every year to gauge public opinion would be standing behind 1-2% of the population otherwise.

      • barbaro70

        1) Homosexuality is sterile and all homosexuals are sterile: When homosexuals stick their p3nises up their buddies´ rear ends, there are no ovaries there to receive the sperm, so there is no fertilization, so all homosexuals are sterile by their choosing.

        2) When homosexuals fool around with the nasty material in their buddies´ rear ends and tear up the sphincter muscle and rectal/colon areas, among many other problems and disease produced and spread by homosexuals, they reduce their life expectancy by about 20 years.

        4) If you think that normal people´s parades are bad, YOU work on that, while we will continue to work on the homosexual problem. If normal people´s parades are bad, that is not justification for homosexuals to do the same.

        5) If public opinion and majority support now lies safely in the homosexuals´ corner, and we believe that there are angles to that, we are working to fix that. We admit that we can´t understand why 1% of the population is making big business jump through hoops, but we are working on that–of course, what happened to the Boy Scouts is one indication of the public´s thinking, not to mention the Chick-fil-A phenomenon on 8/15/12, and other great indicators of normal people´s thinking regarding homosexuals and homosexuality.

        • Mike Callor

          1) Sterile is a word which actually has a defined meaning, most homosexuals are perfectly capable of having children, whether through surrogacy, sperm donation, or prior heterosexual relationships and thus they are not sterile.

          2) Again there is no reputable source for the 20 years figure that you cite and it is actively refuted by countless studies and research papers which have found no meaningful difference between the life expectancies of healthy homosexuals and healthy heterosexuals.

          3) You missed 3.

          4) It’s not a question if, thousands public sex acts are a given at any spring break celebration.

          5) Chick-fil-A experienced a huge bump in revenue from the anti-gay crowd after Mr. Cathy’s marriage statements, for all of about 2 months, then their revenue settled at a LOWER level than it had been at before. Since the summer of 2012, Chick-fil-A has instituted a non-discrimination policy which covers “sexual orientation”, they are also currently in compliance with all partner benefit laws in states where same-sex marriage is legal and recognized and they no longer donate any money to anti-gay causes or charities.

          If you want to know where public opinion lies on this issue, do a quick twitter search on reaction the recent gay discrimination law out of Arizona, you’re not going to like it, support was about 40-1 in favor of the homosexuals.

        • John

          Why on earth does your mommy allow you computer time? You spread some of the more ridiculous lies there are about homosexuals. Get an education.

          • barbaro70

            Our mommy allows us computer time to spread the word about the fundamental aspect of the homosexual problem: Homosexuals and homosexuality are sterile, and that is because the attempt to imitate normal people in their intimacy, but fail pathetically and instead of producing babies produce only disease, spread it, and die early. God, or evolution if preferred, designed the genitals for mutuality, for complementarity, not for ripping up their friends rear ends.

          • vorpal

            Many people – both homo- and heterosexual – will tell you that the male penis fits just fine into the human anus, and can actually feel quite good.

            Indeed, there are quite a few heterosexual men who enjoy prostate stimulation, albeit not likely from a penis.

          • barbaro70

            how can we disagree with many people will tell us that the penis fits just fine into the anus? many people will tell you that sadism/masochism is great and feels quite good

            but most of those people are in San Fransicko

            many people are in loony bins also

            many people enjoy drugs

            many people….

            etc

          • vorpal

            I’m sure that – if you’re so inclined – sadomasochism is great and feels quite good and can be quite satisfying. It isn’t my cup of tea, but if you like it, more power to you.

            So what?

            Then again, you’re a Christian who despises homosexuals. Shows a lot about your judgment.

          • barbaro70

            Folks, Mr. Vorpal, Ph3, is telling everyone that the penis fits just fine into the anus and that sadism/masochism is great, feels quite good and can be quite satisfying. Can we expect anything more from people who pervert the basic human endeavour?

            And Mr. Vorpal is also accusing us of despising homosexuals, when we have indicated nothing like that, when all we do is laugh at homosexuals´ claims that the penis fits just fine into the anus, when what we really despise are the huge amounts of taxpayer money that goes to clean up the homosexual messes, the homosexual diseases. That is nothing unexpected, because when the basis of the homosexual problem, the sterility and the consequent attempt to imitate normal people in their intimacy producing, not babies, but disease, then homosexuals resort to distraction and insults.

        • vorpal

          Homosexuals comprise far more than 1% of the population.

          • barbaro70

            no, the figures oscillate around one to two percent, if it were any more, the problem would be a lot more serious

          • vorpal

            No, it’s consistently between 3-4% (unlike you, I can provide citations backing this up). Indeed, two studies that were done showed that when anonymity of people being asked was absolutely guaranteed (even during the interview process, which was not face-to-face), the number for men identifying as gay / bisexual / bi-curious jumped up to about 8%, and the women so identifying, IIRC, was around 12%.

          • barbaro70

            No, the reliable information, that is the information produced by normal people, show the number to be 1.3% or something like that. Think about it, Mr. Vorpal, we would be swimming in disease if it were any more. Suicides would be taking place all the time.

      • vorpal

        As much as I admire your patience, calm demeanour, and excellent explanations, Mike Callor, I’ll warn you in advance that explaining real facts about homosexuality and the methodology of debate to barbaro70 is a futile exercise. You’d have better success teaching abstract algebra to a fern.

    • vorpal

      I knew I’d find you here stomping about incoherently and muttering the word “sterile” under your breath repeatedly – and you didn’t disappoint one iota!

      So again you’re going to pull out the “early death” statistics, which you were unable to back up with any evidence in the previous discussion on homosexuality? I’m assuming that nothing’s changed and you still have no evidence on which to hang your little anti-gay lies?

      Oh, and look at that: you even managed to work the “homosexualist masters” into your rant once again.

      barbaro70, if you’re one thing, it’s delightfully and humourously consistent.

      • barbaro70

        yes, indeed: homosexuality and homosexuals are sterile, their obsession with imitating normal people and so perverting normal people´s sex cannot produce what normal people do, only sickness and sadness, spreading the sickness and dying about 20 years early, and all of this encouraged by the lib/lefty homosexualist masters

        • vorpal

          barbaro70 said: “Blah blah blah. Blah blah blah. Blahbety sterile, blah blah homomasters. Blah.”

          That covers the value of your post, essentially.

          • barbaro70

            what we said was, “yes, indeed: homosexuality and homosexuals are sterile, their obsession
            with imitating normal people and so perverting normal people´s sex
            cannot produce what normal people do, only sickness and sadness,
            spreading the sickness and dying about 20 years early, and all of this
            encouraged by the lib/lefty homosexualist masters” and vorpie, you have nothing to refute that

          • John

            Again, just for you, there are no studies out there that show homosexuals die earlier than anyone else. Are you just that dense? Its quite pathetic that you cant come up with anything that supports your position. You and your just like to come on the net a spew garbage. Try again

          • barbaro70

            We can´t do your homework for you, John–we are very busy correcting the homosexual problem, the homosexual whining about discrimination. The CDC and several other sites have all of the information on the shortened life span of homosexuals. But anyone with eyeballs and common sense, which is, knows that the sterility of homosexuality and homosexuals, egged on by the homosexuals´ homosexualist masters, drives homosexuals to pervert normal people´s intimacy by attempting to imitate it, utterly fail, and produce instead of what normal people produce, babies, produce and spread disease and are dropping like flies.

          • vorpal

            When you’re done lying and talking nonsense, come find me.

            <— gay, not sad at all.

          • barbaro70

            reminding folks that the basis for the homosexual and homosexualist whining for special rights, like marriage for homosexuals, that basis being rolling around in your buddies´ (plural) feces and wanting anal penetration is lying, is nonsense? you have things upside down, but then your whole lives are sad, upside down lives

            and actually we do NOT want to find you, it is you who keep coming back for lessons in reality

          • vorpal

            I would absolutely love to know how you think gay people spend a typical Saturday.

  • Janet Gerl

    MC you wrote “I doubt you read any scholarly books on the subject,” Now your going to try to tell me what I read and don’t read……..I’m talking to an idiot….. I’m done with this discussion.

  • BillTheCat45

    SO MUCH IMPOTENT RAGE HAHAHA

    • Mike Callor

      It is all that they have left, and the irony of it is that it’s only winning over more heterosexuals to the homosexual rights cause…

  • Alencon

    “Sully their Saint?”

    Are you kidding me? Have you EVER been to a New York City, Boston or Hoboken bar on Saint Patrick’s day?

    As for the raunchy displays that sometimes occur as part of gay pride parades, that will get squashed as gays move more into the mainstream because that sort of behavior is simply not acceptable to mainstream Americans.

    It exists today as an “in your face” sort of response to what has been a hostile majority. But, the majority is no longer hostile, so that sort of acting out will rapidly become counter productive and fade.

  • JoeMyGodNYC

    Keep them homos out of St Patrick’s Day! This godly parade is ONLY for vomiting Christians who like to screw in public behind dumpsters! Praise! GLORY!

    • LouiseCA

      You are just a charming individual, aren’t you? Perverts are to be found in all groups.

      And how dare you blaspheme God on this site.

      • Jean-Marc in Canada

        You can’t blaspheme that which does not exist.

        • Oscar

          Thanks for proving a negative, which logically is impossible to do.

      • Guest

        Your god can suck my furry scrotum.

  • roaucasa

    Anal sex is an addiction, not a sexual preference, ask any doctor who does not practice sodomy. If an anal sex junkie is placed in a very nice confinement, with all the amenities and comfort with the only restriction being no contact with another male. In two, three days the inmate placed in gracious living would began to climb walls in a severe cold turkey withdrawal spasms.

    • JoeMyGodNYC

      LOL! I am curious about your home planet and its people. Please tell us more!

    • vorpal

      Comedy gold!
      Is the addiction limited to men only, or can women experience it as well?

  • Jean-Marc in Canada

    I’m sorry but I have to call BS. St. Patrick’s has ZERO to do with religion and everything to do with people donning green clothing, calling themselves Irish for the day and getting piss drunk. Talk about debauchery.

    • vorpal

      Precisely. Any attempt to connect a religious significance to St. Patrick’s Day – one of the most debauch days of the year – is absurd.

  • JoeMyGodNYC

    “What’s the likelihood that “gay pride” organizers would ever allow Christians to march in their parades?” Um, that likelihood is 100% as the Catholic League was today granted permission to march in the NYC Pride Parade in protest of “the Big Beer brouhaha.” As for NARTH – they probably won’t apply since their founder was recently busted with a lithe young male latino prostitute. Look up “George Rekers” and “male hooker”! LOLOLOLOL!

  • Oscar

    Great article and a perfect expose of the “tolerant” homosexuals.
    Only could split one hair in the piece: Patrick wasn’t Catholic (or protestant for that matter).

    • vorpal

      Where do right-wing Christians get this idea that apparently gay people are supposed to be tolerant (especially of a group that has historically tried to shame and oppress them)?

  • polymath156

    Awesome article. Well said and factual. Wish the NYT would dig some diversity and print it, but no they just aren’t oriented that way.

  • Michelle

    SODOM AND GOMORRAH – JUDGEMENT IS ON ITS WAY!
    SAD BUT TRUE

    • vorpal

      In Canada, same-sex marriage has been legal for over ten years now. We’ll let you know when brimstone starts raining down from the sky and people turn into pillars of salt. Don’t hold your breath.

  • David

    a bit of fictional exaggeration in this article – the groups that wanted to march in the St Patrick’s parades were not fringe activists who were likely to run around 1/2 naked etc. One was a veterans group, hardly left wing maniacs. That said, I do think that they should just back off, if they want to be in the parade no one said they can’t,they just can’t carry signs. St Patrick’s celebrations are known for excessive drinking and the associated behaviours, not particularly holy events so trying the religious angle doesn’t work. If NAMBLA is in a “pride” parade it is without permission from the organizers, all legitimate groups long ago broke association with them. Folsom Street Fair is not a gay pride event, it is a leather/S&M celebration attended by a broad spectrum of people. I’m not at all defending it I think it’s a disgusting display, but at least be honest about what it is. “Pride” parades are also excessive displays and when they break local laws they should be called on it. I realize of course that any such action would result in loud shrieking cries of bigotry etc. I am glad the author at least acknowledge that these events and actions don’t represent all of the LGBT communities. People should not be condemned for things they aren’t responsible for and don’t support.

  • SecularPatriot

    Jeff remains oblivious to the fact that this is a non-issue in Ireland. Ever watch the Saint Patrick’s Day Parade in Dublin? Gays and ethnic minority floats. THE HORROR!

    Yes, you will find more multiculturalism in an Irish St. Patrick’s day parade than in the US.

  • Sandra Trusso

    These people have no respect for anything, or anyone (including themselves). Doesn’t anyone remember the vile statements made about Cardinal O’Connor, and Rev. Jerry Falwell after their deaths? Doesn’t anyone remember gay protests outside of the churches during the funerals? They don’t even respect the families of the deceased. They disrespect and try to destroy anyone who disagrees with them. … and they are vicious and cruel people who claim to be loving. St. Patrick’s Day parade is just one more thing that they want to destroy. Anything that Christians or Jews who disagree with them, hold dear is marked for destruction. They gain what they want by force… it doesn’t matter how many times the majority of people vote against them, they bring it back until the legislatures simply over ride the will of the people. This is called “Dictatorship”, and for all of you who think this is wonderful, make no mistake…. when the time comes that the power shifts and you are the ones who are dictated to, and forced (and it will), you will then realize the horror of what you’re agreement with such actions is doing to the rest of America.

    • Sandra Trusso

      … and by the way, my statement above is a generalization, because I do not believe that all homosexuals are like this, only the radicals who care nothing about anyone else, or anything else other than getting their own way regardless of the destruction it causes.

  • Sandra Trusso

    Here we are in America, practically going down for the last time, and all these people care about is trying to normalize an abnormal behavior choice. They don’t care if the whole country goes under as long as they have their way legalizing this behavior.

  • Alex Guittarr

    I love this site. It’s making the future of the LGBT movement so much brighter. Keep bringing the rhetoric, Barbwire!

EmailTitle2

Sign up for BarbWire alerts!